I'm sorry Angelo but simply saying there is no evidence of abduction doesn't make a theory of abduction implausible or illogical. You would need a positive reason (ie not an absence of evidence, but evidence of something else that could help rule it out) to demonstrate that abduction was neither plausible nor logical. Your theory relies on the McCanns staging an abduction (opening the window) as well as there being an actual abduction which is IMO highly implausible.
Woke and wandered plus ..., does
not depend on scene staging by the McCanns. I have done Madeleine by height and Madeleine by weight on my blog and she was perfectly capable of opening the window, raising the shutter and exiting 5A.
She had the capability.
That does not mean this is what happened.
It means woke and wandered, fitting all known evidence, does
not require shenanigans on the part of Kate, or Gerry, or anyone in the Tapas 9.