Might I be allowed to make the attempt to remove yet another rather silly and petty digression from the thread topic.
The use of semantics choosing one aspect of something I have mentioned in a post is becoming as predictable as it is tiresome.
I said: "Can't you see it? There is a 50/50 chance that Madeleine is dead ... there is a 50/50 chance that Madeleine is alive ... or at the least she was on the 4th May 2007."
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=8465.msg422735#msg422735British Police Say Madeleine McCann May Still Be AliveBy SANDY MACASKILLAPRIL 25, 2012
Snip“From the outset we have approached this review with a completely open mind, placing Madeleine McCann at the heart of everything we do,” Mr. Redwood said.
“We are working on the basis of two possibilities here. One is that Madeleine is still alive, and the second that she is sadly dead.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/26/world/europe/britain-reopens-the-madeleine-mccann-case.htmlTwo possibilities.
One ... Madeleine is still alive.
Second ... Madeleine is sadly dead. To describe that as 50/50 seems fine to me ... others may have different thought processes which leads them to another conclusion ... that is entirely their prerogative.
Following from Benice's post regarding 50/50
//// //// ////
11:20 : The first witness is being called by videoconference.
11:23 : It is the attorney who was in charge of the original inqury into Madeleine's disappearance, Jose Magalhaes e Menezes
//// //// ////
11:39 : The decision to designate Kate and Gerry as 'arguidos' was taken after the sniffer dogs carried out their searches.
11:40 : There were several possible charges that could have been brought against the McCanns: kidnapping and selling a child were among them. s.
11:48 : The witness was asked what the probability was of Madeleine still being alive. He replied that he thought it was 50/50.
http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t7174-sky-live-transcript-libel-case-completeIn my opinion a pattern is developing with spurious arguments being made using one aspect from my posts as ammunition ... if I could be bothered I would check back and prove it ... however I am aware of it and the disruption it is causing on the threads.
In future I will report anything which I think may be part of this pattern ... so now would be the time to desist.