Author Topic: Anectdotal witness evidence  (Read 8416 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #465 on: January 04, 2022, 06:40:09 PM »
There are currently two separate investigations into Madeleine's disappearance. Why do people keep trying to suggest there's only one?

Do you have a cite showing either of them describing the dog alerts as irrelevant? I suspect that word was chosen by you.

There is only one... That's why they have met to confer.  Do you have any evidence there is more, than one.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #466 on: January 04, 2022, 06:48:21 PM »
There is only one... That's why they have met to confer.  Do you have any evidence there is more, than one.

There have been attempts in the past to suggest that OG were conducting a joint investigation with the PJ, just based on the fact that they met. That wasn't true and neither is the claim that OG and the BKA are working on the same theory imo.
England - good effort

Offline Swertigo Virl

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #467 on: January 04, 2022, 06:53:19 PM »
There have been attempts in the past to suggest that OG were conducting a joint investigation with the PJ, just based on the fact that they met. That wasn't true and neither is the claim that OG and the BKA are working on the same theory imo.
Is it untrue to say that OG and the BKA consider that Madeleine was abducted by a stranger and that therefore the dog alerts can play no part in such a scenario? 
I no longer read nor reply to posts made by those posters I perceive to be WUMS and TROLLS so if you think I'm ignoring you this may be the reason.  Best wishes.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #468 on: January 04, 2022, 07:24:28 PM »
There have been attempts in the past to suggest that OG were conducting a joint investigation with the PJ, just based on the fact that they met. That wasn't true and neither is the claim that OG and the BKA are working on the same theory imo.

Cressida Dick has said Grange are working very closely with the Germans...Your highlighted claim is laughable imo

Offline Swertigo Virl

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #469 on: January 04, 2022, 08:01:33 PM »
Is it untrue to say that OG and the BKA consider that Madeleine was abducted by a stranger and that therefore the dog alerts can play no part in such a scenario?
Well G-Unit?  Are you going to answer this?
I no longer read nor reply to posts made by those posters I perceive to be WUMS and TROLLS so if you think I'm ignoring you this may be the reason.  Best wishes.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #470 on: January 04, 2022, 08:05:34 PM »
Well G-Unit?  Are you going to answer this?

Correct.
England - good effort

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #471 on: January 04, 2022, 08:08:38 PM »
Well G-Unit?  Are you going to answer this?

When Grime himself admits Eddie was unreliable there's no way the alerts can be defended

Offline Carana

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #472 on: January 04, 2022, 08:17:30 PM »
The dog alerts are not evidence of abduction. I don't know what evidence of abduction the police are relying on.

I walked out of a supermarket a couple of weeks ago and set an alarm off. I'd paid for everything and everything was double-checked. Alarm went off again. I then walked back, left my bag of stuff, emptied my pockets, took my coat off, left my handbag, everything conceivable short of a strip show, and still set the alarms off yet again.

I've no doubt that the supermarket has video evidence that my passage set off an alarm, but there is no evidence that I'd done anything wrong, because I hadn't.

Offline Swertigo Virl

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #473 on: January 04, 2022, 08:50:31 PM »
Correct.
why not?   Donít you realise how  that makes you look?
I no longer read nor reply to posts made by those posters I perceive to be WUMS and TROLLS so if you think I'm ignoring you this may be the reason.  Best wishes.

Offline Swertigo Virl

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #474 on: January 04, 2022, 08:53:30 PM »
I walked out of a supermarket a couple of weeks ago and set an alarm off. I'd paid for everything and everything was double-checked. Alarm went off again. I then walked back, left my bag of stuff, emptied my pockets, took my coat off, left my handbag, everything conceivable short of a strip show, and still set the alarms off yet again.

I've no doubt that the supermarket has video evidence that my passage set off an alarm, but there is no evidence that I'd done anything wrong, because I hadn't.
Alarms donít lie Carana, you are obviously a shoplifter!
I no longer read nor reply to posts made by those posters I perceive to be WUMS and TROLLS so if you think I'm ignoring you this may be the reason.  Best wishes.