The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner

[Wonderfulspam]

29 Jan 2022

Madeleine McCann No.1 suspect swapped child abuse images with undertaker

The prime suspect in the Madeleine McCann case swapped child abuse images and depraved online messages with an undertaker.

The mortician gave “a full confession” when quizzed by German police and admitted he was a “regular customer” of convicted paedophile Christian Brueckner.

It is understood material he handed over to officers now forms part of evidence being used against Brueckner.

.....................

In 2013, Brueckner shared a string of sick messages with the undertaker, including some about snatching and imprisoning a toddler.

Brueckner talks about making films to “document exactly how she is tormented”.

The horrifying Skype conversation was found when Brueckner was arrested for molesting his girlfriend’s daughter.

German prosecutors say they have “concrete” evidence against him – and he is their only suspect in Madeleine’s case.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/madeleine-mccann-no1-suspect-swapped-26085855

State's witness No 2. The Undertaker

Exhibit B: Brueckner's Skype Chat

[Wonderfulspam]

The BKA isn't trying to find out what happened to Madeleine, they're trying to find enough evidence to charge Brueckner.

They already have enough evidence to charge, according to Wolters circa 2020. In this thread we should attempt to present all the known evidence, & discuss the possible unknowns. Wolters says that if we knew the evidence they have, we would be in no doubt.

[Brietta]

The BKA isn't trying to find out what happened to Madeleine, they're trying to find enough evidence to charge Brueckner.

Charge Brueckner with what?

Got yourself into a bit of an evidential oxymoron there - what!

[Brietta]

They already have enough evidence to charge, according to Wolters circa 2020. In this thread we should attempt to present all the known evidence, & discuss the possible unknowns. Wolters says that if we knew the evidence they have, we would be in no doubt.

The point is, no-one will know what evidence will be used against Brueckner in the law courts should his case come to trial.

Tabloid musings are just that - musings.  Not evidence.

[Wonderfulspam]

The point is, no-one will know what evidence will be used against Brueckner in the law courts should his case come to trial.

Tabloid musings are just that - musings.  Not evidence.

Busching's testimony is & will be evidence.

The Undertakers testimony, along with the Skype chat may be too.

I think it's quite possible that Brueckner may have confessed & talked about MM to others.
Maybe online & in person.

[G-Unit]

The point is, no-one will know what evidence will be used against Brueckner in the law courts should his case come to trial.

Tabloid musings are just that - musings.  Not evidence.

I think bringing Brueckner to trial would have happened if it was possible.

[Brietta]

Busching's testimony is & will be evidence.

The Undertakers testimony, along with the Skype chat may be too.

I think it's quite possible that Brueckner may have confessed & talked about MM to others.
Maybe online & in person.

All supposition.
You simply have no idea what evidence the BKA have.  Nor do you have the slightest notion what evidence will be used when or if the case against Brueckner reaches the charging stage.

Give the guy a break.  Innocent until proven guilty or unless your surname is McCann.

[Brietta]

I think bringing Brueckner to trial would have happened if it was possible.

Why do you think that?  What do you think the rush is?

[Wonderfulspam]

All supposition.
You simply have no idea what evidence the BKA have. Nor do you have the slightest notion what evidence will be used when or if the case against Brueckner reaches the charging stage.

Give the guy a break.  Innocent until proven guilty or unless your surname is McCann.

This is untrue. We know the evidence against Brueckner is concrete & utterly convincing & if we saw it we'd be in no doubt.
In this thread we can explore the possibilities. The knowns & unknowns.
I've given two examples of the known possible evidence so far. Two confessions.
Can you suggest any other forms or examples of concrete evidence the BKA might have?

[Wonderfulspam]

I think bringing Brueckner to trial would have happened if it was possible.

Some people are convinced it still might. Not sure what convinces them of such though, they won't explain. But I'm sure it's utterly convincing whatever the reason is.

[John]

Weren't there supposed to have been photographs hidden in some bunker in Germany?

[Wonderfulspam]

Weren't there supposed to have been photographs hidden in some bunker in Germany?

Yes. Brueckner's memory stick from the abandoned factory contained child pornography.

[Brietta]

This is untrue. We know the evidence against Brueckner is concrete & utterly convincing & if we saw it we'd be in no doubt.
In this thread we can explore the possibilities. The knowns & unknowns.
I've given two examples of the known possible evidence so far. Two confessions.
Can you suggest any other forms or examples of concrete evidence the BKA might have?

No you can't!

The thread title specifies "The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner"

Anything else is speculation.  And since the Germans have made it crystal clear they are not sharing - I don't think what you think is evidence or what you think isn't evidence comes into it.

[Wonderfulspam]

No you can't!

The thread title specifies "The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner"

Anything else is speculation.  And since the Germans have made it crystal clear they are not sharing - I don't think what you think is evidence or what you think isn't evidence comes into it.

The thread title is the The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner. Yes.
But if you read the opening post I ask a number of questions.

What is the known evidence?

What are the possible unknowns?

[Brietta]

The thread title is the The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner. Yes.
But if you read the opening post I ask a number of questions.

What is the known evidence?

What are the possible unknowns?

No-one on this forum can answer any of those questions.  The BKA are playing their cards very close to the chest and are sharing evidence with no-one.

Until they lay or drop charges - the general public and even other investigators - won't know what evidence they are using.