McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[Mr Gray]

I have.

Their human rights have not been breached and they were not treated unfairly by the supreme Court.

They are on a hiding to nothing, which in my opinion is what they so fully deserve.

Your post is opinion as fact and is against forum rules...It is not up to you to rule on human rights issues...you are not a judge ,... Im happy to abide by the rules but they should be enforced fairly...your post is reported as opinion posted as fact

[Mr Gray]

I have.

Their human rights have not been breached and they were not treated unfairly by the supreme Court.

They are on a hiding to nothing, which in my opinion is what they so fully deserve.

so on what basis will their application not be accepted

" their human rights have not been affected" ...is not a basis for refusal

[stephen25000]

Your post is opinion as fact and is against forum rules...It is not up to you to rule on human rights issues...you are not a judge

I said , in my opinion, in the post.


You are also implying you know the law.

That is your opinion, nothing more.

[Mr Gray]

I said , in my opinion, in the post.


You are also implying you know the law.

That is your opinion, nothing more.

I do know the acceptance criteria...its online....so on what basis will their application be refused

[slartibartfast]

It would be interesting to see examples of successful appeals to the ECHR by people instigating legal actions and failing.

[Mr Gray]

I said , in my opinion, in the post.


You are also implying you know the law.

That is your opinion, nothing more.

your post..
I have.

Their human rights have not been breached and they were not treated unfairly by the supreme Court.

They are on a hiding to nothing, which in my opinion is what they so fully deserve.

not an imo in sight

[slartibartfast]

I do know the acceptance criteria...its online....so on what basis will their application be refused

I think the ECHR will look at the careful consideration the Judgement took of European Human Rights legislation and chuck the request out.

[slartibartfast]

your post..
I have.

Their human rights have not been breached and they were not treated unfairly by the supreme Court.

They are on a hiding to nothing, which in my opinion is what they so fully deserve.

not an imo in sight

Yes there is?

[Mr Gray]

I think the ECHR will look at the careful consideration the Judgement took of European Human Rights legislation and chuck the request out.

That is not a basis to refuse acceptance of the case...have you read the criteria before commenting...it would apear not..imo

[Mr Gray]

Yes there is?

could you point out where it is

I have.

Their human rights have not been breached and they were not treated unfairly by the supreme Court.

They are on a hiding to nothing, which in my opinion is what they so fully deserve.

[G-Unit]

so on what basis will their application not be accepted

" their human rights have not been affected" ...is not a basis for refusal

As they have allegedly applied to the European Court of Human Rights the criteria must be that their human rights were breached. Anything else is irrelevant.

[slartibartfast]

could you point out where it is

I have.

Their human rights have not been breached and they were not treated unfairly by the supreme Court.

They are on a hiding to nothing, which in my opinion is what they so fully deserve.

[slartibartfast]

That is not a basis to refuse acceptance of the case...have you read the criteria before commenting...it would apear not..imo

They would need to demonstrate that their Human Rights had not been considered.

[Mr Gray]

that line does not seem to apply to the first sentence...so as long as  stephen is saying their human rights have not been breached in his opinion...thats fine

[Mr Gray]

They would need to demonstrate that their Human Rights had not been considered.

no they would not...that is for the ECHR to decide...you need to read the acceptance criteria..they need to show their human rights MAY have been not considered