....of the McCann debate.
Is this the case or is it another anti myth?
Interesting that this section is still about the ABDUCTION of Madeleine- normally anathema to the [ censored word]!
Trouble is, on that one, that the abduction is merely that, an unproven myth, without a shred of credible evidence to back it up. However, the Mccanns have displayed it as a fact, which is a blatant lie.
I do wish people would use English correctly. Anyone is true to state their own beliefs. If they believe Madeleine was abducted,they have the right to say that. They may be right or wrong but they have a right to express their beliefs. Facts may later prove them wrong,but that would not make it a LIE, merely a mistake!
In order to prove that the McCanns "LIED" you would have to prove that they purposefully told an untruth with the intention to deceive. You have not done so. All you can claim is that you believe them to be lying- a very different matter.
Neither you nor anyone else has shown that the McCanns have LIED about anything.They may have been mistaken, but that is not sufficient to claim a lie has been spoken.