McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[Snowgirl]

I would say there is enough evidence  to show there is a case..particularly the referral to the case in the accounts... Abd looking at the evidence I can see no reason why it would be rejected... Can you

That referral to the case in the accounts? Can you direct us to it ?

[Sunny]

I would say there is enough evidence  to show there is a case..particularly the referral to the case in the accounts... Abd looking at the evidence I can see no reason why it would be rejected... Can you

Davel I could never say I was a lawyer so would not presume to say whether the McCanns would have a case or not.   I could probably cherry pick cases to support my argument.

[Mr Gray]

That referral to the case in the accounts? Can you direct us to it ?

It was cited last week.

[Mr Gray]

Davel I could never say I was a lawyer so would not presume to say whether the McCanns would have a case or not.   I could probably cherry pick cases to support my argument.

I doubt you could cherry pick any... Feel free to prove me wrong... There are plenty of non lawyers, saying the McCanns don't have a case

[Alice Purjorick]

That referral to the case in the accounts? Can you direct us to it ?

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/FUND_2017.htm

Section 4 page 5.
Spot that weeks "deliberate error" !

[Snowgirl]

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/FUND_2017.htm

Section 4 page 5.
Spot that weeks "deliberate error" !

I’ve seen the accounts. It’s just that I can’t fathom how there’s evidence in there re what Davel claims .

[Mr Gray]

I’ve seen the accounts. It’s just that I can’t fathom how there’s evidence in there re what Davel claims .

Look at the very bottom of page 5

[G-Unit]

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/FUND_2017.htm

Section 4 page 5.
Spot that weeks "deliberate error" !

Ah yes. Stating opinion/hope as fact.

[Snowgirl]

Look at the very bottom of page 5

You  mean page 7 ...also numbered Page 5 ?
Got it now. 

[Alice Purjorick]

Ah yes. Stating opinion/hope as fact.

A couple of nifty bits of misdirection imo.

[Alice Purjorick]

Who has the latest S.P on this then?

[misty]

Who has the latest S.P on this then?

Nothing as yet. It's not on the list of judgements to be published next week so the wait continues.

[barrier]

Who has the latest S.P on this then?

Think a simple poll could be added,which'll happen first.
1)Arrest's in the Madeleine case.
2)The case is heard in the ECHR.
3)We get a new primeminister

My money's on 3.

[Miss Taken Identity]

Think a simple poll could be added,which'll happen first.
1)Arrest's in the Madeleine case.
2)The case is heard in the ECHR.
3)We get a new primeminister

My money's on 3.

I was more inmclined to believe that the choices would be:
1. dead paedo did it - no need for arrests
2. ECHR are rushing through this highly diplomatic induced case(we could end up going to war with Portugual over this)
3. Pigs were seen flying over apartment 5a- one fell and blood was splattered everywhere.

Hmm tough choices.

The ECHR will NOT be making a rush through job just to suit the McCanns and then , yes even then, they will not be declared 'innocent' of anything as is always claimed by some.

[Sunny]

I was more inmclined to believe that the choices would be:
1. dead paedo did it - no need for arrests
2. ECHR are rushing through this highly diplomatic induced case(we could end up going to war with Portugual over this)
3. Pigs were seen flying over apartment 5a- one fell and blood was splattered everywhere.

Hmm tough choices.

The ECHR will NOT be making a rush through job just to suit the McCanns and then , yes even then, they will not be declared 'innocent' of anything as is always claimed by some.

I agree with everything you hare written Faithlilly. I also believe unless their request gets thrown back at the first hurdle it could be up to another 3 years before an answer is given by the ECHR.  If their request is deemed inadmissible then we may never hear, as some applications are considered confidential,  therefore this thread could go on indefinitely.