Jeremy Bamber - The Campaigner Blog

[Nicholas]

Bamber Book Club from 15th October 2013 http://jeremybambercampaigner.blogspot.com/2013/10/

”I do love a good read and write session, you know. That’s why I made a blog after all. Can’t beat a good book.

So it got me thinking: What if Jeremiah Bamberoonie (Jeremy Bamber to you and I) wrote himself a book about the adventures, thrills and spills of the last 30-or-so years? What form might it take?

After all, that whole suffering the devastating loss of your whole family with absolutely no victim support, being accused of killing them with absolutely no evidence whatsoever and then imprisoned for life for it – despite that imprisonment being totally illegal in itself….  Yes, I’m sure that’s a real squeal of a tale and would give 50 Shades a run for its money in terms of sauce!

Seriously,  Jeremy will be free soon enough, that’s for sure, and if he ever feels like penning his story then it will definitely shame a lot of people. For now, we can only speculate. It could look like this, for instance:

Sort of like an Alcatraz-cum-Shawshank excitement feel to it, don’t you think? I like the idea that it’s all about to change and that for the clutch of weirdos who happily made this happen to him there will be no way back. So yes, I suspect it might be something like that.

If that’s the ‘good eggs’, what about the ‘bad eggs’? Any idea what their book would look like?

Well, funny you should ask – cos I’ve managed to snare me a copy. I did enquire originally if I could be sent a copy but was told that they had all been destroyed/could not be traced, and yet low and behold, I found it! Bit of a recurring theme.

Anyway, here it is:

The ‘explains-all’ textbook on how to imprison Jeremy Bamber. Would go very nicely with the Cooking with Jeremy tutorial, from a past blog.

Just as well it’s an idiot’s guide, eh?



What’s Under That Corgi 11th Sept 2013

”We’re told in fantasy land that Jeremy Bamber is a bad sort who spends his days biting the heads off baby chicks and spitting out the beaks, or whatever it is that bad sorts do…

Anyway, full from chick heads and after implausibly and miraculously managing to murder his entire family without anyone having any evidence whatsoever and there being no witnesses, he also managed to fool the world into thinking his sister, Sheila, had actually committed the murders in a psychotic episode.

Yes he fooled them all – including one fellow by the name of Prof. Peter Vanezis who was the case pathologist. You see – obviously blinded by Bad Bamber’s brilliance rather than the actual truth – Vanezis ruled that indeed, it was a case of four murders and one suicide; that the “two gunshot wound” issue was no screaming anomaly to him and that, indeed, he had seen the same thing a number of times prior. He added Sheila would even have been able to move and walk for a short time after administering a first shot to herself.

Even when told by those clever coppers wot rumbled Bamber’s evil scheme that it was actually he who’d done it, he stated the theory was “almost too incredible to believe” and that for it to occur in this way; she would have to be under the influence of drugs (she was not) and that Jeremy would have to be a "nutter" (he is not).

So then I was thinkin’ to myself. He’s got it wrong – he must  have – everyone says Jeremy did it and why would they lie? It’s not like they anyone had motive or anything *cough*.

Then it clicked. It’s not the first time this man Vanezis has got a biggun’ wrong. He was called in to help investigate the death of Princess Diana and, here in fantasy land, that one’s not all it seems either. Some tabloids say the Queen did it, with a pistol smothered under a Corgi, others say it was the SAS and some argue she isn’t even dead!

So yes, I reasoned to myself. That’s it – if Jeremy Bamber was the murderer then Princess Diana is sat here next to me in fantasy land, the pair of us rocking brand new pink shorts from Primark and soaking up the rays. (I assume that’s what she’d do).

In reality of course (hello real world)… Peter Vanezis didn’t get either case wrong – that’s probably cos he’s good at his job, has done leading work for the Home Office and was named an OBE! Hardly an amateur.

Diana, sadly, is no longer with us and, for once, silly season should come and go without the tabloids hounding her from beyond her grave. Tragically, Sheila, Daniel, Nicholas, Nevill and June are all no longer with us, either – and Jeremy had about as much to do with their death as the Queen’s Corgi did with Diana’s.

So let’s stop the Bamber bashing HOBNOB, let’s allow Jeremy to finally grieve fully, as an innocent man…
http://jeremybambercampaigner.blogspot.com/2013/09/


5,000 So Soon? 27th May 2013
 
”Alright there my blogger mates? Just thought I would pop my head around the door and see how we were doing and make brief mention of the number 5,000.

 Five thousand indeed. What's that, you say? "Is that number of reasons I can count to say that Jeremy Bamber is innocent?" Nope. Close, but nope.

" Is that the number of fabricated lies, stories and fantasies spread by Police, ex girlfriend, Jessica Fletcher and Hercule Poirot?"  Well, you're getting warmer but nope.

"5,000, Mr Blogger man, is that the number of approximate attempts it takes to spell 'scene' correctly in the Annual Essex Police Spelling Bee?" That's VERY good! But not the one I'm after...

 No, no... 5,000 is the number of page views this here blog has had since we started the whole thing and began taking the royal p*ss out of people who should really, really have known better 27 years ago than to start messing about with something so seriously. A modest start. but it'll do.

Sadly for you naughty guys and gals, though: it may have taken 27 years but the truth is finally getting out. The clock ticks, the tide turns, and you, my lovelies, are screwed! Oops!
http://jeremybambercampaigner.blogspot.com/2013/05/5000-so-soon.html#comment-form


3 comments
Poppy Ann Miller 28 May 2013 at 09:31
5,000! Well done Mr Blogger man but just to say some of us are blogger women #:-}

Reply
The Campaigner 9 June 2013 at 08:22
Too true and I should know better!

Reply
Jonny 9 July 2013 at 20:25
Appreciate your effort on all of this. It's sobering reading, when you look beyond the humour.

[Caroline]

Bamber Book Club from 15th October 2013 http://jeremybambercampaigner.blogspot.com/2013/10/

”I do love a good read and write session, you know. That’s why I made a blog after all. Can’t beat a good book.

So it got me thinking: What if Jeremiah Bamberoonie (Jeremy Bamber to you and I) wrote himself a book about the adventures, thrills and spills of the last 30-or-so years? What form might it take?

After all, that whole suffering the devastating loss of your whole family with absolutely no victim support, being accused of killing them with absolutely no evidence whatsoever and then imprisoned for life for it – despite that imprisonment being totally illegal in itself….  Yes, I’m sure that’s a real squeal of a tale and would give 50 Shades a run for its money in terms of sauce!

Seriously,  Jeremy will be free soon enough, that’s for sure, and if he ever feels like penning his story then it will definitely shame a lot of people. For now, we can only speculate. It could look like this, for instance:

Sort of like an Alcatraz-cum-Shawshank excitement feel to it, don’t you think? I like the idea that it’s all about to change and that for the clutch of weirdos who happily made this happen to him there will be no way back. So yes, I suspect it might be something like that.

If that’s the ‘good eggs’, what about the ‘bad eggs’? Any idea what their book would look like?

Well, funny you should ask – cos I’ve managed to snare me a copy. I did enquire originally if I could be sent a copy but was told that they had all been destroyed/could not be traced, and yet low and behold, I found it! Bit of a recurring theme.

Anyway, here it is:

The ‘explains-all’ textbook on how to imprison Jeremy Bamber. Would go very nicely with the Cooking with Jeremy tutorial, from a past blog.

Just as well it’s an idiot’s guide, eh?



What’s Under That Corgi 11th Sept 2013

”We’re told in fantasy land that Jeremy Bamber is a bad sort who spends his days biting the heads off baby chicks and spitting out the beaks, or whatever it is that bad sorts do…

Anyway, full from chick heads and after implausibly and miraculously managing to murder his entire family without anyone having any evidence whatsoever and there being no witnesses, he also managed to fool the world into thinking his sister, Sheila, had actually committed the murders in a psychotic episode.

Yes he fooled them all – including one fellow by the name of Prof. Peter Vanezis who was the case pathologist. You see – obviously blinded by Bad Bamber’s brilliance rather than the actual truth – Vanezis ruled that indeed, it was a case of four murders and one suicide; that the “two gunshot wound” issue was no screaming anomaly to him and that, indeed, he had seen the same thing a number of times prior. He added Sheila would even have been able to move and walk for a short time after administering a first shot to herself.

Even when told by those clever coppers wot rumbled Bamber’s evil scheme that it was actually he who’d done it, he stated the theory was “almost too incredible to believe” and that for it to occur in this way; she would have to be under the influence of drugs (she was not) and that Jeremy would have to be a "nutter" (he is not).

So then I was thinkin’ to myself. He’s got it wrong – he must  have – everyone says Jeremy did it and why would they lie? It’s not like they anyone had motive or anything *cough*.

Then it clicked. It’s not the first time this man Vanezis has got a biggun’ wrong. He was called in to help investigate the death of Princess Diana and, here in fantasy land, that one’s not all it seems either. Some tabloids say the Queen did it, with a pistol smothered under a Corgi, others say it was the SAS and some argue she isn’t even dead!

So yes, I reasoned to myself. That’s it – if Jeremy Bamber was the murderer then Princess Diana is sat here next to me in fantasy land, the pair of us rocking brand new pink shorts from Primark and soaking up the rays. (I assume that’s what she’d do).

In reality of course (hello real world)… Peter Vanezis didn’t get either case wrong – that’s probably cos he’s good at his job, has done leading work for the Home Office and was named an OBE! Hardly an amateur.

Diana, sadly, is no longer with us and, for once, silly season should come and go without the tabloids hounding her from beyond her grave. Tragically, Sheila, Daniel, Nicholas, Nevill and June are all no longer with us, either – and Jeremy had about as much to do with their death as the Queen’s Corgi did with Diana’s.

So let’s stop the Bamber bashing HOBNOB, let’s allow Jeremy to finally grieve fully, as an innocent man…
http://jeremybambercampaigner.blogspot.com/2013/09/


5,000 So Soon? 27th May 2013
 
”Alright there my blogger mates? Just thought I would pop my head around the door and see how we were doing and make brief mention of the number 5,000.

 Five thousand indeed. What's that, you say? "Is that number of reasons I can count to say that Jeremy Bamber is innocent?" Nope. Close, but nope.

" Is that the number of fabricated lies, stories and fantasies spread by Police, ex girlfriend, Jessica Fletcher and Hercule Poirot?"  Well, you're getting warmer but nope.

"5,000, Mr Blogger man, is that the number of approximate attempts it takes to spell 'scene' correctly in the Annual Essex Police Spelling Bee?" That's VERY good! But not the one I'm after...

 No, no... 5,000 is the number of page views this here blog has had since we started the whole thing and began taking the royal p*ss out of people who should really, really have known better 27 years ago than to start messing about with something so seriously. A modest start. but it'll do.

Sadly for you naughty guys and gals, though: it may have taken 27 years but the truth is finally getting out. The clock ticks, the tide turns, and you, my lovelies, are screwed! Oops!
http://jeremybambercampaigner.blogspot.com/2013/05/5000-so-soon.html#comment-form


3 comments
Poppy Ann Miller 28 May 2013 at 09:31
5,000! Well done Mr Blogger man but just to say some of us are blogger women #:-}

Reply
The Campaigner 9 June 2013 at 08:22
Too true and I should know better!

Reply
Jonny 9 July 2013 at 20:25
Appreciate your effort on all of this. It's sobering reading, when you look beyond the humour.

What a load of old crap  - what a sad bunch they are!

[Nicholas]

Was Aunt Agatha in contact with him at this stage ?

Would be interested to hear what she knows about these ‘events’


The dirty side of prison; cleaning after a dirty protest
“In the UK, prison authorities are responsible for the welfare of inmates during their detainment. This includes the provision of hygienic prison and holding cells. While it’s not always possible to stop a dirty protest from happening, it is essential for the clean up and disinfection of the affected areas as soon as possible to help prevent the spread of disease, which is a particular risk in confined spaces like prisons.

Tuberculosis, HIV, and Hepatitis C are just some of the risks to prison staff and other inmates during a dirty protest where bodily fluids, including blood and faeces, are smeared across cell walls or even communal areas.

Cleaning the affected areas requires specialist personal protective equipment (PPE) and the necessary products and equipment to fully clean and sanatise the areas.
https://www.idealresponse.co.uk/blog/the-dirty-side-of-prison-cleaning-after-a-dirty-protest/

Hi Aunt Agatha while you’re here can you clarify the above?

What did Bamber tell you about his ’protests’ ?

[Aunt Agatha]

Hi Aunt Agatha while you’re here can you clarify the above?

What did Bamber tell you about his ’protests’ ?

I have nothing to add.

[Nicholas]

The dirty protests were in Frankland in Durham so quite early on in his career.

He seems to have been to Frankland or Durham 3 times?

https://jeremybamber.blogspot.com/2010/06/in-25-years-ive-slept-in-122-different.html

[Nicholas]

I have nothing to add.

You clearly do

[Nicholas]

What a load of old crap  - what a sad bunch they are!

Poppy Ann Miller™
@PoppyMeze
Replying to
@Bambertweets
Tried 2 respond like a grown-up bt can't do it without expletives.My opinion?
Collusion in high places.BUT we're going nowhere
4:25 PM · Oct 15, 2016·Twitter Web Client
https://mobile.twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/787313445578412032

Found this interesting

The only ‘collusion’ that’s been going on is by Bamber & his CT and that ‘high place’ they see themselves in

”Grandiosity and an elevated self-focus are key components of narcissism. The way in which narcissists view themselves, however, also reflects the way they view other people. In order to see themselves as superior, they, by definition, must see everyone else as beneath them.

“People high in narcissism, though, have a more grandiose set of needs that include a sense of entitlement, a tendency to exploit others, and unusual sensitivity to criticism. 
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201806/why-do-narcissists-need-outdo-everyone-else

[Caroline]

Poppy Ann Miller™
@PoppyMeze
Replying to
@Bambertweets
Tried 2 respond like a grown-up bt can't do it without expletives.My opinion?
Collusion in high places.BUT we're going nowhere
4:25 PM · Oct 15, 2016·Twitter Web Client
https://mobile.twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/787313445578412032

Found this interesting

The only ‘collusion’ that’s been going on is by Bamber & his CT and that ‘high place’ they see themselves in

”Grandiosity and an elevated self-focus are key components of narcissism. The way in which narcissists view themselves, however, also reflects the way they view other people. In order to see themselves as superior, they, by definition, must see everyone else as beneath them.

“People high in narcissism, though, have a more grandiose set of needs that include a sense of entitlement, a tendency to exploit others, and unusual sensitivity to criticism. 
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201806/why-do-narcissists-need-outdo-everyone-else

At least she acknowledges the direction in which they are headed 

[Nicholas]

The dirty protests were in Frankland in Durham so quite early on in his career.

It’s referred to as ‘Franklin’ prison here (transcribed interview with Bamber)

Have you had any physical assaults ?

“One in Franklin – from a guard, not a prisoner. It was a Control and Restraint technique. I smashed up my cell and went on a shit protest. It was to do with my case – a daft protest really when I look back at it. I asked for it. Apart from that, in all these years, I’ve never been touched.”

[Nicholas]

Did you ever blog Aunt Agatha ?

[Aunt Agatha]

Did you ever blog Aunt Agatha ?

LOL. I've never blogged!

[ISpyWithMyEye]

It’s referred to as ‘Franklin’ prison here (transcribed interview with Bamber)

Have you had any physical assaults ?

“One in Franklin – from a guard, not a prisoner. It was a Control and Restraint technique. I smashed up my cell and went on a shit protest. It was to do with my case – a daft protest really when I look back at it. I asked for it. Apart from that, in all these years, I’ve never been touched.”

Look how he plays down his protest when he covered himself in faeces and smashed up his cell.

He’s trying to make it sound like high jinks a schoolboy would do: “it was DAFT really “

He was a MAN, mid 30s, defecating and smearing faeces all over his naked body — and he calls that just DAFT?

It’s SICK, disgusting, vile, and where did it get him? Nowhere.

Personally, I think they should have just left him like that in his cell for six months and slid basic food and water through his door...daft, innit?

[Nicholas]

Look how he plays down his protest when he covered himself in faeces and smashed up his cell.

He’s trying to make it sound like high jinks a schoolboy would do: “it was DAFT really “

He was a MAN, mid 30s, defecating and smearing faeces all over his naked body — and he calls that just DAFT?

It’s SICK, disgusting, vile, and where did it get him? Nowhere.

Personally, I think they should have just left him like that in his cell for six months and slid basic food and water through his door...daft, innit?

Didn’t appear to bother Aunt Agatha either; though admittedly she hasn’t made comment on these facts?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Didn’t appear to bother Aunt Agatha either; though admittedly she hasn’t made comment on these facts?

I wonder if he got his faeces in his hair?


How long was he covered in it for?


Days, wasn’t it?🤮

[Nicholas]

I wonder if he got his faeces in his hair?


How long was he covered in it for?


Days, wasn’t it?🤮

Don’t know if he wore a shower cap or some other protective covering - am guessing he didn’t in a prison cell ?

Appears Aunt Agatha pretends it didn’t happen ?