The report was inconclusive.
Please keep to the facts.
BTW, this post is not goading.
It is apparent that Goncalo Amaral either failed to understand the DNA results, or that he chose to disregard them, but there is absolutely no reason why anyone should perpetuate that error given that they have been subject to so much discussion and explanation since their release into the public domain.
**snip
In an e-mail dated 3 September 2007, John Lowe of the major incidents team of the Forensic Science Service (FSS) said
it was impossible to conclude whether the material taken from the car came from Madeleine.
The e-mail was translated into Portuguese the following day and four days later Portuguese detectives named the McCanns arguidos - formal suspects - citing DNA evidence as grounds for their suspicions.
In his message to Det Supt Stuart Prior, head of the British side of the inquiry, Mr Lowe said a sample from the boot of the McCanns' hire car, which they rented 24 days after Madeleine went missing, contained 15 out of 19 of her DNA components.
But he cautioned that this result - based on the controversial "low copy number" DNA analysis technique which uses very small samples - was "too complex for meaningful interpretation or inclusion".
The expert said the components of the missing girl's DNA profile were not unique to her - in fact some were present among FSS scientists, including himself.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7541810.stm