What was the highly significant piece of evidence that was handed in???
Chief among them is a 'highly significant' piece of new evidence that has been handed to them and which is undergoing a series of forensic tests.
Now people just assume it's the Pizza because of this next quote
In keeping with the investigation so far, the police have not revealed details of what the item is, but it is understood that it is not the sock that was missing from her body when it was discovered on Christmas Day.
Now I wouldn't think it's the Pizza or Box... That's long gone.... So what could it be???
And more to the point who handed it in???
You have to think of what information was divulged to the media.... What the public knew about the case.... And as everything else is accounted for I believe... So what on earth could it be ??
Bernard... maybe it was something to do with The Cat.... Did it loose it's collar... Was it's collar taken??? That Cat has to be mentioned for a reason.... (IMO)... Not only do we have images of said cat... we have Rebecca Scott talking about it in her video with the Police....
So what is it about ""Bernard"....
Well I have discovered that it is neutered... And I deduced this from the cat food which is on the Floor next to the shelves where we can see the Intercom...
And I have also discovered what type of Catfood is there.... "Royal Canin Vet Care Nutrition Cat - Neutered Young Male"... A very specific type of Cat Food.... Don't know if it was put there for a reason or not!
Anyway... Back to Bernard we know from the photograph of Joanna Yeates holding a rather large Bernard that he wore a collar... The name receptacle and bell are visible.... Was it the collar handed in???
I don't know.... I have tried to rack my brains as to what it could be.... And where it came from..... Was it something to do with the "Sobbing Girl"???
I try to look at this logically.... And question myself.....
How can something be handed in that is significant, when nothing that we don't already now has been revealed...???
This I believe is why they jumped to the idea that it was the Pizza.... And I don't believe that it was.....
So the person who handed something in has to be known to Joanna Yeates.... Or connected to the Investigation somehow... I cannot think of another option.....
Is it something that came directly from the house ??? The only thing I can see Missing from the House is the Plant that should have been on the plate in the front room.... Is that what it is ???
The article then goes on to talk about pollen samples....
Soil and pollen tests are also expected to be carried out on the item and a police source said: 'This, along with the DNA analysis, is being treated extremely seriously as a credible piece of evidence.'
But if it isn't the plant ... Was the item buried???
Is this why we don't here about the Significant piece of evidence at trial... Because only someone close to the Investigation would know that it was Significant.....
Again casting doubt on Dr Vincent Tabak's conviction..... (IMO)...
The paragraph about Pollen Samples..... Now if it isn't the plant from the table... How would testing for pollen samples help????
What value on testing would that bring??? You would need to know the location of said Item... It would have to be directly linked to Joanna Yeates.... For it to yield any evidentiary value. The pollen tests would only give the location of where said item may have come from..... Was the same pollen found on Joanna Yeates ...????
I don't think this item was on Longwood Lane.... So were could it have been found????
My next option is that it was a bunch of flowers... Did someone find a bunch of flowers with Joanna Yeates name on ???
And the Police were letting someone know if they found them they could test their clothes for pollen????
Is that why we see so many images of flowers with her name????
If it isn't someone close to the Investigation who hands this significant piece of evidence in... And it was a member of the public... The only option I can think of is that it had to be something with 'Jo's" name on it....!!
And a bunch of flowers is the only thing I can imaging..... Where these flowers Yellow??
There is no pollen found on Dr Vincent Tabak.... And you would have imagined that to be the case if this significant piece of evidence was linked to him!!
In fact where did he put his coat when he took it off???
Should that have yielded some evidence linking him to Longwood lane ???
I am totally perplexed as to what this significant piece of evidence could be..... But for now I will stick with the idea that it was a bunch of flowers.... maybe daffodils.... (You can have them at Xmas if force grown)..
We have to remember we are constantly shown images of flowers.... There's an image of what is supposed to be Dr Vincent Tabak's window... That too has a bunch of daffodils in the window sill.... Maybe it's Roses..??
I will say that i believe that it is the significant piece of evidence that was handed in.. that should help to prove that Dr Vincent Tabak didn't commit this crime....
Because there is never any mention of Joanna Yeates having Dr Vincent Tabak as an admirer.... Is there ??
The only way that you could say that The Significant piece of evidence is linked to Dr Vincent Tabak, is that he actually knew Joanna Yeates.... And he came round with a bunch of flowers.... Changing everything about the case...(IMO)..
But if that had been the case.... why not just use it as evidence in court....
Did the Sobbing Girl know something about the flowers??? I don't know... Anything seems possible in this case.... (IMO)...
Another thing I have just thought of... If there was a label on said possible bunch of flowers... Was it a sticky note??
DCI Phil Jones... seeing as Dr Vincent Tabak is serving a life sentence... Could you now please tell us what the
Significant piece of Evidence was??? Thank you!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1345938/Joanna-Yeates-murder-The-final-text-friend-replied-late.html#ixzz4rPm0XuYB Edit.... Just thinking about it now... I'll go as far as to say that it was a bunch of flowers with a card and her name on it.....
The article was dated the 11th January 2011... Now some of you will remember the article about the Pizza and note that was in the papers I believe on the 10th January 2010.... And within some of the articles the Police said that they had the persons
"Handwriting"....Now... Is it the card or post it note with Joanna Yeates name on it that could have come with a bunch of flowers, from said admirer ??????
Why else would the Police says that they had the
"Persons Handwriting"???? If they didn't know who killed her ????
It's a possibility!!
Double Edit....The letter, written on a page from a notepad, included a pizza label but not that of the Tesco pizza purchased by Miss Yeates. Bristol Ram landlord Alex Major said: "I can confirm we received a letter via the post on Monday 27, the first Monday after Christmas. There was a pizza label inside, but it wasn't a Tesco label."
So is the
note a Sticky Note ??
Read more at:
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/pizza-label-prank-in-yeates-case-1-3030995[attachment deleted by admin]
