1. No motive for LM to kill [Name removed]. The Police theory that it was because of KT....people age 14/15 carrying out murders over a flirty connection with another person? Show me evidence of one case where that's happened at age 14/15.
2. No DNA at murder scene, no DNA on LM's clothes or in his house. Professor Alan Jamieson has already more or less said that would be impossible.
3. Anyone who knows anything about human psychology and recall knows that the first statements given should always be taken as the most likely to be true and accurate. In this case the truth is that the dog alerted LM at the wall. If LM actually did do it, is he going to lead people straight to the body lol? Why would he do that? The changed statements were fabrications to point the blame towards LM.
4. The witness sighting of someone at the gate at the Newbattle end of the path by 2 witnesses driving past at 600pm.......both of them said in Court that person was definitely NOT LM.
5. The timeline is just plain stupid. If the murder happened at 515pm (ignoring the fact everything points to it being later). How did LM manage to get back to Newbattle where he met other young people 40 minutes later? He wouldn't have got back to the house until 530pm, so he had 20 minutes to get rid of all clothes, clean himself up and get rid of all forensic evidence in the house. He defeated the laws of forensic science?