Author Topic: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.  (Read 268094 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #255 on: October 27, 2013, 05:24:28 PM »
they would have had to know about it first

They know about it now and still now rebuttal....

The article also mentioned lie detector tests. It didn't specify who had taken them though. I'd love to know whether that was the reason for the Mccanns agreeing to do lie detector tests then backing out.....

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #256 on: October 27, 2013, 05:24:31 PM »
Remember Clarence's Cooperman news conference - there was plenty of time and money to publicise this red-herring. Why no publicity for the Smith e-fits?

Mitchell's Cooperman splash was January 2008, nearly a year before they had these e-fits it seems.

But the one he did with Edgar about the 'suspiciously behaving' woman in Barcelona(!) was certainly after November 2008. He could have used the e-fits then couldn't he.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #257 on: October 27, 2013, 05:24:54 PM »
A child is missing, if the article is true, it means a possible means of finding her was surpressed.

Laugh it up Anne, get out your dancing shoes and  celebrate.
There's a misunderstanding, here. SH and I weren't referring to the truth about Madeleine McCann.

Offline Jazzy

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #258 on: October 27, 2013, 05:25:36 PM »
There's a misunderstanding, here. SY and I weren't referring to the truth about Madeleine McCann.

No misunderstanding.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #259 on: October 27, 2013, 05:26:17 PM »
I can't believe what I am reading - I thought the clocks only went back by an hour today - things like:

If they don't sue - it must be true

If they don't deny - it cannot be a lie

If they are not Rucked - they are not f---d

Were repeated with so much glee and back slapping years ago.

Doe anyone remember the old has been duffer from Essex who used to use those phrases and permutations of them?

He spent many a happy hour in the High Court making a complete fool of himself.


Offline Jazzy

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #260 on: October 27, 2013, 05:27:09 PM »
So he did.

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #261 on: October 27, 2013, 05:27:19 PM »
I can't believe what I am reading - I thought the clocks only went back by an hour today - things like:

If they don't sue - it must be true

If they don't deny - it cannot be a lie

If they are not Rucked - they are not f---d

Were repeated with so much glee and back slapping years ago.

Doe anyone remember the old has been duffer from Essex who used to use those phrases and permutations of them?

He spent many a happy hour in the High Court making a complete fool of himself.

He wrote books 8(0(*

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #262 on: October 27, 2013, 05:27:53 PM »
Mitchell's Cooperman splash was January 2008, nearly a year before they had these e-fits it seems.

But the one he did with Edgar about the 'suspiciously behaving' woman in Barcelona(!) was certainly after November 2008. He could have used the e-fits then couldn't he.
We don't know whether Edgar had these e-fits in his pocket when he was in the Algarve.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #263 on: October 27, 2013, 05:28:14 PM »
He wrote books 8(0(*

He sold books.

The clue is in the second word.

Benita

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #264 on: October 27, 2013, 05:28:35 PM »
I can't believe what I am reading - I thought the clocks only went back by an hour today - things like:

If they don't sue - it must be true

If they don't deny - it cannot be a lie

If they are not Rucked - they are not f---d

Were repeated with so much glee and back slapping years ago.

Doe anyone remember the old has been duffer from Essex who used to use those phrases and permutations of them?

He spent many a happy hour in the High Court making a complete fool of himself.


combover!!! @)(++(*

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #265 on: October 27, 2013, 05:29:00 PM »
I can't believe what I am reading - I thought the clocks only went back by an hour today - things like:

If they don't sue - it must be true

If they don't deny - it cannot be a lie

If they are not Rucked - they are not f---d

Were repeated with so much glee and back slapping years ago.

Doe anyone remember the old has been duffer from Essex who used to use those phrases and permutations of them?

He spent many a happy hour in the High Court making a complete fool of himself.

Are you seriously suggesting that the Mccans will not denounce this is it's not true?

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #266 on: October 27, 2013, 05:30:05 PM »
Is this Extons problem?

The McCanns were also understandably wary of Oakley after allegations that the chairman, Kevin Halligen, failed to pass on money paid by the fund to Exton’s team. Halligen denies this. He was later convicted of fraud in an unrelated case in the US.

So who's lying Exton or Halligen?
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #267 on: October 27, 2013, 05:30:15 PM »
I wonder how many people have signed up for subscriptions to the sunday times today

Offline Apostate

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #268 on: October 27, 2013, 05:30:40 PM »
We don't know whether Edgar had these e-fits in his pocket when he wasin the Algarve.


What was stopping them giving the e-fits to the media? Clarence is hardly shy and retiring - and they eagerly print everything else he gives them.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #269 on: October 27, 2013, 05:33:16 PM »
He sold books.

The clue is in the second word.
What is the point to write books if nobody reads them ?