In a formal interview, a lawyer who advises no comment answers in a situation where the suspect is the parent of a missing child, must have good reasons for doing so. It's not rocket science.
Neither is it rocket science when the husband/partner of Leonor Cipriano warns you that you will be fitted up as Leonor was.
And the British ambassader , who knows all about how Michael Cook was fitted up ... and about what happened in the V Bourges case and the Cipriano Case also warns you. Both were fitted up after torture
Did George Brown also warn them, I wonder. He was in touch.
John, if you were Kate, whilst noticing the inadequate search efforts and lies being propogated in the media about you ... and had you been made aware of 4 or 5 warnings such as the above, would you have answered any qestions ?
Knowing that they were not designed to find Madeleine, but just to attempt to trip you up and incrininate you. And all questions from a police officer who was a proven liar in the courts. A trickster.
Had you, as Kate, ended up in prison on false information, then who would have searched for Madeleine? Gerry would have been too busy Looking after the children, earning a living and trying to get you released.
Trying to find Justice and bring Madeleine back. No one else would have been looking.