That letter was pertaining to his affair with the girl when she was over the age of consent. He did not admit to abusing her when she was underage.
What I think of him as a person is not the issue. The evidence was not conclusive as far as I can see. So there is a reasonable doubt in my mind.
And what is happening with Cliff Richard is sickening almost beyond belief. Why don't they just declare him Guilty? Why bother with a Trial?
Well of course he would deny it was underage! For a 50 something to be involved with teenaged girls is just wrong ... obviously the court believed it did start when she was underage and I have no reason to suspect the court got it wrong!
Especially as he has been convicted of 12 assaults on four different girls!
Rolf's a wrong 'un!
As for Cliff ... we shall have to see!
I do think the law has to change though; anonymity for the accusers when the accused has their life ruined , guilty or not, is just unfair!