Author Topic: Former Portuguese detective Gonçalo Amaral wins appeal in damages trial.  (Read 529091 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline John

I'm sure you can spot the irony (not quite the right word, since irony implies humour) of the present, joint, enquiry holding hope of, yet, finding Madeleine alive and a separate decision in civil proceedings that Amaral is entitled to assert that Madeleine is dead, and even, that her parents know she is dead, caused her death, concealed her remains and launched a fabricated 'appeal' in their (dead!) daughter's name.

Can't you?

The problem being that nobody knows what happened to Madeleine which renders all theories valid even now.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline mercury

They went extremely low from early 2007 meanng theyd lost the argument from the start,oh well, same old same old, must go now, soent too long on here already
« Last Edit: April 19, 2016, 11:19:11 PM by John »

ferryman

  • Guest
The problem being that nobody knows what happened to Madeleine which renders all theories valid even now.

No.

It doesn't

Offline misty

The judges made their own objective analysis of the facts and delivered their verdict.

Do you consider it to be in the interests of justice if one of the appeal court judges had been involved in a previous decision on the same case?

Offline Mr Gray

The problem being that nobody knows what happened to Madeleine which renders all theories valid even now.
no it doesn't John..you are totally wrong...certain scenarios have been ruled out

Offline John

no it doesn't John..you are totally wrong...certain scenarios have been ruled out

By whom?
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.


Offline carlymichelle

By whom?

and how does davel know this if the  police  dont??

ferryman

  • Guest
By whom?

The Portuguese prosecutors, who ruled that there was no case for the McCanns to answer (for one).

Scotland Yard for another ....

stephen25000

  • Guest
SY

They have blatantly come up with nothing.

Offline John

SY

That's even funnier than Carly's last.  SY haven't a bloody clue even now.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

The Portuguese prosecutors, who ruled that there was no case for the McCanns to answer (for one).

Scotland Yard for another ....

Yes, on evidence which existed at the archive.  The prosecutors also stated that the McCanns had lost the opportunity to demostrate what they claimed happened.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline carlymichelle

That's even funnier than Carly's last.  SY haven't a bloody clue even now.

 8)-)))  I take that as an  compliment  i  think??

Offline pathfinder73

no it doesn't John..you are totally wrong...certain scenarios have been ruled out

Is that the reason it's unsolved?
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline carlymichelle

...

clarrie was  here in  australia last week or a few  weeks ago most ignored  him  8(0(*
« Last Edit: April 20, 2016, 06:35:52 AM by ShiningInLuz »