McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[Mr Gray]

You can speculate until the cows come home, but it remains speculation, not fact.

Just like your claim that the McCanns thought that the archiving report proved them innocent. Despite many requests you failed to provide a cite so it's speculation

[G-Unit]

Just like your claim that the McCanns thought that the archiving report proved them innocent. Despite many requests you failed to provide a cite so it's speculation

I provided my cite with my original post.

[Venturi Swirl]

You can speculate until the cows come home, but it remains speculation, not fact.

I am not speculating, the facts are there for all to see. 

[Mr Gray]

I provided my cite with my original post.

You didn't.. You claimed.. A witness said.. That is not a cite as it can't be checked. It has no verification so its opinion
I'm fairly sure what you said is not true... Just speculation

[Venturi Swirl]

You can speculate until the cows come home, but it remains speculation, not fact.

why did you not give Wonderfulspam similar advice and a warning when he wrote "Amaral solved the case in 2007"?  Instead you "liked" his post.  Why?

[Eleanor]

Was money sequestered by anyone else? I’ve never heard that before.Then again I’m not that much interested in individual’s private income.....mainly because it’s private.

There were two Mortgages to Mortgage Companies on properties bought and or rolled over by Amaral and his wife.  And some other things that I can't specifically remember, possibly The Jaguar which appeared to have been repossessed, having been bought in the name of a company registered to Amaral which owned nothing else.

Amaral did apparently owe a lot of money at the time, going back to 2002, after a Court case with his brother which Amaral lost.  For an Inspector in The PJ this was not good.  So of course it was of interest.

[Eleanor]

You can speculate until the cows come home, but it remains speculation, not fact.

But remains a subject for discussion.

[Venturi Swirl]

There were two Mortgages to Mortgage Companies on properties bought and or rolled over by Amaral and his wife.  And some other things that I can't specifically remember, possibly The Jaguar which appeared to have been repossessed, having been bought in the name of a company registered to Amaral which owned nothing else.

Amaral did apparently owe a lot of money at the time, going back to 2002, after a Court case with his brother which Amaral lost.  For an Inspector in The PJ this was not good.  So of course it was of interest.

Quite.  An upholder of the law in such serious financial difficulties is something of a liability IMO. 

[Venturi Swirl]

But remains a subject for discussion.

If it's OK to say Summers and Swann cashed in on the case, then it's OK to say so too did Amaral.  Others have certainly accused the McCanns of cashing in on their daughter's disappearance on this forum without receiving warning points or having their posts removed. 

[Lace]

I am getting confused as to what we are allowed to say on this forum.    It's a debate but how can you debate properly when you have to watch every word you say.   It really is a turn off.

[Eleanor]

Quite.  An upholder of the law in such serious financial difficulties is something of a liability IMO.

Amaral wasn't in Financial Difficulties.  These Corporate Bodies ignored what he owed and so did he.

[Eleanor]

If it's OK to say Summers and Swann cashed in on the case, then it's OK to say so too did Amaral.  Others have certainly accused the McCanns of cashing in on their daughter's disappearance on this forum without receiving warning points or having their posts removed.

Sometimes it's what you don't say that matters.  Me I mean and not you.

[jassi]

I am getting confused as to what we are allowed to say on this forum.    It's a debate but how can you debate properly when you have to watch every word you say.   It really is a turn off.

Think before you speak.

[The General]

Quite.  An upholder of the law in such serious financial difficulties is something of a liability IMO.

Why would that be?

[G-Unit]

But remains a subject for discussion.

Provided posters remember not to post opinion as fact, which is against forum rules.