Tabak saying he is guilty not only of taking a life but nasty viewing habits doesnt register with you and you choose to ignore the views of the man himself. So its quite easy to see why you wouldnt listen to anyone on this forum or their views however much they make sense to everyone else!
Jixy... I came here because I had doubts about Dr Vincent Tabak's conviction, i wanted to understand how everyone was told he plead guilty to manslaughter in May 2011 and the media told us so, not only that they told us that the CPS wasn't accepting this plea and would go to trial... I thought it was the judges decision on that point, but I don't know law so i'll leave that there...
Therefore, why have a man take the stand, to tell a story that basically was all ready in the public domain in one way or another?
I do not understand the silence.... I do not understand why the media are all over Joanna Yeates virtually empty flat that is apparently frozen in time, Missing the Christmas tree for starters, that Mrs yeates spoke of and many of the furnishings that were there before... Nothing from this Flat brought to trial to bolster and secure a conviction against Dr Vincent tabak
A Flat that to me looks staged....
But people are happy, that if the jury are reminded that Dr vincent Tabak has plead guilty to manslaughter, before he is on trial, and that manslaughter plea is mentioned in the media day in and day out, whilst the trial is taking place....
Then you put a man on the stand to explain how he apparently did it.... The juries mind is obviously already made up... This was a high profile case, Bristol people were on the jury... Dean Armstrong himself was amazed at the interest...
The public are baying for blood, one suspect has been cleared... The public want someone to pay....
So whatever Dr Vincent Tabak stated on the stand at trial, his goose was already cooked (imo)... No-one really gave a damn how what and where, they would not give him an inch, or believe him.... People on the internet at the time wanted to lynch him when he was arrested...
So no I do not believe what was said, the way in which this trial was conducted, doesn't't seem legal to me, but what do I know...
But I know the odds were stacked against a man whom wasn't given the opportunity to face over 21 witness's if memory serves me correctly, who's statements were read out at trial and did not make an appearance... all these statements being hearsay (imo)
But you along with everyone else appear to be happy about this circus....
Who's Billy Now !!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lS4o5c4vFPkEdit... How can you appear on the stand
Guilty to be proved even
Guiltier??
What happened to the presumption of innocence and the Prosecution proving their case.... Not the Defence giving them a leg up!