This is a staged fake news report about a murderer who doesn't exist... https://www.channel4.com/news/tabak-so-sorry-for-killing-joanna-yeates
I have just viewed the news report,
News desk Reporter: The man who killed Joanna Yeates has broken down in the witness box, as he recalled the moment she died. Giving evidence in his own defence Vincent Tabak apologised to her family who were there in court watching, but he said he hadn't meant ti kill her. our home affairs correspondent Andy Davis was there.
Andy Davis: This is the first time David and Teresa Yeates have listened to the man who killed their daughter talk about that night. They walked into a packed court room this morning, with Joanna 's brother Chris beside them.
They would sit in silence side by side as the tall bespectable figure of Vincent Tabak walked within a few feet of them to take his place at the witness box.
In a dark suit and blue tie shoulders slightly hunched, the 33 year old who has a PHD in studying how people move within office spaces, spoke briefly about his upbringing in Holland, his move to the UK for work and then the night he killed his next door neighbour.
William Clegg QC for the defence here on the left at one point asked Vincent Tabak to close his eyes and try to relive those moments, in an attempt to time how long it took to strangle her. When I say start said the barrister to Vincent Tabak, I want you to say now, when you think the incident ended. Start said Mr. Clegg, Vincent Tabak shut his eyes the court fell completely silent. After a few seconds with his eyes still shut he started rubbing his forehead with his eyes still shut, leaning to the right slightly, a few seconds more passed in complete silence and then he said now. 15 seconds the jurors heard, seconds in which Tabak claimed he had tried to stop Joanna screaming , trying to calm her down.
He claimed she had invited him in that night, and then he went to kiss her after she made a flirtatious comment, he alleged, likening herself to her cat going into places she shouldn't. He never intended to kill her he said and then he panicked when he had. He claimed he felt guilt, that it would haunt him for the rest of his life and described his decision to abandon Joanna's body later that night in a country lane as horrendous.
"Whilst trying to lift her body, I was sin a state of total panic and stress and I just left her on the road side verge and I'm so sorry for doing that. I know I put Jo's parents and Greg, through a week of hell and I still can't believe that I did that." he said.
Nigel Lickley QC closest to camera, in cross examination for the prosecution suggested to Tabak that there'd been no panic, that he was lying, that he had been calculating , manipulative and in complete control throughout.
"All you had to do Vincent Tabak, was to walk out of the flat. Correct?
"Yes" said Tabak " I didn't".
"No" said Nigel Lickley "because you decided to put a hand round her throat, did you not??"
"Yes"
"And you squeezed her throat?"
"Yes" Tabak replied.
"What was she doing?"
"I can't remember"
"Yes you can" said the barrister. "What was she doing"?
"I can't remember".
Nigel Lickley went on, " She was fighting was she not, she was struggling"
Tabak replied. " She was not struggling"
And there was a point during the cross examination, when as Vincent Tabak was describing how he put his hand on Joanna Yeates neck. Nigel Lickley QC intervened and said. "Show us what you did".
And Vincent Tabak paused, he raised his hand to his head, very briefly,then he put his hand out like that, with his fingers slightly splayed and looked directly at the barrister questioning him,
There were other highly charged moments in that court today, particularly when some very graphic and harrowing images of Joanna's injuries were shown, to the court, to the family and to the defendant.
Nigel Lickley QC said to Tabak. "Thats you gripping her arms in part of the struggle, is it not Vincent Tabak". he replied " I don't know".. Mr Lickley went on. "Account for the injuries Mr Tabak ". And Vincent Tabak replied. " I don't know".
Andy Davis in Bristol
The description Andy Davis gives, resonated with something I had seen recently, and my love of subtitled programs. It was a Finish program that caught my attention, and the main character, whom fascinated me from the start.. He appeared odd, strange ,random a bit different. I could relate to that. His calm approach to solving problems in crime looked alien, his hand movement and his counting method and concentration, his method of recollection, in his silence, would above all have anyone asking how he ticks..
So when I watched the Channel 4 news report it clicked... I had always believed before that what Dr Vincent Tabak stated on the stand was a recollection of information that he was already party too via news media of the time. Nothing new had come to trial, nothing new that we really all didn't know already.
It was these 2 descriptions from the reporter, that made the connection in my mind..
Vincent Tabak shut his eyes the court fell completely silent. After a few seconds with his eyes still shut he started rubbing his forehead with his eyes still shut, leaning to the right slightly, a few seconds more passed in complete silence and then he said now. And Vincent Tabak paused, he raised his hand to his head, very briefly,then he put his hand out like that, with his fingers slightly splayed and looked directly at the barrister questioning him,
The characters active mind is never far away from a thought or idea that, he heard or saw, he tries to connect the dots.
When Andy Davis described the action of Dr Vincent Tabak in the witness box, I had a realisation, that this was probably the technique that Dr Vincent Tabak used in his learning, his ability to recollect information stored in his memory, information he has read or seen, I am putting forward the idea, this is what makes Dr Vincent Tabak tick, he uses a technique whether learnt or natural, to recall the volume of information he knows in relation to his PHD and subsequent job..
So applying that to this situation, we can see that it falls flat, his recollection is vague, his recollection is missing detail, his recollection doesn't exist on many counts, as he falls to recall and answer over 80 questions..
I tried to understand why he couldn't remember and why he appeared vague... Him breaking down in tears and apologising to The Yeates...
The case is off... I know it is... questions have been asked as to why he would admit guilt, questions have been asked why he would take the stand and tell a story, a story that is just that....
But if he was protecting someone, if he unwittingly or deliberately, hampered the Police Investigation, if as Ann Reddrop states, he was Clever, then we need to put that into context...
I do not know what technique that Dr Vincent Tabak may have used for his recollection, there is one technique I have found called 'The Memory Palace", but I am sure there are others...
5. Visit Your Palace
At this point, you are done memorizing the items. If you’re new to the technique, though, you’ll probably need to do a little rehearsal, repeating the journey at least once in your mind.
If you start from the same point and follow the same route, the memorized items will come to your mind instantly as you look at the journey’s selected features. Go from the beginning to the end of your route, paying attention to those features and replaying the scenes in your mind. When you get to the end of your route, turn around and walk in the opposite direction until you get to the starting point.
In the end, it’s all a matter of developing your visualization skills. The more relaxed you are, the easier it will be and the more effective your memorization will be.
As I do not know anything about Dr Vincent Tabak , his technique may be natural, and this was never explored at trial, we were given very limited information as to what if any techniques Dr vincent Tabak used in his education or his every day life.. There are huge swaths of information missing from, not only Dr Vincent Tabak's account on the stand, but about him as a person.
Going back to the program a mo... Kari The Detective, has a technique, where he makes oblong boxes on the floor, where in front of him may be the images from the crime scene, he paces back and forth, bare footed, within these boxes, moving his toes as if they are counting, touching his head, either cupping it with two hands or just fingers, thoughts are constantly in his head, as he says.." thoughts occupy my mind without even trying"..
He tries to recall what he has seen and what may have been stated, were connections between places and people come together.. Where sometimes he may appear disinterested as his brain is sifting through information and images that, he has swimming around his head..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjOFzeVynVYI do not know his technique, but I will put this scenario forward... Dr Vincent Tabak is just such a person, he has images etc swimming around, he has a technique in which he recalls situations, times, places etc and he has used this technique throughout his life..
So when we get to trial, his recollection is useless, his recollection is no more than we all know, because that is exactly it, he is only recalling what has already gone before... He cannot recall in detail, what actually took place.
Maybe he thought he was protecting someone when he gave an account to the police, when we do not know if he always stated no comment or he actually said quite a lot... Because if i am correct in my scenario, he would have run rings around the Police using a technique and recalling very thing that he knew, everything that was either in the media or on social media... He would have been able to put to see those discrepancies in anyones account, having an ability to memorises information.. Having the ability to recall details, that others cannot.
If he thought he was protecting, helping someone when he first went to the Police or when he was interviewed in Holland, he may have actually stated something, that a person had divulged to him, he may have given a piece of information he didn't realise.. Putting him now in the frame for this Murder...
We really have no idea of the people that Dr Vincent Tabak knew, or the acquaintances he may have had, no idea of the people he may have spoken too about his neighbour...
We have no idea whom the Police had already interviewed and whether or not Dr Vincent Tabak stated something that was held within those interviews..
I believe that this is a possible reason why Ann Reddrop had Dr Vincent Tabak in her sights, because it had to be the Holland interview that triggered something, (imo). Because up until this point, Dr Vincent Tabak was not considered a suspect, Dr Vincent Tabak had apparently been eliminated..
I am having a recollection myself as I type, and DC Karen Thomas stating that Dr Vincent Tabak was over interested in Forensics, was one of the reasons alarm bells started to ring...
Well consider this... Was Dr Vincent Tabak trying to recall something that happened, something he knew, something about the areas that the police were forensically testing didn't add up in his own mind. Questions posed by the police allowing for an idea or thought to swim throw his mind.. Making the idea of him asking questions about forensics making more sense.... And maybe he has in his own mind questions of what someone may have told him, or what he had seen or knew himself.
Did the Police/ CPS feel that Dr Vincent Tabak had tried to bamboozle them, with his technique, whilst he was trying to protect someone else..??
Could they not comprehend how someone had the ability to recall in such detail, what they knew? Did the just assume that he must have been there and been party to this, because they had never come across a person such as Dr Vincent Tabak...
Did he humiliate them and their efforts and point out to them, where they went wrong... Did he make them feel inadequate by the sheer fact he was able to recall what had been stated... Did he in fact reply to the questions posed on his arrest.. Or stay silent, knowing that their stupidity, would fail them....
Ann says he was cunning and manipulative young man. But put it into context, she then says, and I have pointed it out before..
"He knew exactly what he was (deali) doing with, when he killed Jo Yeates."
Dealing with...? As I have stated, did he run rings around them, did he in fact embarrass, humiliate and generally discredit the system??
Is Dr Vincent Tabak actually in prison for Murdering Jo Yeates, or for protecting someone? Or did he simply work out who the real killer was???
There is far more to this than meets the eye, there is far more to Dr Vincent Tabak than we have been told... For an intelligent man that can only recollect the information that was known and the apparent circumstances of Joanna Yeates disappearance, and who at trial fails to answer over 80 questions, and it is not until he sees the images all over the court room that he bows his head and wipes away a tear,and apologises to The Yeates.. I believe that is because, Joanna Yeates was savagely attacked, beaten, strangled, maybe any other type of injury, injuries that were not divulged to the public in the beginning, 43 significant injuries that the public intitially were told didn't exist...
I believe when he saw the full horror of what had happened to Joanna Yeates, he realised that what had happened was far greater than he had been told..
Whether or not the whole case is true..... Is something I have been battling with...
If he believed or knew that the whole case wasn't true, maybe he was just playing a game with the Police and sent them around in circles.. I don't know...
But I do believe that whatever was stated on the stand was already in the public domain, I believe the concocted story on the stand, was just that.....
I believe that there was a reason that Dr Vincent Tabak was facing trial for Murder... And I do not believe that the reason was because he actually killed her... In my opinion of course....
https://litemind.com/memory-palace/