McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[Snowgirl]

And posters have continually posted... They won't apply... They have no case... It won't be accepted... I'm simply giving the other side.... And at least my opinion is based on cases I have cited....

Isn’t each case different?  How many of the cases you have looked at have been comparable to the McCanns ?

[Mr Gray]

The reason Gerry was not allowed to rubbish the dogs was because it was not part of the case.

It was in the book and the documentary... With false claims made Re their reliability.. It will be interesting to see what the ECHR make of it

[Mr Gray]

Isn’t each case different?  How many of the cases you have looked at have been comparable to the McCanns ?

How many cases have you looked at.... I've posted a li k to a list of them and they make very interesting reading.
They show that the ECHRwill look at the evidence that supports amarals claims and whether he had presented a balanced view

[slartibartfast]

It was in the book and the documentary... With false claims made Re their reliability.. It will be interesting to see what the ECHR make of it

The crux of any case will be, did the PT SC fail to consider any of the rights in play.

[Mr Gray]

The crux of any case will be, did the PT SC fail to consider any of the rights in play.

No... They did consider them... It's whether they got the balance right

[Snowgirl]

How many cases have you looked at.... I've posted a li k to a list of them and they make very interesting reading.
They show that the ECHRwill look at the evidence that supports amarals claims and whether he had presented a balanced view

I completely disagree with what you’re claiming the ECHR will do but I’m not going to bang on about it any further  for the sake of my sanity .

[slartibartfast]

No... They did consider them... It's whether they got the balance right

For which they need to take account of the source of the information complained about.

[Mr Gray]

For which they need to take account of the source of the information complained about.

Where's, the source for the dogs solving 200 cases... Remember the files said the alerts had no evidential value.... Amaral ignored the parts of the official files that didn't support his view and therefore did not present a balanced view

[Montclair]

It was in the book and the documentary... With false claims made Re their reliability.. It will be interesting to see what the ECHR make of it

I give up, you refuse to understand. The ECHR will be concerned with human rights not with the investigation or the dogs!

[Mr Gray]

I give up, you refuse to understand. The ECHR will be concerned with human rights not with the investigation or the dogs!

The only way they can assess a breach of human rights us to decide if amarals wiews, were supported by evidence and balance.... You are the one who refuses to accept reality... Imo

[slartibartfast]

The only way they can assess a breach of human rights us to decide if amarals wiews, were supported by evidence and balance.... You are the one who refuses to accept reality... Imo

Wrong, you want them to act as a Court of fourth instance which leads to inadmissibility.

[Mr Gray]

Wrong, you want them to act as a Court of fourth instance which leads to inadmissibility.

I'm not wrong at all... Explain why you THINK... I'm wrong..

It's a basic 8 vs 10....nothing to do with 4th instance.... Plus perhaps the presumption  of innocence

[slartibartfast]

I'm not wrong at all... Explain why you THINK... I'm wrong..

It's a basic 8 vs 10....nothing to do with 4th instance.... Plus perhaps the presumption  of innocence

You want them to review the evidence which is fourth instance.

[jassi]

It's certainly going to be fun on here when this application gets rejected.

[Alice Purjorick]

That's all right then Davel.  You say this time and time again but it is still only your opinion after all.

Which changes with the wind.
It's moved along way over 152 pages.