Author Topic: Corinne and Luke Mitchell pass lie detector tests - video  (Read 12551 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online John

Re: Corinne and Luke Mitchell pass lie detector tests - video
« Reply #15 on: June 30, 2012, 09:33:41 PM »
Is Dr Lean credible? What is she qualified in?

She is a qualified paralegal and studied Psychology and Sociology to Honours Degree level.   She recently gained a Phd.  (A Paralegal is a paraprofessional who assists qualified lawyers in their legal work.)

Is she credible?    Well NO!  imo   8(0(*


Wasn't she the one behind the Adrian Prout lie detector fiasco which went horribly wrong and more recently the ones which Luke Mitchell and his mother took?


Yes Milly.  That is perfectly correct.  Sandra Lean is trying to get Luke Mitchell freed on the basis of junk science.  I wonder how that will go down with the Professors at Napier in Edinburgh or Stirling University.

Desperation seems to be the keyword!
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. John Lamberton exposes malfeasance by public officials.
Check out my website >   http://johnlamberton.webs.com/index.htm?no_redirect=true     The truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline kevin

Re: Corinne and Luke Mitchell pass lie detector tests - video
« Reply #16 on: July 01, 2012, 08:59:46 PM »
So she hasn't 'won' or succesfully helped anyone then?
Adrian Prout had guilty written all over him, even Zippy (my little cat) knew that!  @)(++(*

you've sure got one crazy intelligent cat there Joanne

you should call him Inspector Zippy   8(0(*

Online John

Re: Corinne and Luke Mitchell pass lie detector tests - video
« Reply #17 on: July 01, 2012, 09:01:45 PM »
So she hasn't 'won' or succesfully helped anyone then?
Adrian Prout had guilty written all over him, even Zippy (my little cat) knew that!  @)(++(*

you've sure got one crazy intelligent cat there Joanne

you should call him Inspector Zippy   8(0(*

Dr Zippy would be better!!   After all, Dr Sandra hasn't a cat in hells chance of getting Luke Mitchell off on the basis of a lie detector test.   @)(++(*
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. John Lamberton exposes malfeasance by public officials.
Check out my website >   http://johnlamberton.webs.com/index.htm?no_redirect=true     The truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline sika

Re: Corinne and Luke Mitchell pass lie detector tests - video
« Reply #18 on: July 10, 2012, 12:27:20 PM »
Middleton and Lean have spent years blaming just about every male associated with the Jones extended family.  Each and every one of them has had their personal lives laid bare on the WAP forum in an attempt to deflect blame from Luke Mitchell.  Such conduct is totally unacceptable and Dr Lean wonders why she gets accosted in the local supermarket or cannot even enter the neighbourhood Post Office?  In the absence of any evidence that Luke Mitchell is innocent since basically there is none, we are left with the conviction and the circumstantial evidence that exists.

Luke Mitchell had a history of inappropriate behaviour with the knife he carried.  Just days before he slaughtered Jodi Jones he threatened another girl at knife point and put this girl in fear of her life, one begins to wonder was this the prelude to what happened to Jodi?  It is also fact that Mitchell was addicted to Cannabis and sold it openly to other children everywhere he went.  His bedroom was kitted out with the requisite implements for packaging cannabis for resale. Bearing in mind that Mitchell was only 14 years old at this time one has to wonder what parental controlexisted in the Mitchell household?


John, are you able to provide any more detail about the knife incident involving Mitchell, which happened days before the murder?

Online John

Re: Corinne and Luke Mitchell pass lie detector tests - video
« Reply #19 on: July 10, 2012, 01:36:49 PM »
Middleton and Lean have spent years blaming just about every male associated with the Jones extended family.  Each and every one of them has had their personal lives laid bare on the WAP forum in an attempt to deflect blame from Luke Mitchell.  Such conduct is totally unacceptable and Dr Lean wonders why she gets accosted in the local supermarket or cannot even enter the neighbourhood Post Office?  In the absence of any evidence that Luke Mitchell is innocent since basically there is none, we are left with the conviction and the circumstantial evidence that exists.

Luke Mitchell had a history of inappropriate behaviour with the knife he carried.  Just days before he slaughtered Jodi Jones he threatened another girl at knife point and put this girl in fear of her life, one begins to wonder was this the prelude to what happened to Jodi?  It is also fact that Mitchell was addicted to Cannabis and sold it openly to other children everywhere he went.  His bedroom was kitted out with the requisite implements for packaging cannabis for resale. Bearing in mind that Mitchell was only 14 years old at this time one has to wonder what parental controlexisted in the Mitchell household?


John, are you able to provide any more detail about the knife incident involving Mitchell, which happened days before the murder?

Absolutely Sika.  I will post the entire story with links when I get back to the office.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. John Lamberton exposes malfeasance by public officials.
Check out my website >   http://johnlamberton.webs.com/index.htm?no_redirect=true     The truth never changes with the passage of time.