In my opinion you have no intention of accepting any other opinions except your own, so proving anything to you is impossible. In your opinion you understand evidence better than anyone, even Supreme Court judges.
It is not up to you to tell me how i might or might not act. You show acomplete lack of understanding of my reasoning.
Why should I accept others opinions..... I accept what the evidence supports. CMOMM gives alot of weight to the dog alerts...I don't accept that because the experts dont support it.
You are wrong about the SC judges too...they ruled mainly on law....not evidence.......and figures you quoted showed they had a particularly poor record when challenged at the ECHR.
You think you know better than the whole worlds scientists who say smoking causes cancer...but you think you know better.
Ive always said taht sceptics are sceptics because they dont understand the evidence...I think that is clear to anyone with an open mind