so now you have changed from me stating something...to me implying something.....my post is clear.....the ECHR cannot overr rule any domestic court decision....and I have never said or implied it can...it can rule that the decision was incorrect and not in line with ECHR law...that could then affect any future rulings
Can you show me where your above claim that the ECHR cannot overrule any domestic decision is written below as I can't find this. You however have mentioned that the country's courts judgement was legally binding up to the moment it was made. That doesn't make much sense unless you are claiming that "it" is the ECHR decision, making the SC decisions invalid. No mention of future rulings only an end point to the existing SC decisions IMO
its legally binding up to the moment it was made but can be corrected by the ECHR....I believe two SC decisions have been corrected in the last few months