The Defence Will State Their Case

[mrswah]

Can we please stop sniping at each other. You know what this thread is about. Either keep to the topic in hand, or don't post.

[[...]]

Well shall I in future state...

No Comment!!

Where have I heard that response before???? Oh yes, all throughout Dr Vincent Tabak's statements... 

The coincidences keep coming and coming... 

[[...]]

Can we please stop sniping at each other. You know what this thread is about. Either keep to the topic in hand, or don't post.

Apologies mrswah...  I was a keeper, i eventually get reeled in...

That is why I haven't responded to the posts, and talked to myself on here a lot of the time, i ignored it and thought that it was a wind up again..

[jixy]

Apologies mrswah...  I was a keeper, i eventually get reeled in...

That is why I haven't responded to the posts, and talked to myself on here a lot of the time, i ignored it and thought that it was a wind up again..

you were the instigator now pleading innocence....now that isnt familiar is it? NOPE

[[...]]

you were the instigator now pleading innocence....now that isnt familiar is it? NOPE

Jixy this is not a playground..

[jixy]

Nope I just quoted a fact. I know its rare on this thread but I have to try. Mrswah said so

[[...]]

And then I feel exhausted by it all, and question why I post on here... I don't really know what this site is about to be honest.. For all I know it could be a wind up in itself..

And everything I have looked at was in vain....

[[...]]

Nope I just quoted a fact. I know its rare on this thread but I have to try. Mrswah said so

At least we agree on something... Not one thing stated about this case is fact.... It could all be fiction...  And you wonder why I keep asking what is real or not...!!

[jixy]

At least we agree on something... Not one thing stated about this case is fact.... It could all be fiction...  And you wonder why I keep asking what is real or not...!!

I know but you have been dedicated with your version of the case. give you that. The facts appeared in the court room, but sadly didnt make it into your posts

[Caroline]

The image amount changed for one...

Which Sex offenders register are you refering too, that stupid data base on the internet, made by a person obssesed with paedo's..
I have not and am not likely to see any evidence of Dr Vincent Tabak being on any register, as I do not have access..

I do not know his trial number for that offence either... !

NO! Not the one on the internet! The state sex offenders register!
https://www.itv.com/news/westcountry/2015-03-02/peadophile-killer-vincent-tabak-jailed-for-another-10-months/

There's a LOT you don't know but then again, what you don't know - you make up!

[jixy]

or does know but seems to pretend they dont know!

[Caroline]

The simple fact that people from different countries understand terms differently is extremely important to this case... I could write my my local dialect and you wouldn't know what the Hell I was saying!

And that applies to many things... context country, regional dialect... etc etc...

No one knows what the hell you're on about most of the time and dialect and language is yet another distraction you're trying to weave in.

[Caroline]

Jixy, do you really believe if you keep saying the same thing to me I am going to change my mind... Child abuse images/ watching porn, are not relevant to the Murder of Joanna Yeates, no matter how many times you tell me they are...

I am dealing with one case... That is The Murder... Other issues have been dealt with seperately, and were not relevant at the trial... The images of the children again, dealt with, apparently some years and years later... which makes no sense either... !!

So trying to make me look or feel guilty by insinuating that I support people who have inapproriate images of Children and are sentenced for such a crime won't wash...

The issue in hand is whether or not Dr Vincent Tabak killed Joanna yeates, and i have said I do not believe that he did, the tale on the stand hasn't got evidence to back it up!

Who is trying to make you feel 'guilty'? What an odd remark! The reason I asked you the question was due to the flippant comment you made a few days ago when you insinuated that 'he was simply looking at pictures' (or words to that effect). Just today you have played down the images by suggesting they couldn't have been illegal when you know fine well he received an extra sentence in connection with them!

By the way I have no idea who  Andrew Ashman is/was and not sure why you have injected him into the picture!

[[...]]

I didn't inject him into the picture, that was another forum member, I too had No idea who he was...

[jixy]

I didn't inject him into the picture, that was another forum member, I too had No idea who he was...

Oh yes you did!