McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[stephen25000]

the ECHR may well rule that amaral libelled the mccanns...so from that ppoint it is to do with amaral...there can be no enforcement against amaral . I dont think its embarrassing what happened to maddie I think its tragic...I beleive she was abducted and therefore blame the abductor not her parents

Amaral is out of The picture.

[Mr Gray]

Amaral is out of The picture.

I dont think he is......why do you think he has gone so quiet

[Angelo222]

the ECHR may well rule that amaral libelled the mccanns...so from that ppoint it is to do with amaral...there can be no enforcement against amaral . I dont think its embarrassing what happened to maddie I think its tragic...I beleive she was abducted and therefore blame the abductor not her parents

That's not the function of the European Court.  The clue is in the name ECHR.

[Mr Gray]

That's not the function of the European Court.  The clue is in the name ECHR.

the ECHR can rule that the mccanns were libelled by amaral

[Angelo222]

the ECHR can rule that the mccanns were libelled by amaral

No they can't.

[stephen25000]

I dont think he is......why do you think he has gone so quiet

He is doing the logical thing.

Waiting for the Mccanns to pay up, I would think.

Not that they will, and I hope they don't, as they will deserve what they get.

[Mr Gray]

No they can't.

Of course they can...they can rule that the SC have misinterpreted EU law and amaral has libelled the mccanns ...they have no enforcement against amaral but against the portuguese state

[Mr Gray]

Of course they can...they can rule that the SC have misinterpreted EU law and amaral has libelled the mccanns ...they have no enforcement against amaral but against the portuguese state

If the mccanns are successful in europe then the have a ruling taht amarals claims infringe their right to a good name,...libel.. If amaral repeats any claims they can then go back to the portuguese court with this clear ruling.

The SC were at pains to comply with EU law...are they suddenly going to ignore it in a new case...not imo

[stephen25000]

Of course they can...they can rule that the SC have misinterpreted EU law and amaral has libelled the mccanns ...they have no enforcement against amaral but against the portuguese state

They do not have enforcement powers against any state.

That has been explained to you already.

[Mr Gray]

They do not have enforcement powers.

That has been explained to you already.

i think you need to read my post again...and you will see I dont need any explanation....

..they have no enforcement against amaral but against the portuguese state

[kizzy]

I dont think he is......why do you think he has gone so quiet

Because he is a reserved man.

He hasn't a reputation to protect.

[stephen25000]

Because he is a reserved man.

He hasn't a reputation to protect.

I would say he has held up extremely well to the barrage of the MSM in this country, the McCann's, and their 'allies'.

[Mr Gray]

I would say he has held up extremely well to the barrage of the MSM in this country, the McCann's, and their 'allies'.

One thing I dislike is a dishonest policeman..it undermines the whole justice sysyem..imo...be that in any countrty

[kizzy]

some would say he has damaged his own reputaion...

 


I wouldn't think that was a problem for him.

Especially the amount raised for him, he has a lot of respect IMO.

[stephen25000]

i think you need to read my post again...and you will see I dont need any explanation....

..they have no enforcement against amaral but against the portuguese state

THEY CANNOT ENFORCE ANY DECISION AGAINST A COUNTRY.

Even the Express can get some things right.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/856415/European-Court-of-Human-Rights-ECHR-rulings-Council-of-Europe-Thorbjorn-Jagland

and

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/oct/03/conservatives-ignore-european-court-human-rights-rulings