Author Topic: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano  (Read 40081 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

debunker

  • Guest
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #15 on: April 10, 2013, 08:43:05 PM »
It's an open document in FARO Court of Law, go there and look for yourself - I did.

So you are saying that he is no longer subject to his prison sentence?

I call bullshit

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #16 on: April 10, 2013, 09:46:12 PM »
The child murderess cipriano wasn't convicted on the strength of a confession alone was she  ?

I seem to remember reading the most horrific details of the little girl's finger nails being  left in the front door  (  as she had clung onto it while being dragged back into the house  )   8(8-))


debunker

  • Guest
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #17 on: April 10, 2013, 10:21:47 PM »
The child murderess cipriano wasn't convicted on the strength of a confession alone was she  ?

I seem to remember reading the most horrific details of the little girl's finger nails being  left in the front door  (  as she had clung onto it while being dragged back into the house  )   8(8-))

Cite?

Offline Faithlilly

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #18 on: April 10, 2013, 10:25:53 PM »
The child murderess cipriano wasn't convicted on the strength of a confession alone was she  ?

I seem to remember reading the most horrific details of the little girl's finger nails being  left in the front door  (  as she had clung onto it while being dragged back into the house  )   8(8-))

Cipriano's confession was given the day before the alleged beating and in the presence of her lawyer.
'The archiving of the case was determined by the fact that public prosecutors hadn't managed to obtain sufficient evidence of the practice of crimes by the appellants.
'There is therefore a significant, and not merely a semantic difference, between the legally admissible foundations of the archive ruling.
'It doesn't therefore seem acceptable that the ruling, based on the insufficiency of evidence, should be equated to proof of innocence.'

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #19 on: April 10, 2013, 10:35:32 PM »
The child murderess cipriano wasn't convicted on the strength of a confession alone was she  ?

I seem to remember reading the most horrific details of the little girl's finger nails being  left in the front door  (  as she had clung onto it while being dragged back into the house  )   8(8-))

Cite?

cite ?  pfft



....   read the Supreme Court of Justice  case ruling

This woman is a degenerate  and the eight year old daughter she was convicted of murdering lived her short life in misery

That people are defending this monstrous woman takes my breath away ! 

debunker

  • Guest
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #20 on: April 10, 2013, 10:42:59 PM »
The child murderess cipriano wasn't convicted on the strength of a confession alone was she  ?

I seem to remember reading the most horrific details of the little girl's finger nails being  left in the front door  (  as she had clung onto it while being dragged back into the house  )   8(8-))

Cite?


cite ?  pfft



....   read the Supreme Court of Justice  case ruling



This woman is a degenerate  and the eight year old daughter she was convicted of murdering lived her short life in misery

That people are defending this monstrous woman takes my breath away !

I am not defending her, merely asking you to back up your claims.

Did the trial prove those were the girl's finger scratches, or was it a police claim. What was the quali t y of the evidence.

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #21 on: April 10, 2013, 10:48:21 PM »
The child murderess cipriano wasn't convicted on the strength of a confession alone was she  ?

I seem to remember reading the most horrific details of the little girl's finger nails being  left in the front door  (  as she had clung onto it while being dragged back into the house  )   8(8-))

Cite?


cite ?  pfft



....   read the Supreme Court of Justice  case ruling



This woman is a degenerate  and the eight year old daughter she was convicted of murdering lived her short life in misery

That people are defending this monstrous woman takes my breath away !

I am not defending her, merely asking you to back up your claims.

Did the trial prove those were the girl's finger scratches, or was it a police claim. What was the quali t y of the evidence.


Christ debunker !

Do you really want to split hairs about just how foul this piece of  **** Cipriano  is  ?

Go somewhere else for it 

debunker

  • Guest
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #22 on: April 10, 2013, 10:54:41 PM »
The child murderess cipriano wasn't convicted on the strength of a confession alone was she  ?

I seem to remember reading the most horrific details of the little girl's finger nails being  left in the front door  (  as she had clung onto it while being dragged back into the house  )   8(8-))

Cite?



cite ?  pfft




....   read the Supreme Court of Justice  case ruling





This woman is a degenerate  and the eight year old daughter she was convicted of murdering lived her short life in misery

That people are defending this monstrous woman takes my breath away !

I am not defending her, merely asking you to back up your claims.


Did the trial prove those were the girl's finger scratches, or was it a police claim. What was the quali t y of the evidence.




Christ debunker !

Do you really want to split hairs about just how foul this piece of  **** Cipriano  is  ?

Go somewhere else for it



So you admit you have no evidence to back up your doubtful contention.

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #23 on: April 10, 2013, 11:03:02 PM »
The child murderess cipriano wasn't convicted on the strength of a confession alone was she  ?

I seem to remember reading the most horrific details of the little girl's finger nails being  left in the front door  (  as she had clung onto it while being dragged back into the house  )   8(8-))

Cite?



cite ?  pfft




....   read the Supreme Court of Justice  case ruling





This woman is a degenerate  and the eight year old daughter she was convicted of murdering lived her short life in misery

That people are defending this monstrous woman takes my breath away !

I am not defending her, merely asking you to back up your claims.


Did the trial prove those were the girl's finger scratches, or was it a police claim. What was the quali t y of the evidence.




Christ debunker !

Do you really want to split hairs about just how foul this piece of  **** Cipriano  is  ?

Go somewhere else for it



So you admit you have no evidence to back up your doubtful contention.

 Anyone who chooses to get into a debate about their  'doubts'  about the Cipriano case  ...  ( the case of a little girl who was treated appallingly all her life,  until it was ended viciously at the hands of her bestial mother and uncle ) ... must be pretty twisted 

I don't choose to 

debunker

  • Guest
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #24 on: April 10, 2013, 11:12:27 PM »
What a bullshit excuse for refusing to back up his claims with a cite.

Offline sadie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7197
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #25 on: April 10, 2013, 11:17:28 PM »
Icabadcrane

You are making me very angry.  Leonor Cipriano was convicted on TORTURED OUT EVIDENCE

So called evidence TORTURED OUT OF THREE PEOPLE.   Leonor, Joao and Leandro


THAT IS NOT EVIDENCE

Thanks to Bren, Leonor Cipriano after her torture:



Not only was Leonor tortured but so allegedly were Joao and Leandro.  Unfortunately NO PHOTOGRAPHS were taken of them


This case will go down in history as one of the most cruel and unsafe verdicts ever


Are you some sort of fascist that you think torture like this acceptable, Bod?
If you want to know the real facts read :  http://madeleinemythsexposed.pbworks.com/w/page/39076140/Main%20Page

Hitler is credited with saying "Tell a big enough lie, tell it often enough, and it becomes the truth.
= "Propaganda personified."

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #26 on: April 10, 2013, 11:18:28 PM »
What a bullshit excuse for refusing to back up his claims with a cite.

This is what's bullshit

...  you defending a convicted child murderess who is a degenerate and waste of space as a human being  ...  for no other reason than it's implications on Amaral ...  and consequently the McCanns

Using  the miserable life and death of little Joana Cipriano as part of an agenda  ...  that's what's bullshit !

debunker

  • Guest
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #27 on: April 10, 2013, 11:24:28 PM »
What a bullshit excuse for refusing to back up his claims with a cite.

This is what's bullshit

...  you defending a convicted child murderess who is a degenerate and waste of space as a human being  ...  for no other reason than it's implications on Amaral ...  and consequently the McCanns

Using  the miserable life and death of little Joana Cipriano as part of an agenda  ...  that's what's bullshit !

You are a LIAR.

I have not defended her at all.

I merely asked you for a cite.

It is no wonder you are so stupid as you cannot even read simple English.

Show me where I defended her rather than questioning your unsupported claims.

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #28 on: April 10, 2013, 11:31:05 PM »
What a bullshit excuse for refusing to back up his claims with a cite.

This is what's bullshit

...  you defending a convicted child murderess who is a degenerate and waste of space as a human being  ...  for no other reason than it's implications on Amaral ...  and consequently the McCanns

Using  the miserable life and death of little Joana Cipriano as part of an agenda  ...  that's what's bullshit !

You are a LIAR.

I have not defended her at all.

I merely asked you for a cite.

It is no wonder you are so stupid as you cannot even read simple English.

Show me where I defended her rather than questioning your unsupported claims.

Calm down debunker  ...  think of your blood pressure

...  and if you are not defending Cipriano  (  and given your avowed dedication to the law and it's pronouncements )   ...  you must accept that Cipriano is guilty of murdering her eight year old daughter

You  do  accept that,  don't you  ? 

debunker

  • Guest
Re: The beating and conviction of Leonor Cipriano
« Reply #29 on: April 10, 2013, 11:35:14 PM »
What a bullshit excuse for refusing to back up his claims with a cite.

This is what's bullshit

...  you defending a convicted child murderess who is a degenerate and waste of space as a human being  ...  for no other reason than it's implications on Amaral ...  and consequently the McCanns

Using  the miserable life and death of little Joana Cipriano as part of an agenda  ...  that's what's bullshit !

You are a LIAR.

I have not defended her at all.

I merely asked you for a cite.

It is no wonder you are so stupid as you cannot even read simple English.

Show me where I defended her rather than questioning your unsupported claims.

Calm down debunker  ...  think of your blood pressure

...  and if you are not defending Cipriano  (  and given your avowed dedication to the law and it's pronouncements )   ...  you must accept that Cipriano is guilty of murdering her eight year old daughter

You  do  accept that,  don't you  ?

I accept that she has been found guilty of the offence.

I have some concerns that given current Portuguese Police Practice that we may not yet know the full story.

It took us Brits twenty years to admit that the Birmingham Six had had their confessions beaten out of them.

But you are right, her current position is that she is a criminal - as is Amaral.