Author Topic: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.  (Read 267368 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Apostate

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #510 on: October 29, 2013, 08:25:16 PM »
I am too and also that the PJ nor SY were never given the e-fits.

The strategy here is to keep quiet and hope it goes away. However many won't forget.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #511 on: October 29, 2013, 08:27:00 PM »
The strategy here is to keep quiet and hope it goes away. However many won't forget.

especially now its been in the papers and saved to millions of computers

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #512 on: October 29, 2013, 08:30:33 PM »
The strategy here is to keep quiet and hope it goes away. However many won't forget.
I wish you were an apostate of this e-fit whose empty eyes give the creeps..

Offline Apostate

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #513 on: October 29, 2013, 08:55:10 PM »
I wish you were an apostate of this e-fit whose empty eyes give the creeps..

Face of Evil

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #514 on: October 29, 2013, 08:59:13 PM »
Face of Evil

Why  are the two efits so 100 per cent DIFFERENT!

wierd


AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #515 on: October 29, 2013, 09:14:45 PM »
Why  are the two efits so 100 per cent DIFFERENT!

wierd
Jamming effect. Intended ? Not sure.
What I still can't understand is for what reason the McCanns concealed those innocuous e-fits that don't confirm at all the feeling Mr Smith indicated in his statement. I would find understandable that they concealed Mr Smith's suggestion, not the e-fits that were very far from confirming it.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #516 on: October 29, 2013, 09:32:37 PM »
Jamming effect. Intended ? Not sure.
What I still can't understand is for what reason the McCanns concealed those innocuous e-fits that don't confirm at all the feeling Mr Smith indicated in his statement. I would find understandable that they concealed Mr Smith's suggestion, not the e-fits that were very far from confirming it.

Good question...and Im tired of asking why gail cooper man and vicky beckham lookalike were given big press conferences, each of which were a million miles a way from efits done of a man seen THAT NIGHT IN THE AREA WITH A BLONDE 4 yr old CHILD....and of which not a pip squeek was ever made by the mccanns......for five years...but now in 2013 scotland yard have fanfared them.......!

Wierd case by any standard......
« Last Edit: October 29, 2013, 09:40:47 PM by Redblossom »

Offline Kazcutt

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #517 on: October 29, 2013, 09:48:02 PM »
Good question...and Im tired of asking why gail cooper man and vicky beckham lookalike were given big press conferences, each of which were a million miles a way from efits done of a man seen THAT NIGHT IN THE AREA WITH A BLONDE 4 yr old CHILD....and of which not a pip squeek was ever made by the mccanns......for five years...but now in 2013 scotland yard have fanfared them.......!

Wierd case by any standard......

Stephen carpenter saw dodgy man as well (dreadlocks)

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #518 on: October 29, 2013, 09:53:46 PM »
Stephen carpenter saw dodgy man as well (dreadlocks)

email mitchell to set up a press conference, he must have missed that......,,,

have you seen bob marley  lookalike.....we need to eliminate him pdq........
« Last Edit: October 29, 2013, 09:56:37 PM by Redblossom »

Offline Apostate

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #519 on: October 29, 2013, 10:27:55 PM »
Good question...and Im tired of asking why gail cooper man and vicky beckham lookalike were given big press conferences, each of which were a million miles a way from efits done of a man seen THAT NIGHT IN THE AREA WITH A BLONDE 4 yr old CHILD....and of which not a pip squeek was ever made by the mccanns......for five years...but now in 2013 scotland yard have fanfared them.......!

This is the big question - one that needs answering. And not just that it was ignored - but BURIED by McLawyers.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #520 on: October 29, 2013, 11:06:01 PM »
Apostate,
why are you using a suspected abductor/or person of interest as a badge,your making him look like a hero when infact he is wanted by the police in a missing girls case,why would you do that.



"he is wanted by the police in a missing girls case"

Pretty good reason to show the e-fit really isn't it.  Someone might recognise it.

Would you rather it was hidden for a few more years?
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #521 on: October 30, 2013, 12:00:49 AM »
How rude!

When will Admin ban you for ever?

When will you  accept that on  THIS  forum it is Admin who decides who is banned

Stop provoking ... it is quite ridiculous from one who has been banned themselves, more than once, for breaking forum rules  ....  and who brags about it on other forums as being a  'badge of honour'


Offline faithlilly

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #522 on: October 30, 2013, 12:40:21 AM »
What a disgraceful post.

To be perfectly honest I think Red is amazingly restrained in her posts to supporters considering the sheer nastiness she is the recipient of at times.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #523 on: October 30, 2013, 12:47:16 AM »
To be perfectly honest I think Red is amazingly restrained in her posts to supporters considering the sheer nastiness she is the recipient of at times.

Admin aren't daft faithlilly  ...  they see the nasty   'ensemble'  bullying that Red is targeted with

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #524 on: October 30, 2013, 02:11:15 AM »
"he is wanted by the police in a missing girls case"

Pretty good reason to show the e-fit really isn't it.  Someone might recognise it.

Would you rather it was hidden for a few more years?


Unfortunately it's not very likely that anyone is going to 'recognise' either of those e-fits.