Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
The path area is used by 'occasional' dog walkers, probably repeat ones who stay close enough to it, such as where DD stayed (Reeds Drive). The line of houses where the back gardens adjoined the field. The rest of that street in general, talking something like 20 buildings, 4 in block? Other areas of Newtongrange not so much, far more places closer to hand to use than that field/paths. Park, waste ground, woodland and many more fields.

The same does not apply to Easthouses at all. Not counting for recent new builds next to the lane of that AB sighting. Two parks and complex, other fields, an expansive grass area (Off Lothian Drive) leading into the golf course/Abbey woods. Most residents would really be going out of their way to use the RDP area to walk their dogs on a daily basis. Not to say some don't but generally that would account for a small % of them.

So, it is as it is - Used by dog walkers who stay next to it (which consists of little) Used as a cut through like we see with LK going home, the boys on the moped the same. DD who used an entry point to gain further access into the golf course/Abbey woods. Others from his street would use Lady path and enter off the lane of the AB sighting if heading into the Abbey woods. [Name removed] with LM, joining two areas together. But to note here, on the Newbattle side there is nothing, not one single house next to that path entrance/exit. People going for long walks further afield, using it as part of the Esk Trail. It is not the busy thoroughfare applied.

Newbattle Road is over a mile long. It is split into three areas, Newtongrange, Newbattle and Eskbank. Newbattle is tiny in comparison to the others. It consists of the Abbey/grounds/small industrial estate. Church, scattered cottages and the estate LM stayed in, which sits in off the road. Not a lot of reasons at all for anyone using the RDP as a short cut to Newbattle. It would be very selectively used, depending on locality of residence, for anyone to be using it as a short cut to Eskbank/Dalkeith or vice versa?

An isolated path in relevance to proximity to anywhere. The nearest houses are beside the top half of the field, across the expanse of it, then nothing at all. So again, the reason for that ban, the isolated nature of the path. A girl who 'only' had reason to know of the path because of the boy she had began to go out with. Her sister was not brought up in the area. Neither attended the school. But scrape people do attempting to apply lies to a girl who was telling the truth. She knew of some path, assumed it was the Lady Path, had not used the RDP before, ever. Had absolutely no reason to lie not any reason to have been using that path.
22
Will Investigator Jon Longman Tell Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry About Seema & Davinder Misra & The Alleged Illegal Immigrant Saga?
👇🏼
https://youtu.be/5KkmzLMDA0Y?si=yxPMabhzPXQbGuCp
23
If F and D were up there having a picnic, what's the hurry to get rid of the moped before the Police seized it? Lothian Police made a pigs ear of this case allowing the crime scene to be contaminated and failing to properly investigate other potential suspects.

They were chased from the Toolhire place after it closed at 5pm. The drove up the path stalling several times before getting it going and heading home. No one witnessed them on the path and they admitted the bike was against the wall at one point (not the exact V). The bike was unreliable and taken to Melrose scrapyard shortly after where it lay for weeks before being collected by the main metal merchant.

Anyone trying to hide DNA etc would have doused it in petrol, not left it out in a scrapyard for weeks. Just 2 lads mucking about on a moped, nothing more. You seem to be following the SL/SF magic carpet theory with the blood soaked killer being whisked away. Do you really think the killer would rely on a clapped out stalling moped to make a getaway or the simplest explanation that he was already on the woodside of RDP and didn't need to return to the main path at all.

If you are implicating the moped lads, why were they at the Toolhire place in full view? Were they then summoned by your killer asking for a lift home? Why would your killer need a lift on a moped if he could walk?
24
1. Streets are often quiet. People use RD Path for jogging, cycling,walking dogs etc.
2. I answered this one in the other post above.
3. The bleach was discovered about 10 days after the murder. It was not where the body was found. Bleach is known to prevent dogs picking up the scent of blood. It suggests somebody bleached the ground where the murder took place then dragged the body up beside the V. This is 100% certain because almost no blood was found under the victim's body. That is scientifically impossible - so the body was moved to the V from somewhere else. It may have only been moved a short distance, but no blood under the body proves conclusively it had been moved.
re: your answer to the bleach - when are suggesting this was used to clean up the scene? 
25
I'm not defensive at all. I'm just pointing out that some people may find such terminology offensive. Let's not dwell on that.

The time it took him is not really key, whether it was 20m ambling or 10 minutes walking fast does not alter the fact that he allegedly walked the full length of that path and was seen by nobody. I'm not going to try and convince you how unlikely that was. Why don't you try it at the end of June on a sunny dry day and see if you can go unseen from one end to the other? As I said, I've done it, more than once actually and both times I was seen by at least several people.

There's a very obvious reason why nobody came forward that saw anyone leaving the murder scene covered in blood, because that person did not leave by walking on Roan's Dyke Path because of the risk of being seen. Why would there be 2 people up that path at the V at 5.15pm the alleged time of the murder, that seemed to develop amnesia in Court regarding what they were doing? All they said in Court was that they didn't remember what they were doing, now not even the "Mitchell Did It Brigade" can possibly argue that is even remotely believable. If they weren't trying to hide something, they would remember what they were doing, be it smoking hash, having a picnic or any other activity someone might do in the woods. However, these 2 "can't remember"? Anyone with 3 brain cells knows that they lied about that. So the question is - WHY did they have to lie? Those 2 were involved in some way in this, even if it's only as far as hearing something or seeing something.

It's also very strange that the killer manages to disappear off the face of the Earth, but at 5.15pm there was a moped parked right next to where the murder took place. How coincidental that there just happens to be a means of escape sitting there at exactly 5.15pm without risking walking anywhere to get away. A means of escape which Police were never able to examine because it was disposed of in a hurry. If F and D were up there having a picnic, what's the hurry to get rid of the moped before the Police seized it? Lothian Police made a pigs ear of this case allowing the crime scene to be contaminated and failing to properly investigate other potential suspects.
so is it your view that two people were involved in Jodi’s murder?  Are the two people you mention by initial the same people as the moped rider(s)?  Sorry, I find the use of initials and nicknames confusing and tend to switch off when they are dragged into the discussion.  What’s your opinion on his / their motive for the murder?
26
more observations and questions.
1) I’ve just walked back from the Doctors in a built up residential part of a town which has around 80,000 inhabitants at 2pm on a dry bright day.  I passed 2 people on the pavement on my 10 minute walk. 
2) If it would have been impossible to not be seen leaving the scene of the crime covered in blood then why was no one seen leaving the scene of the crime covered in blood?
3) if bleach had been used at the scene of the crime to put off the trained police dogs then how was it that Mitchell’s amateur cadaver hound was able to instantly detect the presence of a corpse when passing the scene?

1. Streets are often quiet. People use RD Path for jogging, cycling,walking dogs etc.
2. I answered this one in the other post above.
3. The bleach was discovered about 10 days after the murder. It was not where the body was found. Bleach is known to prevent dogs picking up the scent of blood. It suggests somebody bleached the ground where the murder took place then dragged the body up beside the V. This is 100% certain because almost no blood was found under the victim's body. That is scientifically impossible - so the body was moved to the V from somewhere else. It may have only been moved a short distance, but no blood under the body proves conclusively it had been moved.
27
Gosh you are incredibly defensive and prickly aren’t you?  So you accuse me of assuming that a 14 year old boy would walk at at least the same speed if not faster than a 60 year old woman but apparently know that it would take him around 20 minutes to walk 3/4 of a mile??  How does that work then?  How do you know he wasn’t a fast walker, or even ran part of the way? And since when was lame a derogatory remark to describe someone with a walking impediment?  I can’t keep up with the correct terminology for that so please forgive me, though I wasn’t even accusing you of anything. I have a walking impediment btw, following a serious fall, should have mentioned that when I wrote about how long it takes me to walk into town.   And let’s not forget SOMEONE murdered Jodi on this apparently heavily frequented path and apparently NOONE came forward to describe the ACTUAL murderer leaving the scene of the crime covered in blood!  How ludicrous is that?!

I'm not defensive at all. I'm just pointing out that some people may find such terminology offensive. Let's not dwell on that.

The time it took him is not really key, whether it was 20m ambling or 10 minutes walking fast does not alter the fact that he allegedly walked the full length of that path and was seen by nobody. I'm not going to try and convince you how unlikely that was. Why don't you try it at the end of June on a sunny dry day and see if you can go unseen from one end to the other? As I said, I've done it, more than once actually and both times I was seen by at least several people.

There's a very obvious reason why nobody came forward that saw anyone leaving the murder scene covered in blood, because that person did not leave by walking on Roan's Dyke Path because of the risk of being seen. Why would there be 2 people up that path at the V at 5.15pm the alleged time of the murder, that seemed to develop amnesia in Court regarding what they were doing? All they said in Court was that they didn't remember what they were doing, now not even the "Mitchell Did It Brigade" can possibly argue that is even remotely believable. If they weren't trying to hide something, they would remember what they were doing, be it smoking hash, having a picnic or any other activity someone might do in the woods. However, these 2 "can't remember"? Anyone with 3 brain cells knows that they lied about that. So the question is - WHY did they have to lie? Those 2 were involved in some way in this, even if it's only as far as hearing something or seeing something.

It's also very strange that the killer manages to disappear off the face of the Earth, but at 5.15pm there was a moped parked right next to where the murder took place. How coincidental that there just happens to be a means of escape sitting there at exactly 5.15pm without risking walking anywhere to get away. A means of escape which Police were never able to examine because it was disposed of in a hurry. If F and D were up there having a picnic, what's the hurry to get rid of the moped before the Police seized it? Lothian Police made a pigs ear of this case allowing the crime scene to be contaminated and failing to properly investigate other potential suspects.





28
Wake The Dead with Roberta Glass 'Sheldon Johnson & innocence fraud'
👇🏼
https://onegreatworknetwork.com/sean-mccann/wtd-ep-115-roberta-glass-sheldon-johnson-innocence-fraud
29
Yes, at least part of it.
30
Very clever. So you now know which speed he walked the path if he ever did? Person or persons who did not recall seeing him? Yeah there's a horrific murder and people who saw him didn't bother reporting it because they "didn't recall seeing him"?  Honestly, have you any idea how ludicrous that sounds? I don't think much of your derogatory use of the word lame either.
Gosh you are incredibly defensive and prickly aren’t you?  So you accuse me of assuming that a 14 year old boy would walk at at least the same speed if not faster than a 60 year old woman but apparently know that it would take him around 20 minutes to walk 3/4 of a mile??  How does that work then?  How do you know he wasn’t a fast walker, or even ran part of the way? And since when was lame a derogatory remark to describe someone with a walking impediment?  I can’t keep up with the correct terminology for that so please forgive me, though I wasn’t even accusing you of anything. I have a walking impediment btw, following a serious fall, should have mentioned that when I wrote about how long it takes me to walk into town.   And let’s not forget SOMEONE murdered Jodi on this apparently heavily frequented path and apparently NOONE came forward to describe the ACTUAL murderer leaving the scene of the crime covered in blood!  How ludicrous is that?! 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10