McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[Robittybob1]

The claims made by the McCanns to the Portuguese courts are what the ECHR will look at.

It is certainly interesting question.  I just wish I had the brain power you two have to deal with it.  Keep going and sort it please.

[slartibartfast]

Could you provide a cite

https://context.reverso.net/translation/portuguese-english/eu+vou+provar-te

[Mr Gray]

https://context.reverso.net/translation/portuguese-english/eu+vou+provar-te

Depends what is meant by show.. Can you define what they mean by show..
Imo you are playing semantics.
If I'm asked to show that the square on the hypotenuse equals the sum of the squares on the other two sides.. Then show equals prove.

[Robittybob1]

Depends what is meant by show.. Can you define what they mean by show..
Imo you are playing semantics.
If I'm asked to show that the square on the hypotenuse equals the sum of the squares on the other two sides.. Then show equals prove.

Would it make a difference to the case if it was argued it meant "show" rather than "prove"?

[Mr Gray]

The claims made by the McCanns to the Portuguese courts are what the ECHR will look at.

I really don't think you understand the process at all... It reminds me of ..the only thing worse than lack of knowledge is the assumption of knowledge... Which imo describes your post to a tee.

Are you really not aware you are stating your opinion not fact

And I'm not sure what.. If anything... You are basing your opinion  on

[jassi]

It is certainly interesting question.  I just wish I had the brain power you two have to deal with it.  Keep going and sort it please.

Nothing will be resolved until the ECHR announce their decision.

[Mr Gray]

Would it make a difference to the case if it was argued it meant "show" rather than "prove"?

The word provar in this instance has been translated by at least two sceptics as prove.. And as I've pointed out... Show.. and demonstrate in this context also means prove

I really can hear the barrel being scraped

[Mr Gray]

Nothing will be resolved until the ECHR announce their decision.

I agree.. I'm just giving my opinion... It's gunit who seems to think she knows exactly what's going to be accepted

[Robittybob1]

I really don't think you understand the process at all... It reminds me of ..the only thing worse than lack of knowledge is the assumption of knowledge... Which imo describes your post to a tee.

Are you really not aware you are stating your opinion not fact

And I'm not sure what.. If anything... You are basing your opinion  on

And you are getting very annoyingly close to making ad hom arguments.

[Robittybob1]

The word provar in this instance has been translated by at least two sceptics as prove.. And as I've pointed out... Show.. and demonstrate in this context also means prove

I really can hear the barrel being scraped

You didn't answer my question.
I asked "Would it make a difference to the case if it was argued it meant "show" rather than "prove"?".

[jassi]

You didn't answer my question.
I asked "Would it make a difference to the case if it was argued it meant "show" rather than "prove"?".

Of course it wouldn't.
Its just argument for the sake of it - IMO

[Mr Gray]

And you are getting very annoyingly close to making ad hom arguments.

Gunit has, repeatedly stated, as opinion as fact... As Eleanor has pointed out

[Mr Gray]

You didn't answer my question.
I asked "Would it make a difference to the case if it was argued it meant "show" rather than "prove"?".

As long as you describe my posts, as, annoying I won't answer your question..

[Robittybob1]

As long as you describe my posts, as, annoying I won't answer your question..

Even more annoyance.

[Mr Gray]

Even more annoyance.

Could you address gunits continued statement of opinion as fact