Another conundrum. This time one which you guys have probably gone over many times: the phone calls. What is the likeliest sequence? This is where I am, based on Ann Eaton mostly.
3.00 a.m. call from WHF to Bamber's place - this is Bamber's estimated time. It's likely to be reasonably accurate because he thought BT could establish these times.
3.02 or 3.15 Bamber to Julie. The first time is Sue Battersby's adjusted clock and the second is what Julie said on 07 Aug after calling her flatmate to verify (after saying 3.30).
3.26 - 3.37 Bamber to PC West. Start time from PC West and end time a combo of Bamber saying it took them 11 minutes to do anything and Bonnet's 3.36 despatch time.
Time for Bamber to get through to Chelmsford after wasting time calling Witham, looking up no. etc - '10 minutes at the outside' according to his statement to police (given in September when he was in the frame).
The sequence above is the wrong way round. He claimed he called the police before Julie, but that would mean (assuming police times are correct) he called Julie after 3.36 which is way after his flatmates' times. In his story, also, 26 minutes passed between the WHF call and his call to the police. This was his problem and why he maybe planned to use a hitman before ditching the idea. How to react fast enough to Nevill's call given that he had to pedal like crazy to get home. I figure he made the phone call last, jumped on the bike, cycled home like Wiggo, called Julie (who was to make sure her flatmates registered the call) then pretended to spend 10 minutes looking up the cops' phone number.
Again, nobody questioned this account, except Ann of course.