Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.

[stephen25000]

Exton ..we a re told..was head of Oakley, as was halligen   so they must have met and discussed ..

Kannedy can visit who he likes.....its none of your business

Kennedy was interfering with a witness.

A highly important point.

He had no business doing so.

That was the job of the police.

[Aiofe]

Kennedy was interfering with a witness.

A highly important point.

He had no business doing so.

That was the job of the police.

What do you mean 'interfering with a witness'. That is not any type of criminal offence anywhere that I know of.

[Mr Gray]

Kennedy was interfering with a witness.

A highly important point.

He had no business doing so.

That was the job of the police.

When was the visit

[stephen25000]

What do you mean 'interfering with a witness'. That is not any type of criminal offence anywhere that I know of.

he had no business seeing him.

That's the job of a police.

As to interfering with a potential witness, look it up.

[Mr Gray]

he had no business seeing him.

That's the job of a police.

As to interfering with a potential witness, look it up.

was the visit after the case was shelved

[icabodcrane]

Exton ..we a re told..was head of Oakley, as was halligen   so they must have met and discussed ..

Kannedy can visit who he likes.....its none of your business

Halligen  'sub contracted'  the actual investigative work to Henri Exton  (  in other words,  Exton was employed by Halligen on a contract  )

As far as I am aware,  no-one has ever disputed that Exton was the  'real deal'  and that he was,  in fact,  the only genuine professional  'abduction'  expert  to have ever been used by the McCanns

In the end,  of course,  they rejected his expert findings  and buried his report because it didn't support  the story they were telling

[Aiofe]

Halligen  'sub contracted'  the actual investigative work  Henri Exton  (  in other words,  Exton was employed by Halligen on a contract  )

As far as I am aware,  no-one has ever disputed that Exton was the  'real deal'  and that he was,  in fact,  the only genuine professional  'abduction'  expert  to have ever been used by the McCanns

In the end,  of course,  they rejected his expert findings  and buried his report because it didn't support  the story they were telling

At least you are guessing that is what they did. No proof it was not shared.

[stephen25000]

was the visit after the case was closed

I have had this discussion already.

The case was SHELVED, not closed.

[Redblossom]

was the visit after the case was closed

No

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/P16/16_VOLUME_XVIa_Page_4135.jpg

jan 2008

[Mr Gray]

Halligen  'sub contracted'  the actual investigative work  Henri Exton  (  in other words,  Exton was employed by Halligen on a contract  )

As far as I am aware,  no-one has ever disputed that Exton was the  'real deal'  and that he was,  in fact,  the only genuine professional  'abduction'  expert  to have ever been used by the McCanns

In the end,  of course,  they rejected his expert findings  and buried his report because it didn't support  the story they were telling

So ..in short... you have no evidence that Exton was head of...for MI5

[Mr Gray]

No

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/P16/16_VOLUME_XVIa_Page_4135.jpg

jan 2008

 Wheres the word VIST...It says Kennedy contacted him

[Redblossom]

 Whers the word VIST...It says Kennedy contacted him

not going to be dragged into minutae by you davel tonight, fact is, witnesses were pestered.....by someone working for the suspects at the time, how would that go down in this country?

[Aiofe]

he had no business seeing him.

That's the job of a police.

As to interfering with a potential witness, look it up.

Which law was broken in which jurisdiction. AN Englishman approaches an Irishman in Ireland about an event in Portugal.

Which law was broken? Which Jurisdiction.

You look it up and provide a link (it does not exist because you have made it up). You made the claim, you justify it with support please.

[Mr Gray]

not going to be dragged into minutae by you davel tonight, fact is, witnesses were pestered.....by someone working for the suspects at the time, how would that go down in this country?

Theers a massive difference between contacting and visiting...thanks for the info

[Aiofe]

not going to be dragged into minutae by you davel tonight, fact is, witnesses were pestered.....by someone working for the suspects at the time, how would that go down in this country?

There is no law stopping defence lawyers employing private detectives to interview witnesses- unless you can produce a reference for such a non-existent law. The accused or suspected has an absolute right to seek evidence to defend themselves. They may not threaten or intimidate witnesses, but they may seek to question them.