When you're acting defensive in a situation like that it is always suspicious. Anyone who has lost a child would ask and accept anyone's help to find her. But the third man intervened. Why? These 3 have never been properly investigated - SY sort your head out! They contradict each other so much that it can't be truth. An experienced (25 years) child protection officer trying to help when the father said that a paedo gang had taken her. But they don't want her help - acting DEFENSIVE just like the dog alerts >@@(*&)
What makes you think 'these 3'' have never been properly investigated? That's a preposterous suggestion IMO.
IIRC Yvonne Martin was a stranger off the street who turned up and even though she could see how distraught Kate was - started bombarding her with intrusive questions. When she was asked to leave she strongly resisted and eventually they had to insist that she left. She then went off to Reception to ask more questions. IMO she was more of a busybody than anything else.
It seems to me her ego was dented - hence the anonymous letter re David Payne, who was the person who asked her to leave.
The only contribution she has made to the case IMO - is that she confirmed what a dreadful state Kate was in that morning (crying intensely) - even asking if a doctor had seen her - which directly contradicts the claims made by some sceptics that Kate and Gerry blythely went off for a jog along the beach that morning - as if nothing serious had happened.
What has YM contributed apart from that?? Well - she said that she thought she remembered David Payne's face from somewhere. To date she has not remembered from where. And that's it.
I've got no time for people who send anonymous letters - that's not how professonal people behave IMO.