McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights

[Mr Gray]

Did Amaral offer an incomplete explanation of why he changed his lawyers?

LOL...LOL..LOL..Is this a red flag or perhaps an amber flag

[Venturi Swirl]

Did Amaral offer an incomplete explanation of why he changed his lawyers?

Kate didn't - it's all there in the quote I provided.

[Mr Gray]

Of these 19 components 15 are present within the result from this item
https://mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JOHN_LOWE.htm

thats from the report.....there never was any initial report that changed....its sceptic lies

[G-Unit]

Do you mean the report that concluded


“In my opinion, the laboratory results that were attained did not help to clarify whether or not the DNA results obtained within the scope of this case were from Madeleine McCann.”

In other words he didn't know if Madeleine's DNA was there or not.

[G-Unit]

Kate didn't - it's all there in the quote I provided.

So you are saying that Kate didn't write in her book on page 286 (kindle) that "we explained our concerns, which related mainly to Carlos's behaviour and attitude during the arguido interview period"? That explains why she changed lawyers to Rogerio Alves, but not why her husband didn't.

[Eleanor]

So you are saying that Kate didn't write in her book on page 286 (kindle) that "we explained our concerns, which related mainly to Carlos's behaviour and attitude during the arguido interview period"? That explains why she changed lawyers to Rogerio Alves, but not why her husband didn't.

What has this got to do with anything?

[Venturi Swirl]

In other words he didn't know if Madeleine's DNA was there or not.

So how did Amaral come to the conclusion that Madeleine had died in the apartment, her body deep frozen and put in the hire car 23 days later?

[Venturi Swirl]

So you are saying that Kate didn't write in her book on page 286 (kindle) that "we explained our concerns, which related mainly to Carlos's behaviour and attitude during the arguido interview period"? That explains why she changed lawyers to Rogerio Alves, but not why her husband didn't.

Did you not read the following passage that I quoted?

[Venturi Swirl]

What has this got to do with anything?

A very good question.

[G-Unit]

So how did Amaral come to the conclusion that Madeleine had died in the apartment, her body deep frozen and put in the hire car 23 days later?

He was hypothesising just as the McCanns hypothesised that an abductor took her.

[Venturi Swirl]

He was hypothesising just as the McCanns hypothesised that an abductor took her.

Let me take you back to your claim that

"My observations are, like Amaral's book, based on factual texts"

I repeat: what "factual texts" would have led Amaral to believe Madeleine died of a Calpol overdose, was hidden in a freezer and transported 23 days later?

He basically made the whole scenario up based on not one single "factual text". IMO.

[Brietta]

He was hypothesising just as the McCanns hypothesised that an abductor took her.

He continues hypothesising to the present day in numerous interviews stressing the innocence of convicted child molester and rapist Brueckner.

At least this time round he is incapable of damaging the active criminal investigation into a missing child as he did with the one he he had a say in as coordinator.

[Wonderfulspam]

He continues hypothesising to the present day in numerous interviews stressing the innocence of convicted child molester and rapist Brueckner.

At least this time round he is incapable of damaging the active criminal investigation into a missing child as he did with the one he he had a say in as coordinator.

It doesn't need much damaging, to be fair. I mean, not much happening is there, unless you choose to imagine Brueckner will be charged some day.

[G-Unit]

He continues hypothesising to the present day in numerous interviews stressing the innocence of convicted child molester and rapist Brueckner.

At least this time round he is incapable of damaging the active criminal investigation into a missing child as he did with the one he he had a say in as coordinator.

It's up to the Germans to prove their case, isn't it? When's the trial again? Imo the first investigation into Madeleine McCann's disappearance was damaged by many people, not just one person.

[Brietta]

It's up to the Germans to prove their case, isn't it? When's the trial again? Imo the first investigation into Madeleine McCann's disappearance was damaged by many people, not just one person.

Are you one of the promotors of the myth that amaral is an office boy?  Whatever - such an incompetent anywhere I have worked would have got his marching orders before he could do too much damage.

Oh - wait a minute - he DID get his marching orders! didn't he.

Isn't that why he claimed he had to write a lying book in his defence.

His replacement as office boy did a far better job though.  He did his best to curtail the leaks to the Correio da Manhã et al.  Brought in experts and concluded that the three arguidos had no case to answer