McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[Mr Gray]

I love the idea of "res judicata" being a paraphrase. [no suitable emoji is available]

The question is... Did the McCanns lawyers use it... Do you have a cite... Or do you have a hat you could eat

[Mr Gray]

According to the McCann's lawyers an archiving under 277/1 equals a legally binding declaration of innocence. Not only that, it's res judicata (a case in which there has been a final judgment and is no longer subject to appeal). So the police and the prosecutors declared them innocent according to their lawyers.

Article 277 - Archiving of the investigation

1 - The Public Ministry shall, by dispatch, close the investigation, as soon as it has gathered sufficient evidence that the crime was not confirmed, that the arguido did not practice it in any way or that the procedure is legally inadmissible.....

As far as the appellants are aware of, the archiving at stake was carried out, in the course of the investigation, because sufficient proof had been gathered that the then arguidos did not commit any facts of a criminal relevance...

That is to say, therefore, that the filing order uttered according to article 277-1 of the CPP, after the deadline of article 278 (10) of the same legal compendium, is res judicata and is only subject to review according to the terms of articles 279 and 449-2 of the CPP.
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Annulment_request.htm

I'm fairly sure you are quoting Anne Gueddes res judicata... Those words do not seem to appear on page, 7 in the Portuguese

[G-Unit]

Did the McCanns lawyers, actually use this term... Res judicata... Do you have a cite... Or was it another paraphrase by Anne

Page 7
forca de caso julgado

[Mr Gray]

Page 7
forca de caso julgado

So what is the translation of caso julgado... Are you sure your translation is accurate

[Mr Gray]

Page 7
forca de caso julgado

You have repeatedly quoted Res judicata.... But the McCanns lawyers never used the phrase

[Mr Gray]

I love the idea of "res judicata" being a paraphrase. [no suitable emoji is available]

Looks like you need to eat your hat

[Alice Purjorick]

Looks like you need to eat your hat

Why?
res judicata is Latin with a specific meaning at law.

[Alice Purjorick]

The question is... Did the McCanns lawyers use it... Do you have a cite... Or do you have a hat you could eat

Show me where I said they did.

[Mr Gray]

Why?
res judicata is Latin with a specific meaning at law.

We know that..looks like McCanns lawyer never used the term and Anne gueddes used it as a paraphrase

[Mr Gray]

Show me where I said they did.

Show me where I said you did

[Alice Purjorick]

So what is the translation of caso julgado... Are you sure your translation is accurate

Plug it into Google translate and see what comes up.
"forca de caso julgado" = "res judicata"

Wait for it; wait for it.

[Montclair]

The correct translation of res judicata is força de caso julgado which is the quality conferred to a judicial sentence against which there are no more appeals and cannot be changed and is indiscutable. This is the argument used by the McCanns that the archiving report had the "força de caso julgado" and which the Tribunal da Relação and the SC ruled against.

[G-Unit]

The correct translation of res judicata is força de caso julgado which is the quality conferred to a judicial sentence against which there are no more appeals and cannot be changed and is indiscutable. This is the argument used by the McCanns that the archiving report had the "força de caso julgado" and which the Tribunal da Relação and the SC ruled against.

They were quite clear in their rejection;

This is why it was judged in the ruling that it would not seem acceptable to consider that the order should be treated as a demonstration of acquittal.
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/STJ_21_03_2017_Rejected.htm

[Alice Purjorick]

They were quite clear in their rejection;

This is why it was judged in the ruling that it would not seem acceptable to consider that the order should be treated as a demonstration of acquittal.
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/STJ_21_03_2017_Rejected.htm

"the appellants condemned at the expense of the incident which they gave rise to".
Interesting.

[Mr Gray]

They were quite clear in their rejection;

This is why it was judged in the ruling that it would not seem acceptable to consider that the order should be treated as a demonstration of acquittal.
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/STJ_21_03_2017_Rejected.htm

It's an incidentalissue as they are entitled to the presumption of innocence... I don't see anywhere they regards it as proof of innocence