McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[slartibartfast]

that line does not seem to apply to the first sentence...so as long as  stephen is saying their human rights have not been breached in his opinion...thats fine

So there was an IMO in sight.

[Mr Gray]

So there was an IMO in sight.

not for the inititial statement no...stephen can confirm if he thinks its fact or merely opinion

[slartibartfast]

not for the inititial statement no...stephen can confirm if he thinks its fact or merely opinion

Not what you said.

[slartibartfast]

no they would not...that is for the ECHR to decide...you need to read the acceptance criteria..they need to show their human rights MAY have been not considered

I assume you read the judgement and the references to the various parts of the act?

[Mr Gray]

I assume you read the judgement and the references to the various parts of the act?

I have read the acceptance criteria...so first... on what basis would the case not be accepted.

[slartibartfast]

I have read the acceptance criteria...so first... on what basis would the case not be accepted.

Significant Damage.

[Mr Gray]

I assume you read the judgement and the references to the various parts of the act?

yes

[Mr Gray]

Significant Damage.

there has been significant damage to their reputation

[Alice Purjorick]

I have read the acceptance criteria...so first... on what basis would the case not be accepted.

“manifestly ill-founded”

[slartibartfast]

there has been significant damage to their reputation

But the supporters tell us that there are only a handful of sceptics, no one believes the book and the McCanns have lots of support. Difficult to square that with significant damage.

[Mr Gray]

“manifestly ill-founded”

if thats what you think lets wait and see...have you looked at the cases that have been judged as such....lets wait and see who is  the fool and who is the wise man... Im more than happy for this to be decided based on this

[Mr Gray]

But the supporters tell us that there are only a handful of sceptics, no one believes the book and the McCanns have lots of support. Difficult to square that with significant damage.

its not...amaral accuses criminal action and libel per se ...as with alice im happy to accept the challenge ...you say it wont be accepted and I say it will...lets see who is the fool and who is the wise man

[Alice Purjorick]

if thats what you think lets wait and see...have you looked at the cases that have been judged as such....lets wait and see who is  the fool and who is the wise man... Im more than happy for this to be decided based on this

Unless you have had sight of the actual application you are in no position to make an informed comment on the topic.
So shoot us a link to the application, Ace.

[Mr Gray]

Unless you have had sight of the actual application you are in no position to make an informed comment on the topic.
So shoot us a link to the application, Ace.

im giving my opinion ..and you yours...lets see who is right... the case wiil be accepted   100% imo

[Alice Purjorick]

its not...amaral accuses criminal action and libel per se ...as with alice im happy to accept the challenge ...you say it wont be accepted and I say it will...lets see who is the fool and who is the wise man

Remind us what happened when the case went to court in Portugal.