When people post false claims and lies I call them on it. When people make allegations I challenge them to prove their claims because the burden of proof rests with the proponent. At the end of the day you grossly distort every aspect of the ballistic issues in this case. You take a broad conceptual claim made by someone not addressing this specific case and then distort claiming that it disproves specific science that applies to this case.
Jeremy's lawyers already raised nonsense of the sort that was rejected but you go further and make up nonsense they didn't even try because they had no scientists willing to spout such tripe. If you can't stand the heat of having your nonsense challenged then don' go into the kitchen...
And you conveniently forget SIZE
The bullets used at WHF .22 are the least likely to cause draw-back aka blow-back, high impact back spatter and an abundance of GSR. Look at the size compared with a range of other ammo. I'm not an expert but I know enough to highlight your cranky ill informed theories. It's a hugely complex subject involving different branches of science. Bullet size is a determining factor; anatomical location another; anything that might impede flight of blood such as hair and clothes; surrounding objects such as floors, ceilings and furniture; angle and distance of shot. It is way beyond the likes of us and Malcolm Fletcher a general scientific officer.
If JB was the perp and fired 25 shots, with the last two fired at SC, said to be contact or near contact, and staged a sucide with the rifle remaining on her body and her hand resting against it then why wasn't any GSR found on her hand and nightie, if as you claim an abundance of GSR is discharged with every shot and remains for several hours after discharge and doesn't transfer with movement? You would have us believe a .22 is akin to a cannon being fired!