Author Topic: Supervision of the Bamber Case - Telephone message COLP  (Read 2891 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1579
Supervision of the Bamber Case - Telephone message COLP
« on: March 14, 2012, 05:49:51 AM »
Supervision of the Bamber Case - COLP

Telephone message dated 10 June 1991

Weety

  • Guest
Re: Supervision of the Bamber Case - Telephone message COLP
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2012, 05:06:10 PM »
That's an interesting conversation, who is Ms Vickers?

Offline John

  • Global Moderator
  • Executive Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11862
  • Senior Editor
    • Justice 4 John Lamberton
Re: Supervision of the Bamber Case - Telephone message COLP
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2012, 05:30:34 PM »
That would be Mrs Rosemary Vickers, former Deputy Chairman of the Police Complaints Authority.  She took over from Mr Roland Moyle on 28 April 1991.


http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199495/ldhansrd/vo950308/text/50308w01.htm


Did you notice the question that Bamber sent them asking why he hadn't been released yet?
« Last Edit: March 16, 2012, 05:35:01 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. John Lamberton exposes malfeasance by public officials.
Check out my website >   http://johnlamberton.webs.com/index.htm?no_redirect=true     The truth never changes with the passage of time.

Weety

  • Guest
Re: Supervision of the Bamber Case - Telephone message COLP
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2012, 06:02:14 PM »
I did - there were a couple of bits in there that made me chuckle, like when she said "his writing is very childish, is he backward?"

Offline John

  • Global Moderator
  • Executive Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11862
  • Senior Editor
    • Justice 4 John Lamberton
Re: Supervision of the Bamber Case - Telephone message COLP
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2012, 06:43:54 PM »
I did - there were a couple of bits in there that made me chuckle, like when she said "his writing is very childish, is he backward?"

Yes I noticed that Weety, what a strange comment to make?

Was it you who asked for the pathologists reports?  Someone mentioned it earlier so I just wondered?
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. John Lamberton exposes malfeasance by public officials.
Check out my website >   http://johnlamberton.webs.com/index.htm?no_redirect=true     The truth never changes with the passage of time.

Weety

  • Guest
Re: Supervision of the Bamber Case - Telephone message COLP
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2012, 07:47:30 PM »
Yes, we were talking about what have been described as gouge marks on Sheila's arms and also whether or not the first wound to her neck would have led to her getting blood in her throat.

Offline John

  • Global Moderator
  • Executive Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11862
  • Senior Editor
    • Justice 4 John Lamberton
Re: Supervision of the Bamber Case - Telephone message COLP
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2012, 07:54:15 PM »
The pathology reports and the forensic science reports are going up this evening Weety.  I also believe the Dickinson Enquiry report has been processed and part of it is ready for upload to the server.  Busy evening admins?   8@??)(
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. John Lamberton exposes malfeasance by public officials.
Check out my website >   http://johnlamberton.webs.com/index.htm?no_redirect=true     The truth never changes with the passage of time.

Weety

  • Guest
Re: Supervision of the Bamber Case - Telephone message COLP
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2012, 08:00:27 PM »
They are doing well aren't they!

In this thread, is that Mike Tesko they're referring to? It appears that they think if it weren't for his influence JB would never have made the complaint. Makes you wonder if he wouldn't have just shut up and taken his punishment if it weren't for the encouragement.

Offline John

  • Global Moderator
  • Executive Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11862
  • Senior Editor
    • Justice 4 John Lamberton
Re: Supervision of the Bamber Case - Telephone message COLP
« Reply #8 on: March 16, 2012, 08:08:10 PM »
They are doing well aren't they!

In this thread, is that Mike Tesko they're referring to? It appears that they think if it weren't for his influence JB would never have made the complaint. Makes you wonder if he wouldn't have just shut up and taken his punishment if it weren't for the encouragement.

Yes it is Mike Teskowski.  They spell it as Tomoski and he is well know to them apparently.  He even boasted that he had shared a cell with Bamber. Isn't it interesting that they are of the opinion that it was Teskowski who started this all up and is keeping it going? 

They also seem to have met Jeremy and are well aware of his ploys?
« Last Edit: March 16, 2012, 08:13:16 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. John Lamberton exposes malfeasance by public officials.
Check out my website >   http://johnlamberton.webs.com/index.htm?no_redirect=true     The truth never changes with the passage of time.

Weety

  • Guest
Re: Supervision of the Bamber Case - Telephone message COLP
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2012, 08:13:08 PM »
Well if JB has been dragged along all these years by MT nutjobbery I almost feel sorry for him. Almost.

And yes, it's an insight into their (no longer) private opinion of both of them.

Offline John

  • Global Moderator
  • Executive Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11862
  • Senior Editor
    • Justice 4 John Lamberton
Re: Supervision of the Bamber Case - Telephone message COLP
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2012, 08:15:29 PM »
You will note Weety that the Brigadier mentioned was the previous deputy Chairman, Brigadier John Pownall OBE.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. John Lamberton exposes malfeasance by public officials.
Check out my website >   http://johnlamberton.webs.com/index.htm?no_redirect=true     The truth never changes with the passage of time.

Weety

  • Guest
Re: Supervision of the Bamber Case - Telephone message COLP
« Reply #11 on: March 16, 2012, 08:27:03 PM »
I was wondering..