McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[Snowgirl]

Yes... The dogs purpose is to find evidence.... That's, what Grime says he trains then for.. You seem to have made the same mistake ad amaral... Attaching too much importance  to the alerts

Odd don't  you think  that the dogs only showed an interest in 5a ,none of the other apartments?

[Eleanor]

Odd don't  you think  that the dogs only showed an interest in 5a ,none of the other apartments?

Chance might have been a fine thing.

[Mr Gray]

Odd don't  you think  that the dogs only showed an interest in 5a ,none of the other apartments?

No... I've explained exactly why before

[Snowgirl]

No... I've explained exactly why before

Perhaps before I became a member ?

[Eleanor]

Perhaps before I became a member ?

There is a search facility.

[ShiningInLuz]

There is a search facility.

And what should Snowgirl search for?

[Mr Gray]

And what should Snowgirl search for?

Snowgirl doesn't have to search... She can ask me... Haven't you ever seen the explanation... Supplied by the PJ

[ShiningInLuz]

Snowgirl doesn't have to search... She can ask me... Haven't you ever seen the explanation... Supplied by the PJ

You chose not to explain it earlier.

[Mr Gray]

You chose not to explain it earlier.

Cite... I didnt

[Alice Purjorick]

But not afforded to the McCanns.. Have you read the application to annul the SC judgement

1) How do you figure that out?
2) Yes!. Well that which is bandied about on that tinternet.

[Mr Gray]

1) How do you figure that out?
2) Yes!. Well that which is bandied about on that tinternet.

Have you read the answer to the appeal to annul the SC verdict... It's there... English translation with the original Portuguese

[Alice Purjorick]

According to the McCann's lawyers an archiving under 277/1 equals a legally binding declaration of innocence. Not only that, it's res judicata (a case in which there has been a final judgment and is no longer subject to appeal). So the police and the prosecutors declared them innocent according to their lawyers.

Article 277 - Archiving of the investigation

1 - The Public Ministry shall, by dispatch, close the investigation, as soon as it has gathered sufficient evidence that the crime was not confirmed, that the arguido did not practice it in any way or that the procedure is legally inadmissible.....

As far as the appellants are aware of, the archiving at stake was carried out, in the course of the investigation, because sufficient proof had been gathered that the then arguidos did not commit any facts of a criminal relevance...

That is to say, therefore, that the filing order uttered according to article 277-1 of the CPP, after the deadline of article 278 (10) of the same legal compendium, is res judicata and is only subject to review according to the terms of articles 279 and 449-2 of the CPP.
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Annulment_request.htm

"Res judicata" it most certainly was not/ is not.

[Mr Gray]

"Res judicata" it most certainly was not/ is not.

And the McCanns never claimed it was a legally binding declaration of innocens as gunit has claimed

[Mr Gray]

According to the McCann's lawyers an archiving under 277/1 equals a legally binding declaration of innocence. Not only that, it's res judicata (a case in which there has been a final judgment and is no longer subject to appeal). So the police and the prosecutors declared them innocent according to their lawyers.

Article 277 - Archiving of the investigation

1 - The Public Ministry shall, by dispatch, close the investigation, as soon as it has gathered sufficient evidence that the crime was not confirmed, that the arguido did not practice it in any way or that the procedure is legally inadmissible.....

As far as the appellants are aware of, the archiving at stake was carried out, in the course of the investigation, because sufficient proof had been gathered that the then arguidos did not commit any facts of a criminal relevance...

That is to say, therefore, that the filing order uttered according to article 277-1 of the CPP, after the deadline of article 278 (10) of the same legal compendium, is res judicata and is only subject to review according to the terms of articles 279 and 449-2 of the CPP.
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Annulment_request.htm

Did the McCanns lawyers, actually use this term... Res judicata... Do you have a cite... Or was it another paraphrase by Anne

[Alice Purjorick]

Did the McCanns lawyers, actually use this term... Res judicata... Do you have a cite... Or was it another paraphrase by Anne

I love the idea of "res judicata" being a paraphrase. [no suitable emoji is available]