Advocates for Jeremy Bamber

[puglove]

jacie has ben vey furrous toda becuas eveybode thinks her flim is pants but she cheared up a bit whn i remeynedid her tht mr invinctus is on hs way home from skiiiiiiiiiiing.she hops he has brort her a prezunt

[John]

jacie has ben vey furrous toda becuas eveybode thinks her flim is pants but she cheared up a bit whn i remeynedid her tht mr invinctus is on hs way home from skiiiiiiiiiiing.she hops he has brort her a prezunt

I'm sure Tim will be back refreshed and raring to go.  Tell Jackie not to be to disappointed about the CCRC, it had to come to an end eventually just as David predicted on the ITV programme.

[Nicholas]

Poppy Ann Miller     ....................    Profile: Psychosomatic Counsellor and Healer. Working with dreams and pre-cognition.



 
Essex UK

Justice4Jeremy-Evidence of Collusion

Much of the tainting of Jeremy Bamber’s trial was conducted around a second sound moderator (gun silencer) which was introduced by Jeremy’s relatives over a month after the crime was committed.  Instead of questioning this sudden appearance Essex Police and others chose instead, to collude with it.
Documents intended for Public Interest Immunity (PII) were ‘inadvertently’ sent to Jeremy.  PII is a principle of common law under which English courts can grant an Order allowing one litigant to keep evidence from the sight of the other litigants if they consider disclosure to be damaging to public interest.  So it is clear that the plan was for these documents to be buried, safely out-of-sight, intended never to see the light-of-day

Jeremy’s most recent eight page letter to me provides an in-depth account of what he has found within these documents.  Jeremy’s letters are handwritten.  He writes in detail including reference and exhibit numbers revealing proof of what he has always maintained – his innocence.  Details of documents which evidence beyond dispute the existence of two sound moderators and the ‘losing’, editing and re-writing of crucial evidence.  Jeremy has given me permission to reveal his entire letter and the corruption of documents which he has discovered.  I shall not record it all here though will forward relevant information to the City of London Police (COLP), the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) and the Home Secretary.

For those of us who believe that the administrators of justice in our so-called Great Britain, would not comprehend such malpractice and deceit, Jeremy states on more than one occasion, ‘I have the documents to prove it’.

The following are direct quotes from Jeremy’s letter and for brevity I have paraphrased others.

‘COLP (City of London Police) discovered that Glynis Howard and her assistant Leslie Tucker; John Hayward and his assistant, Andrew Palmer; Brian Elliott and his assistant, Louise Float and Malcolm Fletcher all signed a set of falsified documents for a second sound moderator to create a chain of evidence paper trail capable of deceiving the jury and it did.......I have their lab notes.’
‘They(sound moderators) are both the same, Parker-Hale MM1 type and someone simply took SBJ/1 out of its cardboard tube packaging and slipped in DB/1 that had been contaminated with red paint from the scene.
‘And in any event they admitted this to COLP in 1991 but COLP and Essex Police just covered it up under PII.  John Hayward took photos of SBJ/1 on 12th Sept ’85, well him and his assistant Andrew Palmer, COLP showed these photos to Brian Elliott in 1991 and asked, “Is that the same sound moderator you examined?” 

Elliott replied indicating that he did not accept it could be the same one and provides an explanation as to why that is the case, including a description of how the sound moderator he examined differed from the one in the photo in relation to the positioning of red paint on it.

‘Everyone examined the sound moderator under a  microscope as well as by eye and it’s clear that the first one SBJ/1 had blood on it and this smear of red paint and the second one DB/1 was switched with SBJ/1 after being sent to the lab on 20/Sept/85.’
‘I can prove every word of the above – I have all the PII primary documents showing exactly how my relatives and Essex Police and the forensic scientists at Huntingdon and COLP and PCA (now the IPCC) all worked together to either directly corrupt the sound moderator evidence or actively assisted in concealing that Essex Police found SBJ/1 and it was switched between 20th and 25th Sept ’85 at Huntingdon Forensic Laboratory with DB/1 that had been used to scratch and score the kitchen mantle shelf at White House Farm to falsely implicate me as a murderer. ....I have the documents showing that it was.......These are the document references: Exhibit signed by Glynis Howard, Malcolm Fletched, John Hayward and Brian Elliott:- ‘Police Crime Number’ SC/786/85, ‘Description of Article ‘Silencer’ DB/1, crossed out, and DRB/1 in brackets:- Serial Number 22, as the identification marker.’

Jeremy has no doubt that lawyers, judiciary as well as the Home Office must have known about this; and what about the media?  Considering the damage much of the press did in promulgating biased views, influencing public opinion through their coverage of Jeremy’s case, I wonder if they will attempt to compensate in some small way by publishing this evidence?  The truth!  Though I appreciate it might be difficult for them to recognise the truth 'even if it jumped up and bit them in the face!'.
I feel it reprehensible that those to whom we look for justice would rather lie and deceive than admit they were wrong.  That those who set themselves up in public office as upholders of the 'Law', can collude to send an innocent man to prison and then leave him there for TWENTY FIVE YEARS rather than face up to their own shortcomings.
It doesn’t bear thinking about and maybe some people would rather not think about the enormity of the true crime here.  Heartbreaking.
I do not believe there is a Heaven for the just and a Hell for the unjust but for one brief moment there I wished there were!


Posted by Poppy Ann Miller on twitter 8 October 2011

http://poppymeze.blogspot.com/2011/10/justice4jeremy-evidence-of-collusion.html

I ask the question,  "What does Poppy Miller know of Jeremy Bamber's trial."


The answer to this is zilch.   Poppy Miller did not attend the trial and relies on information provided by Jeremy Bamber and Jackie Preece to name but two.  If Poppy Miller wants to be taken seriously I believe she should seek out original documents and in particular the transcript of the trial.  Oh I forgot, it has mysteriously disappeared from the Bamber Camp.

If Poppy Miller wishes to be a mouthpiece for Jeremy Bamber so be it but do us all a favour and say so.  Please don't make out that any of the above post is original thinking because it just won't wash Polly.

If you wish to go public so be it but be warned they are making a mug out of you too!

Caroline has re highlighted the ‘serial numbers’ on blue here http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10067.msg462756.html#msg462756

[Nicholas]

Caroline has re highlighted the ‘serial numbers’ on blue here http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10067.msg462756.html#msg462756

NGB made a post recently on the Bamber forum regarding JM and the possibility of her having been arrested?

There’s no evidence to suggest she was* but in the Simon Hall case, it didn’t become clear to me that Jamie Barker had also been arrested and questioned under caution by Suffolk police and considered a possible suspect until around the time of the Zenith burglary discovery in 2012/13. It was following this that I recognised Simon Hall and all his previous legal representatives had never requested full disclosure on this fact - either pre-trial nor in the years that followed.

*Someone would have surely got wind of JM having been arrested, one of her friends around the time for example, and spilled the beans before now?

I found it interesting when NGB raised this on the Bamber board and wondered how long he’d considered this to be a possibility?

[APRIL]

NGB made a post recently on the Bamber forum regarding JM and the possibility of her having been arrested?

There’s no evidence to suggest she was* but in the Simon Hall case, it didn’t become clear to me that Jamie Barker had also been arrested and questioned under caution by Suffolk police and considered a possible suspect until around the time of the Zenith burglary discovery in 2012/13. It was following this that I recognised Simon Hall and all his previous legal representatives had never requested full disclosure on this fact - either pre-trial nor in the years that followed.

*Someone would have surely got wind of JM having been arrested, one of her friends around the time for example, and spilled the beans before now?

I found it interesting when NGB raised this on the Bamber board and wondered how long he’d considered this to be a possibility?

I find it strange -might it be telling?- that although I live only a stone's throw from where he lived after leaving Greshams, and am surrounded by friends and acquaintances of his parents, who were well liked, there is no one in the 55/60 age group who has stood up in his defence. He was at college locally and had numerous jobs in restaurants/bars. Many must have known him. In an area where everyone knows everyone, it's surprising that there's little -no- local support. Or is it? Maybe silence speaks louder than words?

[Nicholas]

I find it strange -might it be telling?- that although I live only a stone's throw from where he lived after leaving Greshams, and am surrounded by friends and acquaintances of his parents, who were well liked, there is no one in the 55/60 age group who has stood up in his defence. He was at college locally and had numerous jobs in restaurants/bars. Many must have known him. In an area where everyone knows everyone, it's surprising that there's little -no- local support. Or is it? Maybe silence speaks louder than words?

Jeremy Bambers criminal deception knows no bounds, as is evidenced these past 3 decades plus.

”Our study is producing evidence that Innocence fraud is real”
Excerpts:
“A stern warning was issued to crime laboratory administrators that some post-conviction exonerations may have been secured by innocence activists using malicious tactics, or 'innocence fraud', creating potential public safety threats as convicted felons are released from prison.

“In the mean time, Collins hopes that The Innocence Audit will open people's eyes to what goes on behind the scenes when activists are fighting to secure exonerations. "Our study is producing evidence that Innocence Fraud is real," Collins says. "But it can be corrected with education and better standards of care for post-conviction activists and litigators. The ends cannot justify the means when the means are fraudulent."
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2015/05/prweb12701214.htm

Why didn’t Bamber ever make public the documents outlining the reasons for the Criminal Cases Review Commission  previous refusals?

[Nicholas]

NGB made a post recently on the Bamber forum regarding JM and the possibility of her having been arrested?

There’s no evidence to suggest she was* but in the Simon Hall case, it didn’t become clear to me that Jamie Barker had also been arrested and questioned under caution by Suffolk police and considered a possible suspect until around the time of the Zenith burglary discovery in 2012/13. It was following this that I recognised Simon Hall and all his previous legal representatives had never requested full disclosure on this fact - either pre-trial nor in the years that followed.

*Someone would have surely got wind of JM having been arrested, one of her friends around the time for example, and spilled the beans before now?

I found it interesting when NGB raised this on the Bamber board and wondered how long he’d considered this to be a possibility?

From the archives:

No substance' to Bamber case claims, says QC

“Serious allegations of impropriety, dishonesty and conspiracy against police involved in the Jeremy Bamber case had "no substance whatever" to back them up, the Court of Appeal heard today.
Victor Temple QC, for the Crown, told three judges hearing Bamber's appeal against conviction for the murders of five members of his adoptive family, that once the court looked closely at the allegations "the entire edifice crumbles to nothing".

Bamber, now 41, who is serving life for the murders at White House Farm, Tolleshunt D'Arcy, Essex, in August 1985, is urging the judges to overturn his convictions as "unsafe".

He claims that the case against him was built on a series of "deceits" by police and that certain evidence was withheld in order to unfairly bolster the prosecution case.

Mr Temple, rejecting the allegations on the 11th day of the hearing before Lord Justice Kay, Mr Justice Wright and Mr Justice Henriques in London, said that Bamber's counsel, Michael Turner QC "was seeking to swim in an empty sea".

He said that Mr Turner was seeking to base "very serious allegations of impropriety, dishonesty and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice" on no more than slack paperwork, double hearsay and strained constructions on documentary evidence.

Mr Temple added: "There is no substance whatever to back these allegations up."

Bamber, who is present in the dock for the hearing, regularly passed notes to his legal team.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-145437/No-substance-Bamber-case-claims-says-QC.html

[Nicholas]

NGB made a post recently on the Bamber forum regarding JM and the possibility of her having been arrested?

There’s no evidence to suggest she was* but in the Simon Hall case, it didn’t become clear to me that Jamie Barker had also been arrested and questioned under caution by Suffolk police and considered a possible suspect until around the time of the Zenith burglary discovery in 2012/13. It was following this that I recognised Simon Hall and all his previous legal representatives had never requested full disclosure on this fact - either pre-trial nor in the years that followed.

*Someone would have surely got wind of JM having been arrested, one of her friends around the time for example, and spilled the beans before now?

I found it interesting when NGB raised this on the Bamber board and wondered how long he’d considered this to be a possibility?

Plus (Courtesy of Steve UK here http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,6961.msg326255.html#msg326255 )

“At the committal proceedings last October counsel said he had exerted a “powerful influence” over his former girlfriend, which prevented her from coming forward to testify against him until long after the killings, even though he had told her in detail how he had carried them out. He told her how he had entered the farmhouse and the positions in which he had  left each of the bodies.”
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2507&dat=19861029&id=HoJDAAAAIBAJ&sjid=q6UMAAAAIBAJ&pg=1812,7290130&hl=en

[Nicholas]

Plus (Courtesy of Steve UK here http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,6961.msg326255.html#msg326255 )

“At the committal proceedings last October counsel said he had exerted a “powerful influence” over his former girlfriend, which prevented her from coming forward to testify against him until long after the killings, even though he had told her in detail how he had carried them out. He told her how he had entered the farmhouse and the positions in which he had  left each of the bodies.”
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2507&dat=19861029&id=HoJDAAAAIBAJ&sjid=q6UMAAAAIBAJ&pg=1812,7290130&hl=en

Bamber still exerts a ‘powerful influence’ over his ‘supporters’ today

PLorna Lake
@LadyLornaLake
Jan 17
Replying to
@KkeithG
Crispy was put to sleep on the vet's advice.  It was not Jeremy Bamber's decision though, in law, he had to give his consent.
https://mobile.twitter.com/LadyLornaLake/status/1218171377133457410

How did the vet become involved by the 8th August 1985?

[Nicholas]

Plus (Courtesy of Steve UK here http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,6961.msg326255.html#msg326255 )

“At the committal proceedings last October counsel said he had exerted a “powerful influence” over his former girlfriend, which prevented her from coming forward to testify against him until long after the killings, even though he had told her in detail how he had carried them out. He told her how he had entered the farmhouse and the positions in which he had  left each of the bodies.”
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2507&dat=19861029&id=HoJDAAAAIBAJ&sjid=q6UMAAAAIBAJ&pg=1812,7290130&hl=en

‘Miss Mugford was closely questioned in the witness box. She told the jury that Bamber believed he should have been an actor, because he could “convince anyone of anything”

[Myster]

Bamber still exerts a ‘powerful influence’ over his ‘supporters’ today

PLorna Lake
@LadyLornaLake
Jan 17
Replying to
@KkeithG
Crispy was put to sleep on the vet's advice.  It was not Jeremy Bamber's decision though, in law, he had to give his consent.
https://mobile.twitter.com/LadyLornaLake/status/1218171377133457410

How did the vet become involved by the 8th August 1985?

No-one else in the family wanted Crispy, neither did he because it would damage his stereo equipment, so the vet was summoned to the cottage on the 8th to euthanise it.

[Nicholas]

No-one else in the family wanted Crispy, neither did he because it would damage his stereo equipment, so the vet was summoned to the cottage on the 8th to euthanise it.

‘Summoned’ by who?

PLorna Lake
Crispy was put to sleep on the vet's advice.  It was not Jeremy Bamber's decision though, in law, he had to give his consent

[Nicholas]

Bamber still exerts a ‘powerful influence’ over his ‘supporters’ today

PLorna Lake
@LadyLornaLake
Jan 17
Replying to
@KkeithG
Crispy was put to sleep on the vet's advice.  It was not Jeremy Bamber's decision though, in law, he had to give his consent.
https://mobile.twitter.com/LadyLornaLake/status/1218171377133457410

Total denial shown by PLorna Lake

[Myster]

‘Summoned’ by who?

Might be documented somewhere, but I can't find it at the mo.

[Nicholas]

Might be documented somewhere, but I can't find it at the mo.

Courtesy of Caroline here http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10110.msg472745.html#msg472745

Taken from the WS of vet Robert McTaggart Hill:

"On my arrival Mr Jeremy Bamber told me that he wished me to put down the Shih Tzu dog that had belonged to Mrs Bamber, his mother. He said that the dog was very attached to his mother, and since her death, he thought that the dog should not go to another home." . He also said that the dog had turned a bit nasty since the killings at WHF and it was a bit snappy.