McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[barrier]

What relavence diesvthe ongoing case have do you think

That wasn't the question posed,did any of the cases involved have as a concern an ongoing criminal investigation.

[G-Unit]

You need to look at sone of the cases I have provided the link to..
Defamation... Was the SC correct to give more wieght to amarals right under article 10 than the mccanns rights under 8... To reach that decision the, ECHR Wil look at the validity if the claims made by amaral.....

The SC reached their judgement... The ECHR will look at the judgement abd decide if they think amaral had the right to make those claims... Looking at previous judgements... I don't think he has

You seem to think the SC tried the case. They didn't. They upheld the Appeal Court decision by rejecting Duarte's arguments against it.

[Venturi Swirl]

Did the McCann's lawyer make that point? If she didn't the courts wouldn't address it. They only consider the evidence which is presented.

It’s a bloody good point though isn’t it.  I feel a career in law beckoning...

[Mr Gray]

That wasn't the question posed,did any of the cases involved have as a concern an ongoing criminal investigation.

The answers no.. So my question to you is, what relevance do you think that has

[Mr Gray]

You seem to think the SC tried the case. They didn't. They upheld the Appeal Court decision by rejecting Duarte's arguments against it.

The SC made a ruling... Read the court report... They balanced the rights of amaral and the rights if the mccanns... And came down in support if amaral... It's all there in the judgement... The balance between articles 10 and 8. .exactly what the ECHR deal with

[barrier]

The answers no.. So my question to you is, what relevance do you think that has

So there is unlikely to be a precedent set then to study.

[Mr Gray]

So there is unlikely to be a precedent set then to study.

So you think it's relevant.... Again why should it be... You can't seem to answer the question... I don't see, any relevance and you can't provide any... It's like saying have any involved the abductuin if blonde girls.... The precedents have been set fir the balance if 8 vs 10... And they are quite clear

[Venturi Swirl]

So there is unlikely to be a precedent set then to study.

Which part of “the on-going investigation has nothing to do with the judgement” do you not understand?

[G-Unit]

The SC made a ruling... Read the court report... They balanced the rights of amaral and the rights if the mccanns... And came down in support if amaral... It's all there in the judgement... The balance between articles 10 and 8. .exactly what the ECHR deal with

Which page is that on?

[Mr Gray]

Which page is that on?

It's in several pages... Have you really... Really.. Really.. read the judgement and not seen it...

how can you make any valued judgement on the validity of the  mccanns case when you do not seem to have read the SC judgement

[barrier]

So you think it's relevant.... Again why should it be... You can't seem to answer the question... I don't see, any relevance and you can't provide any... It's like saying have any involved the abductuin if blonde girls.... The precedents have been set fir the balance if 8 vs 10... And they are quite clear

I think there is every chance it could have a bearing,when and if the ECHR get around to it,they'll want all paper work from the very start,not cherry pick bits you would want them to.One of the central claims is that the book Amaral wrote harmed the search, did it? theres still a live criminal investigation some insist!

[barrier]

Which part of “the on-going investigation has nothing to do with the judgement” do you not understand?

Its like noahs ark,two by two.

[Venturi Swirl]

Its like noahs ark,two by two.

Are you a Young Earther?  That wouldn’t surprise me.

[Mr Gray]

I think there is every chance it could have a bearing,when and if the ECHR get around to it,they'll want all paper work from the very start,not cherry pick bits you would want them to.One of the central claims is that the book Amaral wrote harmed the search, did it? theres still a live criminal investigation some insist!

you have shown you dont understand...the harm to the  search will not feature...that is not a human right

[Venturi Swirl]

I think there is every chance it could have a bearing,when and if the ECHR get around to it,they'll want all paper work from the very start,not cherry pick bits you would want them to.One of the central claims is that the book Amaral wrote harmed the search, did it? theres still a live criminal investigation some insist!

G-Unit, please put your fellow whatever-you-want-to-call-it straight on this matter, ta.