McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[Mr Gray]

Until it arrives in a publically accessible ECHR system we won’t know.

we have a good idea ...imo

[Mr Gray]

It would be a foolish man who went in to bat on the strength of that.

Too much detail there for it not to be true...imo

[slartibartfast]

Too much detail there for it not to be true...imo

There is no detail there.

[Mr Gray]

There is no detail there.

is that a fact or your opinion...you just cannot see it...imo....I would have made a good detective...imo

imo there is detail that shows its a quote from clarence

[stephen25000]

we have this...

Family spokesman Clarence Mitchell told MailOnline: 'I can confirm that Kate and Gerry McCann’s Portuguese lawyers lodged an appeal application in the Amaral case with the European Court of Human Rights in July of this year.
'The Court acknowledged the application in August and its admissibility is now being examined. Kate and Gerry will not be commenting on any aspect whatsoever as it remains entirely a matter for their Portuguese lawyers.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4867778/Madeleine-McCann-s-parents-appeal-European-Court.html#ixzz50EjACXug
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook...






perhaps its all lies

The Supreme Court decision cannot be appealed. It stands.

Perhaps Clarence needs to understand that.

[Mr Gray]

The Supreme Court decision cannot be appealed. It stands.

Perhaps Clarence needs to understand that.

im sure he understands

[slartibartfast]

im sure he understands

I’m sure he knows exactly what he is doing.

[Mr Gray]

I’m sure he knows exactly what he is doing.

I agree

[stephen25000]

I’m sure he knows exactly what he is doing.

Indeed.

We know his operating procedure from previous examples.

He also knows he can't appeal the Supreme Court Judgement. So why does the Mail imply otherwise.

 

[jassi]

Until it arrives in a publically accessible ECHR system we won’t know.

Strange that there seems no mention of it on the ECHR site. Even if it had gone straight to the rubbish bin, you would have expected some reference to its receipt.

[barrier]

Strange that there seems no mention of it on the ECHR site. Even if it had gone straight to the rubbish bin, you would have expected some reference to its receipt.

That bin is probably overflowing.

[Mr Gray]

Case done and dusted.

Mccanns lost.

Time to get over it.

getting over it applies to the mccans and it appears they are taking the case to europe...I wish them every success

[stephen25000]

You are mistaken if you think the case affects me and that has nothing to do with what angelo has claimed...the SC did NOT rule on the mccanns innocence as angelo seeems to think

You are commenting on the case.

Now who was it who said, 'Amaral is toast ?

As to the judgement, there for anyone to read.

[Mr Gray]

You are commenting on the case.

Now who was it who said, 'Amaral is toast ?

As to the judgement, there for anyone to read.

As i have said many times I correctly predicted amaral was toast re the first hearing
I then correctly predicted amaral might win the second

I didnt comment on the third


I believe teh mccanns have applied to the ECHR...im confident their case will be accepted and Im confdent they will be successful

The judgement is their to read but from the posts some have not read it... I have read it and dont recall the SC saying the mccanns were not innocent...have you read it

[stephen25000]

A flawed judgement, overuled.

Amaral won. A matter of fact.

It is the Mccanns who were toast in the Portuguese Court, and they lost badly.

Still waiting to hear when they will pay up.

Their accounts are due by The end of the month.

Courtesy of Companies House.

A useful source of information to say the least.