Author Topic: The Defence Will State Their Case  (Read 599692 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2325 on: October 17, 2018, 03:50:53 PM »
Can I just ask if Tabak was a busy little bee minding his own business that night and all that he claimed to be true is a lie, how did he manage to search about her murder before she was reported missing?
« Last Edit: October 17, 2018, 04:57:45 PM by jixy »

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2326 on: October 17, 2018, 04:21:13 PM »
Going back to the program and why I believe that CJ should have been at the trial was because he says this on the program:

At  27:41 0f the program CJ says: finishing at 28:12 of video
So... I have CJ seeing 2/3 people at the gate, we have CJ talking on video stating he actually had spoken to Dr Vincent Tabak that evening, and we have CJ missing from said trial.... why??

So from the conversation we can assume a couple of things based on what we know.....

CJ is leaving for the gym.... So CJ must have left for the gym around 7:00 pm as we know from reports that Dr Vincent Tabak arrived home around 7:00 7:15pm that evening... Based on text messages he sent Tanja telling her he had arrived home...

CJ arrives back from the gym at 9:00pm, he believes the day is Friday 17th December, he tells us in his Leveson Inquiry statement....

There is a light dusting of snow, we see no snow fall on the CCTV of Joanna Yeates walking up Park Street, so what day is CJ referring too??

The interview on the program with CJ, is after Dr Vincent Tabak has dispose of her body, So is CJ talking about Friday 17th December 2010 or Saturday 18th December 2010 when we knew it had been snowing??

DCI Phil Jones: 28:30 of video...

Two people we know are key people in this case... DCI Phil Jones the SOI of the Investigation, telling us at what time the snow started to fall and CJ, telling us that there was a light dusting of snow...

Is 8:00 O'clock am or pm?? that fact is important... If it is pm, then that makes the day that CJ saw Dr Vincnt tabak Saturday 18th December 2010 and that also being the day he went to the gym, unless he went to the gym every day possibily

Making the fact that CJ is missing from trial even more important... Tanja too... she would be able to verify when Dr Vincent Tabak left the flat to view the light dusting of snow..

Before Dr Vincent Tabak's arrest, everything was pointing to the 18th December 2010 being the important date, but once we had Dr Vincent Tabak arrested and said trial take place... Friday 17th December then became the date of the crime....

Going back to DCI Phil Jones statement... It didn't start to snow until 2:30am on Saturday 18th December 2010, in fact lets be clear here, no-one actually states the date... They say a day, but not the date.... weird!!

So if we have no snow anywhere until 2:30am on Saturday 18th December 2010, then how did no-one see a body lying on a grass verge on Longwood Lane when the Lane was being frequented by people attending functions etc, on the Friday 17th December 2010 night!!

There is a body dumped in plain sight and not one person sees this body, it has to be lying there for approximately 3 hours before the snow even starts, it has to be lying in plain sight, for everyone to see, a bright pink flower patterned top would be clearly visible, a body of a person too, yet not one person who has gone up or down this busy lane has seen a woman, who could be in difficulty lying on a grass verge in full view....

That is a massive issue... I cannot believe that Joanna Yeates had lain on a grass verge completely exposed for at least 3 hours and not one person noticed a body on said grass verge....

At trial we should have witness's... we should have had CJ there..(imo), he can put Dr Vincent Tabak on Canygne Road at a particular time, which is vital when establishing a timeline... A vital witness , the only witness that we know of, who has seen Dr Vincent Tabak on Canygne Road.... And if we are to go with CJ's Leveson Inquiry, we must believe it was Friday, and it would also have to be Friday, if we go with the tale told on the stand, by Dr Vincent Tabak, himself.....

So a known witness, who is telling us after the event that he actually spoke to Dr Vincent Tabak that evening.... A crucial witness (imo)...

We know from his Leveson statement CJ arrived back at 9:00pm ish.... So CJ is at the gym for 2 hours ish..... The times that CJ lets us believe are correct are they?? They are important...

If CJ is arriving home earlier than he knows, then the people at the gate could have been arriving at Joanna yeates flat rather than leaving, she could have had been expecting people to visit her.... It is feasible...

Zoe Lehman doesn't say she sees CJ, she hears a scream, CJ hears nothing of the sort and we have a timeline we are confused by....

So what time does CJ see Dr Vincent Tabak?? And whereabouts exactly did he see him... ?? And more importantly what day did he see Dr Vincent Tabak??


Quite by chance??  Why would that be the case?? If Dr Vincent Tabak had a work routine and arrived home at roughly the same time on an evening, then the time would always be the same, If CJ had a routine of going to the Gym on a night at a certain time every night, the probability of bumping into each other, cuts the chances of this event happening dramatically,

So do we call it chance?? I don't know...

CJ has twice given information that in central to this case.... The information that he spoke to Dr Vincent Tabak, was that in the second witness statement?? Or in the first?? We don't know, but it literally could have been either....

But CJ, has clearly stated he has spoken with Dr Vincent Tabak, and there is NO mistake about that....

CJ.... Is therefore a witness... even if you want to tell me the people he may have seen or heard at the gate were irrelevant, because of what Dr Vincent Tabak stated on the stand...

CJ witnessed more than most, he can put the defendant on Canygne Road at a particular time and it should be on a particular day... That has to be the 17th December 2010... if we are to believe the trial....

If Greg's a witness... CJ is the ultimate witness, a person who knows and has seen the defendant, has described defendants mood, and the weather conditions of that time....

So yes he should have been at trial, there is no doubt in my mind, and I do not understand why the prosecution or the defence did not call CJ to the stand, a live witness who can give an accurate timeline of events, a live witness who can give us information about the defendant that no-one else knows, a live witness that can put Dr Vincent Tabak on Canygne Road!!!

A live witness who has committed himself to video, explaining the events of that time..... That live witnness being CJ..

Was that a Freudian slip Nine?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline justsaying

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2327 on: October 17, 2018, 04:26:02 PM »
DNA evidence
Fibre evidence
Internet Searches
Confession
Victims blood in his boot

The body was covered - not exposed...

https://stories.swns.com/news/jo-yeates-strangled-by-cold-and-calculated-vincent-tabak-21328/

Please tell me how again how is he innocent?


« Last Edit: October 17, 2018, 04:28:16 PM by justsaying »

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2328 on: October 17, 2018, 04:28:57 PM »
Going back to the program and why I believe that CJ should have been at the trial was because he says this on the program:

At  27:41 0f the program CJ says: finishing at 28:12 of video
So... I have CJ seeing 2/3 people at the gate, we have CJ talking on video stating he actually had spoken to Dr Vincent Tabak that evening, and we have CJ missing from said trial.... why??

So from the conversation we can assume a couple of things based on what we know.....

CJ is leaving for the gym.... So CJ must have left for the gym around 7:00 pm as we know from reports that Dr Vincent Tabak arrived home around 7:00 7:15pm that evening... Based on text messages he sent Tanja telling her he had arrived home...

CJ arrives back from the gym at 9:00pm, he believes the day is Friday 17th December, he tells us in his Leveson Inquiry statement....

There is a light dusting of snow, we see no snow fall on the CCTV of Joanna Yeates walking up Park Street, so what day is CJ referring too??

The interview on the program with CJ, is after Dr Vincent Tabak has dispose of her body, So is CJ talking about Friday 17th December 2010 or Saturday 18th December 2010 when we knew it had been snowing??

DCI Phil Jones: 28:30 of video...

Two people we know are key people in this case... DCI Phil Jones the SOI of the Investigation, telling us at what time the snow started to fall and CJ, telling us that there was a light dusting of snow...

Is 8:00 O'clock am or pm?? that fact is important... If it is pm, then that makes the day that CJ saw Dr Vincnt tabak Saturday 18th December 2010 and that also being the day he went to the gym, unless he went to the gym every day possibily

Making the fact that CJ is missing from trial even more important... Tanja too... she would be able to verify when Dr Vincent Tabak left the flat to view the light dusting of snow..

Before Dr Vincent Tabak's arrest, everything was pointing to the 18th December 2010 being the important date, but once we had Dr Vincent Tabak arrested and said trial take place... Friday 17th December then became the date of the crime....

Going back to DCI Phil Jones statement... It didn't start to snow until 2:30am on Saturday 18th December 2010, in fact lets be clear here, no-one actually states the date... They say a day, but not the date.... weird!!

So if we have no snow anywhere until 2:30am on Saturday 18th December 2010, then how did no-one see a body lying on a grass verge on Longwood Lane when the Lane was being frequented by people attending functions etc, on the Friday 17th December 2010 night!!

There is a body dumped in plain sight and not one person sees this body, it has to be lying there for approximately 3 hours before the snow even starts, it has to be lying in plain sight, for everyone to see, a bright pink flower patterned top would be clearly visible, a body of a person too, yet not one person who has gone up or down this busy lane has seen a woman, who could be in difficulty lying on a grass verge in full view....

That is a massive issue... I cannot believe that Joanna Yeates had lain on a grass verge completely exposed for at least 3 hours and not one person noticed a body on said grass verge....

At trial we should have witness's... we should have had CJ there..(imo), he can put Dr Vincent Tabak on Canygne Road at a particular time, which is vital when establishing a timeline... A vital witness , the only witness that we know of, who has seen Dr Vincent Tabak on Canygne Road.... And if we are to go with CJ's Leveson Inquiry, we must believe it was Friday, and it would also have to be Friday, if we go with the tale told on the stand, by Dr Vincent Tabak, himself.....

So a known witness, who is telling us after the event that he actually spoke to Dr Vincent Tabak that evening.... A crucial witness (imo)...

We know from his Leveson statement CJ arrived back at 9:00pm ish.... So CJ is at the gym for 2 hours ish..... The times that CJ lets us believe are correct are they?? They are important...

If CJ is arriving home earlier than he knows, then the people at the gate could have been arriving at Joanna yeates flat rather than leaving, she could have had been expecting people to visit her.... It is feasible...

Zoe Lehman doesn't say she sees CJ, she hears a scream, CJ hears nothing of the sort and we have a timeline we are confused by....

So what time does CJ see Dr Vincent Tabak?? And whereabouts exactly did he see him... ?? And more importantly what day did he see Dr Vincent Tabak??


Quite by chance??  Why would that be the case?? If Dr Vincent Tabak had a work routine and arrived home at roughly the same time on an evening, then the time would always be the same, If CJ had a routine of going to the Gym on a night at a certain time every night, the probability of bumping into each other, cuts the chances of this event happening dramatically,

So do we call it chance?? I don't know...

CJ has twice given information that in central to this case.... The information that he spoke to Dr Vincent Tabak, was that in the second witness statement?? Or in the first?? We don't know, but it literally could have been either....

But CJ, has clearly stated he has spoken with Dr Vincent Tabak, and there is NO mistake about that....

CJ.... Is therefore a witness... even if you want to tell me the people he may have seen or heard at the gate were irrelevant, because of what Dr Vincent Tabak stated on the stand...

CJ witnessed more than most, he can put the defendant on Canygne Road at a particular time and it should be on a particular day... That has to be the 17th December 2010... if we are to believe the trial....

If Greg's a witness... CJ is the ultimate witness, a person who knows and has seen the defendant, has described defendants mood, and the weather conditions of that time....

So yes he should have been at trial, there is no doubt in my mind, and I do not understand why the prosecution or the defence did not call CJ to the stand, a live witness who can give an accurate timeline of events, a live witness who can give us information about the defendant that no-one else knows, a live witness that can put Dr Vincent Tabak on Canygne Road!!!

A live witness who has committed himself to video, explaining the events of that time..... That live witnness being CJ..

Didn't Tabak say he'd covered her body in leaves!
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2329 on: October 17, 2018, 04:30:18 PM »
DNA evidence
Fibre evidence
Internet Searches
Confession
Victims blood in his boot

The body was covered - not exposed...

https://stories.swns.com/news/jo-yeates-strangled-by-cold-and-calculated-vincent-tabak-21328/

Please tell me how again how is he innocent?

 8((()*/

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2330 on: October 17, 2018, 04:40:08 PM »
In other words Nine the reason certain witnesses weren't required was because Tabak's trial was to establish his intent. He'd already admitted to killing JY.

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2331 on: October 17, 2018, 04:59:30 PM »
 8@??)(

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2332 on: October 17, 2018, 04:59:46 PM »
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=8060.msg496375#msg496375


That post, that post that CJ is telling us important information, is massive....

Even if we want to argue the day, even if we want to say that Dr Vincent Tabak lied on the stand and the event was Saturday 18th December 2010......

CJ may be mistaken on the day also, But.... What you cannot take away from CJ's statement is he had a conversation with Dr Vincent Tabak.... The time of this conversation is vital.... And for more than one reason...

I for arguments sake assumed that it had to be when Dr Vincent Tabak arrived home from work, making CJ being at the gym a 2 hour experience.... But that isn't likely....

At trail I believe that Dr Vincent Tabak went outside to take pictures of the snow.... dirty snow apparently and didn't end up taking pictures....

Quote
He had left his flat to see if he could take pictures of the snow, the court heard, but did not do so because the snow "was dirty".

So we have CJ, confirming that there is snow on the ground...
We have Dr Vincent Tabak talking of dirty snow.... and we have a time of around 8:00 o'clock when snowfall stopped....

So maybe CJ, left for the gym nearer 8:00pm rather than 7:00pm..... And that is crucial...

We know from the Leveson he returned around 9:00pm, so Did CJ see Dr Vincent Tabak when Dr Vincent Tabak either returned or set of to take images of the snow??

CJ doesn't tell us in which direction Dr Vincent Tabak is going... arriving or leaving... important pieces of information....

The reason I am being a stickler about said times is I believe they are vital..... The would give us a more accurate time line, but there's something I hadn't thought of before......

What was Dr Vincent Tabak wearing???

CJ, is witness to the clothing that Dr Vincent Tabak was wearing that evening.... He can see his trousers,shoes, coat, and maybe the shirt underneath.... Did Dr Vincent Tabak have his coat on.... Did Dr Vincent Tabak have his coat opened.... Did he wear gloves or a hat.... what was Dr Vincent Tabak's attire like that evening when CJ had a conversation with him???

These are most important details.... Because if we are to believe that a violent struggle happened and Joanna yeates received 43 injuries in this fight for her life, then what Dr Vincent Tabak was wearing, is crucial,...

By the time we see any images of Dr Vincent Tabak on the 17th December 2010 at Asda supermarket in Bedminster, we can clealy see what colour trousers, he is wearing, we can see his shoes, we can see his black coat and we can see his red shirt.....

Now..... This is after said attack on Joanna Yeates.....  CJ's vital witness testimony was needed at trial.... he could tell us what Dr Vincent Tabak had worn that evening, we could then see for ourselves whether or not Dr Vincent Tabak had changed his clothing before he went to Asda, getting rid of any evidence on said clothing.... A live witness who could tell us what he said to Dr Vincent Tabak and what Dr Vincent Tabak said to him.... A live witness who should be able to describe what items of  clothing he saw the defendant wearing that evening....

But he is not a witness at trial apparently.... He has not divulged whether or not Dr Vincent Tabak changed his clothes to hide his crime.... There is no evidence on the clothing we can see of Dr Vincent Tabak at ASDA... so where is all this blood?? From this violent attack, he must have got some on himself... he can't avoid gravity....

So why wasn't CJ at trial.... Why wasn't more made of what Dr Vincent Tabak was wearing that evening??  Because Dr Vincent Tabak had apparently spent an hour in his flat before going to ASDA, a time when he could have showered and changed his clothing....

We have a witness whom has not only seen Dr Vincent Tabak on Canygne Road , but has conversed with Dr Vincent Tabak on Canygne Road, a witness ho knows the defendant, a witness, who is the defendants landlord.....

So what can CJ tell us of what he saw, that evening, he may have been vague about what he apparently heard or saw on his return from the gym, but he obviously remembers the conversation he had with Dr Vincent Tabak....

here is something else to ponder, If CJ is vague and unsure about what he heard or saw at the gate and Colin Port tells us CJ had seen people at the gate, and that CJ, must be mistaken, then does that not make questioning when CJ saw Dr Vincent Tabak...

Could that not have been when he RETURNED from the GYM instead of leaving?? He has made genuine errors as has been shown in The Leveson Report, so is CJ mistaken and he saw Dr vincent Tabak on Canygne Road on his return from the gym....

CJ doesn't mention in his Leveson statement that he has seen anyone on Canygne Road, he doesn't mention that he saw Dr Vincent Tabak....

Bringing me to the conclusion that the people that CJ possibly saw at the gate, being Dr Vincent Tabak and Tanja Morson,... Joanna Yeates may or may not have been with them... I am not saying she was...

But CJ.. has furnished us with 2 pieces of evidence...  He tells us at the Leveson he thinks it was Friday.... But by saying thinks it was he is not committing himself to a said day.....

But using the information from the program and DCI Phil Jones, using the information from trial and using CJ's statements from programs and the Leveson... I think I have a clearer picture...

CJ... must be talking of Saturday 18th December 2010... I realistically cannot see it being any other day.... Evidence we have is the snow..... The snow is dirty... meaning people have trodden about said snow....

CJ clearly indicate that he by chance has come across Dr Vincent Tabak, whom is talking about how beautiful things are with the snow...   CJ, is telling us he is going to the gym.... But is he.... If he witness, people at the gate, and these people have been kept secret, there needs to be a reason for these peoples identity to be kept secret....

As I have stated, they should have been witness's if not suspects....

So I conclude the people at the gate are Dr Vincent Tabak and Tanja Morson, and that is the reason we do not know of there identity....

Because CJ is saying that at the time they believe Joanna Yeates was Murdered, Dr Vnicent Tabak is on Canygne Road with another witness putting him there.....

The people at the gate.... one of them has to be Dr Vincent Tabak... It's the same event.... CJ doesn't speak of a seperate event...

CJ speaking again at: 28:48 of the video....
Quote
Vincent Tabak helped me move the car that morning, erm, becawse, there was snow on the drive, and I need some help, in the car being pushed up.. erm, the slight incline, from the parking area onto the main part of the drive,, so that I could get the car out

bare that in mind... That statement on video of CJ's..

Leveson
Quote
l. This was that one evening, which
might have been Friday 17 December 2010, as  I was coming back from the gym at
about 9pm, I had parked my car on the road and was just walking through the gates of
the main driveway, when I became aware of what sounded like two or perhaps three
people leaving by the side gate on the other side of the house which I could not see as
there is a hedge hi between and it was dark, I duly telephoned the police and relayed
this.

Ok... So when did CJ move his car onto the drive?? Dr Vincent Tabak stating that CJ's car had changed position doesn't therefore sound too far fetched.......

But lets not point fingers..... Because we need the events to be correct.....

If CJ, tells us he has seen 2/3 people at the gate.... he has spoken to Dr Vincent Tabak, Dr Vincent Tabak is talking about snow, doesn't this add to the likely hood that CJ is talking about the day being Saturday,??.... but that the people he saw, and not only saw but obviously spoke to is Dr Vincent Tabak and who ever accompanied him....

You either have to say that CJ is lying to the Leveson that he parked his car on the road after the gym, and Dr Vincent Tabak witnessed and noticed said car had changed position..... Or, CJ did indeed get his days mixed up and his car of course, was on the drive of the morning of Saturday 18th December 2010 and on the evening of Saturday 18th 2010, is when he parked his car on the road after he had been to the gym, because , he had had difficulty that morning moving his car off the drive.... making complete sense as to why car is on road, and CJ saying he left it there quite true....

You then have to ask what relevance the ASDA video has?? It has NO time stamp upon it but the date of the 17th December 2010 is there for all to see....

* Saturday morning 18th December Dr Vincent Tabak helps CJ move his car from snowy parking space onto main
   part of the drive at Canygne Road.....

* When leaving for the gym CJ comes across Dr Vincent Tabak ( this has to be Saturday 18th December 2010)

* When returning from the gym at 9:00pm CJ parks his car on the road.....( obviously, he has already told us the
   state of the drive,... so again this has to be Saturday 18th December 2010... he tells us at the Leveson it might
   have been Friday, he doesn't say it was Friday!)

* He notices people at the gate, whether he heard or saw depends on what you want to believe, but.. that has to be
   Saturday 18th December 2010 also.....only follows)

* He converses with Dr Vincent Tabak as he has demonstrated..... in said program....  That too has to be Saturday
  18th December 2010...

* The only problem now is the time... if CJ is not sure of the day..... did he Dr Vincent Tabak when he returned from
   the gym, putting Dr Vincent Tabak on Canygne road in the snow at 9:00pm on Saturday 18th December 2010..
   taking photo's, meaning it is a extremely great possibility that CJ, saw Dr Vincent Tabak at the small gate, him
   then being one of the 2/3 people whom CJ: saw/heard!!!

So who was Dr Vincent Tabak with??  that is the important piece of information..... We have Kingdon telling us he heard a scream/ cry out of someone saying "help me" mid morning on Saturday 18th December 2010, he lived in the houses directly behind Joanna yeates bedroom window....

If we go with what I am proposing, then, Saturday 18th December 2010 has to be the day, there is no two ways about it.... But what of Dr Vincent Tabak...??

Is this where I question his guilt?? is this where I wonder what is true... Is this where I question how he is actually responsible....

If Dr Vincent Tabak on his own killed Joanna Yeates, one would say the story on the stand sort of explains it... But thats not good enough.... Has he been charged under Joint Enterprise??? That has to be the most likely way he was charged, because he has other people with him at a vital time... Meaning he must have had assistance in moving a body that he alone could not carry....

So who else did CJ witness at the gate??

Did Dr Vincent Tabak just assist someone, making him just as guilty and culpable under this law?? Did he knowingly assist??

Or is he completely Innocent of all charges levelled against him, as I have always contended based on what I have know of the case???

If the body is place on Longwood Lane at sometime on Saturday 18th December 2010, then that is a more likely prospect seeing as said snow is already there to cover said body up..... making her less visible... Then the image of Dr Vincent Tabak in his car on park Street on the 18th December 2010 would make sense, as they say he was driving around looking for a place to dispose of a body....

Is Dr Vincent Tabak involved up and to the point of getting rid of said body.... Does he really know who killed Joanna Yeates and has become enbroiled in this saga for some unknown reason.... Or as I have stated all along completely Innocent of this crime....

Who is lying about this case.... Well we know for a fact that Dr Vincent Tabak is lying which ever way you want to look at it.... The reason he is lying is unclear.....

But if CJ, is wholly Innocent as has been stated, and CJ is telling us information that he saw Dr Vincent Tabak on the evening Joanna Yeates ha been killed, do we now believe that Joanna Yeates was either killed on the 17th December 2010 or killed on the 18th December 2010?? With Kingdon's statement to maybe support that someone was having difficulty  mid morning n Saturday 18th December 2010??

They have never had an exact time and day of death of Joanna Yeates.... they go from the story on the stand told by Dr Vincent Tabak.....

but if we know take into account CJ's statement... Was Joanna Yeates killed on Saturday 18th December 2010??

It seems more likely, she could even have been removed from her home, on Saturday 18th December 2010 mid morning... making her flat not the scene of Crime... Lets not forget her parents believed she had been abducted.... And it is only Kingdons statement that gives us an indication she may have been abducted....

Therefore, she may have arrived home on Friday 17th December 2010...  she may have left her own belongings in the flat,.. but someone else closed the door... someone else, removed her from her flat and it's possible she was alive when she left said flat....

So what is the truth of The Murder of Joanna Yeates ??? And who was really involved with her death???

But one last thing... CJ says:
Quote
Joanna Yeates’ murder and my arrest
6. As I have said, Ms Yeates went missing on Friday 17
December 2010. She was reported to the Police as
missing on Sunday 19 December 2010.

Now is he telling us that she went Missing on Friday 17th December 2010 as a fact....  or is he just stating what is now apparently known about, when she went Missing because of the trial.... ??

Don't let that date confuse you... Everything that is stated appears to point to the 18th December 2010 being the day that Joanna Yeates was last known to be alive.... CJ on his leveson statement could just be quoting from what is now know... But I cannot say that for sure....

the only way in which we can conclusively prove what day it was , is the CCTV of either CJ going to the Gym ...coming back from the gym, or at the gym... either way there must be footage of this....

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-15257562f

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2333 on: October 17, 2018, 05:04:49 PM »
Its a pity you dont pick Tabak apart like you do CJ . What CJ does or doesnt do is irrelevant to the process

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2334 on: October 17, 2018, 05:06:39 PM »
In other words Nine the reason certain witnesses weren't required was because Tabak's trial was to establish his intent. He'd already admitted to killing JY.

Lets establish when said event actually happened and have said relevant witness making statements and appearing at trial....

Making Zoe and Florians witness statements irrelevant , if the day Joanna Yeates was disposed of was after Saturday 18th December 2010, after CJ had spoken to Dr Vincent Tabak.....

Making the screams party goers.....


Offline Nicholas

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2335 on: October 17, 2018, 05:06:43 PM »
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=8060.msg496375#msg496375


That post, that post that CJ is telling us important information, is massive....

Even if we want to argue the day, even if we want to say that Dr Vincent Tabak lied on the stand and the event was Saturday 18th December 2010......

CJ may be mistaken on the day also, But.... What you cannot take away from CJ's statement is he had a conversation with Dr Vincent Tabak.... The time of this conversation is vital.... And for more than one reason...

I for arguments sake assumed that it had to be when Dr Vincent Tabak arrived home from work, making CJ being at the gym a 2 hour experience.... But that isn't likely....

At trail I believe that Dr Vincent Tabak went outside to take pictures of the snow.... dirty snow apparently and didn't end up taking pictures....

So we have CJ, confirming that there is snow on the ground...
We have Dr Vincent Tabak talking of dirty snow.... and we have a time of around 8:00 o'clock when snowfall stopped....

So maybe CJ, left for the gym nearer 8:00pm rather than 7:00pm..... And that is crucial...

We know from the Leveson he returned around 9:00pm, so Did CJ see Dr Vincent Tabak when Dr Vincent Tabak either returned or set of to take images of the snow??

CJ doesn't tell us in which direction Dr Vincent Tabak is going... arriving or leaving... important pieces of information....

The reason I am being a stickler about said times is I believe they are vital..... The would give us a more accurate time line, but there's something I hadn't thought of before......

What was Dr Vincent Tabak wearing???

CJ, is witness to the clothing that Dr Vincent Tabak was wearing that evening.... He can see his trousers,shoes, coat, and maybe the shirt underneath.... Did Dr Vincent Tabak have his coat on.... Did Dr Vincent Tabak have his coat opened.... Did he wear gloves or a hat.... what was Dr Vincent Tabak's attire like that evening when CJ had a conversation with him???

These are most important details.... Because if we are to believe that a violent struggle happened and Joanna yeates received 43 injuries in this fight for her life, then what Dr Vincent Tabak was wearing, is crucial,...

By the time we see any images of Dr Vincent Tabak on the 17th December 2010 at Asda supermarket in Bedminster, we can clealy see what colour trousers, he is wearing, we can see his shoes, we can see his black coat and we can see his red shirt.....

Now..... This is after said attack on Joanna Yeates.....  CJ's vital witness testimony was needed at trial.... he could tell us what Dr Vincent Tabak had worn that evening, we could then see for ourselves whether or not Dr Vincent Tabak had changed his clothing before he went to Asda, getting rid of any evidence on said clothing.... A live witness who could tell us what he said to Dr Vincent Tabak and what Dr Vincent Tabak said to him.... A live witness who should be able to describe what items of  clothing he saw the defendant wearing that evening....

But he is not a witness at trial apparently.... He has not divulged whether or not Dr Vincent Tabak changed his clothes to hide his crime.... There is no evidence on the clothing we can see of Dr Vincent Tabak at ASDA... so where is all this blood?? From this violent attack, he must have got some on himself... he can't avoid gravity....

So why wasn't CJ at trial.... Why wasn't more made of what Dr Vincent Tabak was wearing that evening??  Because Dr Vincent Tabak had apparently spent an hour in his flat before going to ASDA, a time when he could have showered and changed his clothing....

We have a witness whom has not only seen Dr Vincent Tabak on Canygne Road , but has conversed with Dr Vincent Tabak on Canygne Road, a witness ho knows the defendant, a witness, who is the defendants landlord.....

So what can CJ tell us of what he saw, that evening, he may have been vague about what he apparently heard or saw on his return from the gym, but he obviously remembers the conversation he had with Dr Vincent Tabak....

here is something else to ponder, If CJ is vague and unsure about what he heard or saw at the gate and Colin Port tells us CJ had seen people at the gate, and that CJ, must be mistaken, then does that not make questioning when CJ saw Dr Vincent Tabak...

Could that not have been when he RETURNED from the GYM instead of leaving?? He has made genuine errors as has been shown in The Leveson Report, so is CJ mistaken and he saw Dr vincent Tabak on Canygne Road on his return from the gym....

CJ doesn't mention in his Leveson statement that he has seen anyone on Canygne Road, he doesn't mention that he saw Dr Vincent Tabak....

Bringing me to the conclusion that the people that CJ possibly saw at the gate, being Dr Vincent Tabak and Tanja Morson,... Joanna Yeates may or may not have been with them... I am not saying she was...

But CJ.. has furnished us with 2 pieces of evidence...  He tells us at the Leveson he thinks it was Friday.... But by saying thinks it was he is not committing himself to a said day.....

But using the information from the program and DCI Phil Jones, using the information from trial and using CJ's statements from programs and the Leveson... I think I have a clearer picture...

CJ... must be talking of Saturday 18th December 2010... I realistically cannot see it being any other day.... Evidence we have is the snow..... The snow is dirty... meaning people have trodden about said snow....

CJ clearly indicate that he by chance has come across Dr Vincent Tabak, whom is talking about how beautiful things are with the snow...   CJ, is telling us he is going to the gym.... But is he.... If he witness, people at the gate, and these people have been kept secret, there needs to be a reason for these peoples identity to be kept secret....

As I have stated, they should have been witness's if not suspects....

So I conclude the people at the gate are Dr Vincent Tabak and Tanja Morson, and that is the reason we do not know of there identity....

Because CJ is saying that at the time they believe Joanna Yeates was Murdered, Dr Vnicent Tabak is on Canygne Road with another witness putting him there.....

The people at the gate.... one of them has to be Dr Vincent Tabak... It's the same event.... CJ doesn't speak of a seperate event...

CJ speaking again at: 28:48 of the video....
bare that in mind... That statement on video of CJ's..

Leveson
Ok... So when did CJ move his car onto the drive?? Dr Vincent Tabak stating that CJ's car had changed position doesn't therefore sound too far fetched.......

But lets not point fingers..... Because we need the events to be correct.....

If CJ, tells us he has seen 2/3 people at the gate.... he has spoken to Dr Vincent Tabak, Dr Vincent Tabak is talking about snow, doesn't this add to the likely hood that CJ is talking about the day being Saturday,??.... but that the people he saw, and not only saw but obviously spoke to is Dr Vincent Tabak and who ever accompanied him....

You either have to say that CJ is lying to the Leveson that he parked his car on the road after the gym, and Dr Vincent Tabak witnessed and noticed said car had changed position..... Or, CJ did indeed get his days mixed up and his car of course, was on the drive of the morning of Saturday 18th December 2010 and on the evening of Saturday 18th 2010, is when he parked his car on the road after he had been to the gym, because , he had had difficulty that morning moving his car off the drive.... making complete sense as to why car is on road, and CJ saying he left it there quite true....

You then have to ask what relevance the ASDA video has?? It has NO time stamp upon it but the date of the 17th December 2010 is there for all to see....

* Saturday morning 18th December Dr Vincent Tabak helps CJ move his car from snowy parking space onto main
   part of the drive at Canygne Road.....

* When leaving for the gym CJ comes across Dr Vincent Tabak ( this has to be Saturday 18th December 2010)

* When returning from the gym at 9:00pm CJ parks his car on the road.....( obviously, he has already told us the
   state of the drive,... so again this has to be Saturday 18th December 2010... he tells us at the Leveson it might
   have been Friday, he doesn't say it was Friday!)

* He notices people at the gate, whether he heard or saw depends on what you want to believe, but.. that has to be
   Saturday 18th December 2010 also.....only follows)

* He converses with Dr Vincent Tabak as he has demonstrated..... in said program....  That too has to be Saturday
  18th December 2010...

* The only problem now is the time... if CJ is not sure of the day..... did he Dr Vincent Tabak when he returned from
   the gym, putting Dr Vincent Tabak on Canygne road in the snow at 9:00pm on Saturday 18th December 2010..
   taking photo's, meaning it is a extremely great possibility that CJ, saw Dr Vincent Tabak at the small gate, him
   then being one of the 2/3 people whom CJ: saw/heard!!!

So who was Dr Vincent Tabak with??  that is the important piece of information..... We have Kingdon telling us he heard a scream/ cry out of someone saying "help me" mid morning on Saturday 18th December 2010, he lived in the houses directly behind Joanna yeates bedroom window....

If we go with what I am proposing, then, Saturday 18th December 2010 has to be the day, there is no two ways about it.... But what of Dr Vincent Tabak...??

Is this where I question his guilt?? is this where I wonder what is true... Is this where I question how he is actually responsible....

If Dr Vincent Tabak on his own killed Joanna Yeates, one would say the story on the stand sort of explains it... But thats not good enough.... Has he been charged under Joint Enterprise??? That has to be the most likely way he was charged, because he has other people with him at a vital time... Meaning he must have had assistance in moving a body that he alone could not carry....

So who else did CJ witness at the gate??

Did Dr Vincent Tabak just assist someone, making him just as guilty and culpable under this law?? Did he knowingly assist??

Or is he completely Innocent of all charges levelled against him, as I have always contended based on what I have know of the case???

If the body is place on Longwood Lane at sometime on Saturday 18th December 2010, then that is a more likely prospect seeing as said snow is already there to cover said body up..... making her less visible... Then the image of Dr Vincent Tabak in his car on park Street on the 18th December 2010 would make sense, as they say he was driving around looking for a place to dispose of a body....

Is Dr Vincent Tabak involved up and to the point of getting rid of said body.... Does he really know who killed Joanna Yeates and has become enbroiled in this saga for some unknown reason.... Or as I have stated all along completely Innocent of this crime....

Who is lying about this case.... Well we know for a fact that Dr Vincent Tabak is lying which ever way you want to look at it.... The reason he is lying is unclear.....

But if CJ, is wholly Innocent as has been stated, and CJ is telling us information that he saw Dr Vincent Tabak on the evening Joanna Yeates ha been killed, do we now believe that Joanna Yeates was either killed on the 17th December 2010 or killed on the 18th December 2010?? With Kingdon's statement to maybe support that someone was having difficulty  mid morning n Saturday 18th December 2010??

They have never had an exact time and day of death of Joanna Yeates.... they go from the story on the stand told by Dr Vincent Tabak.....

but if we know take into account CJ's statement... Was Joanna Yeates killed on Saturday 18th December 2010??

It seems more likely, she could even have been removed from her home, on Saturday 18th December 2010 mid morning... making her flat not the scene of Crime... Lets not forget her parents believed she had been abducted.... And it is only Kingdons statement that gives us an indication she may have been abducted....

Therefore, she may have arrived home on Friday 17th December 2010...  she may have left her own belongings in the flat,.. but someone else closed the door... someone else, removed her from her flat and it's possible she was alive when she left said flat....

So what is the truth of The Murder of Joanna Yeates ??? And who was really involved with her death???

But one last thing... CJ says:
Now is he telling us that she went Missing on Friday 17th December 2010 as a fact....  or is he just stating what is now apparently known about, when she went Missing because of the trial.... ??

Don't let that date confuse you... Everything that is stated appears to point to the 18th December 2010 being the day that Joanna Yeates was last known to be alive.... CJ on his leveson statement could just be quoting from what is now know... But I cannot say that for sure....

the only way in which we can conclusively prove what day it was , is the CCTV of either CJ going to the Gym ...coming back from the gym, or at the gym... either way there must be footage of this....

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-15257562f

You Nine.

To yourself it would appear?
« Last Edit: October 17, 2018, 05:09:50 PM by Stephanie »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2336 on: October 17, 2018, 05:15:40 PM »
Its a pity you dont pick Tabak apart like you do CJ . What CJ does or doesn't do is irrelevant to the process
I can only use what is available... And I have no interviews of Dr Vincent Tabak, so it is obvious I am going to use the other people in this case....

CJ... he puts Dr Vincent Tabak on Canygne Road... he explains when his car is on his drive.... He explains when his car is parked on the road....  making Dr Vincent Tabak's statement accusing CJ that his car has changed position... "True".......If Friday 17th December 2010 is the day that Joanna Yeates was Murdered... Saturday morning therefore Dr Vincent tabak would have notice the car had changed position, because he had been to ASDA, and then helped CJ move said car on the Saturday 18th December 2010, when CJ tells us himself that is what Dr Vincent Tabak did... and the Police were excited with Dr Vincent Tabak being a witness to this...

Or it is Saturday 18th December 2010 when CJ saw Dr Vincent Tabak and the people at the gate.... He therefore leaves his car on the road because the drive is a difficult proposition....

Take your pick....




jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2337 on: October 17, 2018, 05:28:46 PM »
Maybe it would cut your work load down by a massive amount if you researched the differences in trial for people who plead guilty to not guilty

I have said over and over. Justsaying has given you lots of time explaining and today Stephanie also reminded you

For some reason you are fixated on CJ . Is that a deflection tactic so you dont have to face the other very good points put to you today?

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2338 on: October 17, 2018, 05:49:09 PM »
I can only use what is available... And I have no interviews of Dr Vincent Tabak, so it is obvious I am going to use the other people in this case......

Didn't you highlight one of his statements here http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=8060.msg496437#msg496437

(Top screenshot of 3)
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #2339 on: October 17, 2018, 05:55:50 PM »
Lets establish when said event actually happened and have said relevant witness making statements and appearing at trial....

It was and he did

You've posted the evidence yourself http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=8060.0;attach=14897

"Tabak gave several prepared (witness) statements to the police"

Can I just ask if Tabak was a busy little bee minding his own business that night and all that he claimed to be true is a lie, how did he manage to search about her murder before she was reported missing?

?

And do you now agree JY's body was NOT exposed?
« Last Edit: October 17, 2018, 06:02:20 PM by Stephanie »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation