Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine

[Wonderfulspam]

So, why then, doesn't that kind Mr Redwood, just put a stop to it?

All he need do to put an end their alleged psychological damage is just give the trolling public a quick goosie at this indisputable evidence in his possession, which proves beyond a shadow of doubt that Kate & Gerry had absolutely no involvement whatsoever in Madeleine's disappearance & they can all live happily ever after, minus Madeleine.

He's a nice man isn't he?

So why doesn't he just do that?

I know why, it's cos there ain't none.

[Benice]

So, why then, doesn't that kind Mr Redwood, just put a stop to it?

All he need do to put an end their alleged psychological damage is just give the trolling public a quick goosie at this indisputable evidence in his possession, which proves beyond a shadow of doubt that Kate & Gerry had absolutely no involvement whatsoever in Madeleine's disappearance & they can all live happily ever after, minus Madeleine.

He's a nice man isn't he?

So why doesn't he just do that?

I know why, it's cos there ain't none.

Why would SY be bothered about 'placating' a group of sceptics on the internet?   It's not as if you would believe a word they said anyway.

For example  - DCI Redwood has unequivically and unambiguously stated that the McCanns are not suspects or even persons of interest -  and yet even that has been interpreted as.... 'they are prime suspects'.... in some quarters.

[Brietta]

So, why then, doesn't that kind Mr Redwood, just put a stop to it?

All he need do to put an end their alleged psychological damage is just give the trolling public a quick goosie at this indisputable evidence in his possession, which proves beyond a shadow of doubt that Kate & Gerry had absolutely no involvement whatsoever in Madeleine's disappearance & they can all live happily ever after, minus Madeleine.

He's a nice man isn't he?

So why doesn't he just do that?

I know why, it's cos there ain't none.

If that is a serious statement ... I despair for you.

Why on earth would the authorities release the details of an ongoing investigation of any crime ... let alone the details of an investigation into an abducted child ... onto the internet??

Such a suggestion is nothing short of insanity.

[faithlilly]

If that is a serious statement ... I despair for you.

Why on earth would the authorities release the details of an ongoing investigation of any crime ... let alone the details of an investigation into an abducted child ... onto the internet??

Such a suggestion is nothing short of insanity.

I agree.

Especially who they believe are involved.

[sadie]

I agree.

Especially who they believe are involved.

Yep, very important elite people involved almost certainly .... and they aint Kate and Gerrry.

[faithlilly]

Yep, very important elite people involved almost certainly .... and they aint Kate and Gerrry.

But we can't possibly know that as as Brietta says SY would never give the public details of an ongoing investigation.

[sadie]

But we can't possibly know that as as Brietta says SY would never give the public details of an ongoing investigation.

Of Course we cant KNOW, but there are pointers.

Good night again

[Brietta]

But we can't possibly know that as as Brietta says SY would never give the public details of an ongoing investigation.

Good lord ... do you people listen to different news bulletins from those of us in the real world? ... the DCI was very specific about the people the Met had no interest in as were the PJ ... if you wish to pretend it is otherwise, that is your choice; but you do run the risk of appearing to be stuck in a bit of a rut.

[pegasus]

After the book about the Tsar and his family was published, it was proven by DNA analysis that Anna Anderson had no DNA link to the Tsar's family.

[faithlilly]

Good lord ... do you people listen to different news bulletins from those of us in the real world? ... the DCI was very specific about the people the Met had no interest in as were the PJ ... if you wish to pretend it is otherwise, that is your choice; but you do run the risk of appearing to be stuck in a bit of a rut.

But you have just posted yourself that SY do not give out information about an ongoing investigation.

Redwood didn't offer the information of his own free will. He was asked a direct question about the McCann's status in the investigation. What was he supposed to say ? No comment would have elicited just as much speculation as saying they hadn't been ruled out..

[Benice]

But you have just posted yourself that SY do not give out information about an ongoing investigation.

Redwood didn't offer the information of his own free will. He was asked a direct question about the McCann's status in the investigation. What was he supposed to say ? No comment would have elicited just as much speculation as saying they hadn't been ruled out..

Some sceptics efforts to convince themselves that black is actually white never cease to amaze me.

The policeman heading the Madeleine McCann investigation has publically ruled the parents and their friends out of their enquiries.  So have the PJ.     None of them were obliged to do that but they did -  and all the pedantic nitpicking in the world won't change it.     Try to get over it.

[Alfred R Jones]

The Met so don't want the McCanns to know that they are their prime suspects that they not only stated publicly that neither they nor their friends are suspects, but they then went to the trouble of making four Portuguese Nationals arguidos and the PT authorities happily went along with this ruse.   It's a plan so cunning you could stick a tail on it and call it a weasel. 

And some people are so deluded they actually believe this nonsense. 

[Alice Purjorick]

The Met so don't want the McCanns to know that they are their prime suspects that they not only stated publicly that neither they nor their friends are suspects, but they then went to the trouble of making four Portuguese Nationals arguidos and the PT authorities happily went along with this ruse.   It's a plan so cunning you could stick a tail on it and call it a weasel.

And some people are so deluded they actually believe this nonsense.

I thought foxes were cunning,weasels were weasily identified and stoats were stotaly different?
Some people are deluded enough to believe that there is a lot of evidence associated with this case pointing in whichever direction takes your fancy.
"Nature of crime unknown" so not enough evidence there then. Unless the pundits on here know something different because two police forces have taken them into their confidence of course.

[Jean-Pierre]

I thought foxes were cunning,weasels were weasily identified and stoats were stotaly different?
Some people are deluded enough to believe that there is a lot of evidence associated with this case pointing in whichever direction takes your fancy.
"Nature of crime unknown" so not enough evidence there then. Unless the pundits on here know something different because two police forces have taken them into their confidence of course.

I thought foxes were cunning,weasels were weasily identified and stoats were stotaly different?

Very clever 

[Alice Purjorick]

Even as we speak Stephen there will be holidaymakers who will be sitting with their Baby alarms on the table/bar - having left their children asleep in their rooms while they go for their evening meal.   And those people will NOT be checking on them every half an hour - they will be relying on their Alarms.      Some parents will have signed up for the baby listening service.

And as long as none of their children disappear whilst they are doing this - we will never ever hear a word  about them  -  and you can carry on posting - as if it's a fact -  that the  McCanns are the only parents on the planet who ever used this  method  of  baby-checking.

More than a few hotels now no longer provide this service on the grounds it is an unsafe practice.