Author Topic: Multiple reasons why Sheila Caffell is innocent and Jeremy Bamber is guilty  (Read 85861 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline abs

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 540
Oh look...9 out of 11 of those apply to JB too...the only two that don't apply are that he wasn't on cannabis and he wasn't on schizophrenic medication!

Actually cannabis taken with Haloperidol can be a trigger for psychosis.

Offline John

  • Global Moderator
  • Executive Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11862
  • Senior Editor
    • Justice 4 John Lamberton
Evidence of Sheila's innocence...

Readers should note:  It was stated at Jeremy Bamber's trial that as a consequence of what occurred on the morning of the murders and following Jeremy Bamber's own evidence, an innocent Sheila renders Jeremy Bamber guilty by default.  It does not mean that he carried out the murders alone however.


1. Uncontaminated hands and nightdress completely free of any gunfire residue or gun oil.  In fact no contaminants of any sort indicated that Sheila never handled the rifle let alone fired it 25 times in quick succession and reloaded its magazine at least twice.

2. Uncontaminated feet.  Sheila's feet were completely clean and free of blood or any other contaminants evidencing the fact that she had been in bed when the attack took place and thereafter only walked on carpet. She could never have been downstairs in the kitchen that morning.

3. Uncut feet. Nevill Bamber was brutally attacked in the kitchen after having been shot several times in the upstairs bedroom.  During the assault in the kitchen a glass lampshade was smashed leaving glass fragments all over the floor. Had Sheila taken part in that attack the soles of her feet or the soles of her slippers would have been pock marked with glass fragments.  Sheila's feet were unmarked as were the soles of her slippers.

4. Only one fingerprint on the rifle evidencing the fact that Sheila did not wield it or fire it.  Had she shot herself twice as alleged by some her thumbprint would have been on the trigger since she would have to had pushed it.  It wasn't.

5. It is almost certain that blood and DNA belonging to Sheila was found in the sound moderator.  Group 'A' human blood matching Sheila was recovered from the sound moderator in 1985.  Later, advances in forensic science methods led to the recovery of DNA from inside the sound moderator which returned 17 markers out of 20 as a match to Sheila which was substantially better than the maximum coincidence rate of thirteen.  Sheila could not have shot herself with the sound moderator attached nor could she have returned it to the gun cupboard after shooting herself twice in the throat.

6. Sheila was in good spirits, looking forward to the future as a family again. Her doctor and her ex husband stated that she was not capable of hurting her father or her children.

7. Two gunshots to her neck.  Hardly indicative of a suicide especially when the first one would have incapacitated her. It is also noticeable that the gun and magazine were empty when found. Was that another coincidence that Sheila just happened to use the last bullet and had no others on her person?

8. No marks or injuries following a fight.  Sheila was tiny compared to the 6' 2" Nevill.  She could not have fought with him without sustaining some sort of injury or damage to her clothing.

9. Sheila had traces of cannabis in her system rendering her calm and docile, not violent or murderous.

10. Sheila had run out of her procyclidine which counteracts the effects of her medication haloperidol. Without this she would have been very shaky and uncoordinated (as described by various witnesses) and would not have had the control needed to get off 25 shots without missing one never mind trying to reload an awkward magazine in between time.

11. Sheila was unfamiliar with the rifle or any firearm for that matter and would have been unable to make 25 target shots.

12. If Sheila had shot herself in the throat and had remained conscious, there would have been blood in her mouth and throat with resultant blood spatter everywhere as she struggled to breathe. Her fingers would have touched the burning wound and ended up covered in blood as would have her face and neck.  The blood trails running from this wound would have been smudged yet it was not. There was no secondary blood staining to her face or neck when the police initially found her.  The inside of her hands and her finger tips did not have any blood staining.  Sheila therefore was not conscious after the first shot and most certainly did not fire the second one.

13. Sheila's body was found on the far side of the master bedroom away from everyone. Had she committed suicide as some allege it is more than likely that she would have done so beside her children and not remote from them.

14. Perfectly manicured nails and all intact and unbroken.  If Sheila had used the rifle and loaded it at least once she would have ended up with some nail damage.  There was none.


Please post any suggestions for additions as you think fit.
« Last Edit: May 31, 2012, 10:11:27 AM by Admin »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. John Lamberton exposes malfeasance by public officials.
Check out my website >   http://johnlamberton.webs.com/index.htm?no_redirect=true     The truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline abs

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 540
It would have been nigh impossible for her to shoot herself in virtually the same spot with an accidental shot.

Perhaps this could be added to the misnomer list, then. The images of Sheila prove that she never regained consciousness after the first shot?

I was just thinking the same thing Shona.  The fact that she had no blood on her hands just shows that she never touched the bleeding wound after the first shot as would have been a normal reaction.  I will get admin to draft another one up in the morning, he likes his early nights just now as his wife is back from Africa.

I am not buying that. Those photos indicate that Sheila did indeed have her hand on the first wound (which, by the way, collide with my claim that she shot herself in quick succession). Take a good look.

P.S. The pictures are very unclear here - how come?
« Last Edit: March 11, 2012, 01:48:19 PM by Admin »

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1579
Excellent work everyone and now we have 13 reasons and growing.  You should take up criminology as a career Shona you're so good at this.

We must promote these reasons over Twitter so just watch those ratings soar.   ?>)()<

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1579

I am not buying that. Those photos indicate that Sheila did indeed have her hand on the first wound (which, by the way, collide with my claim that she shot herself in quick succession). Take a good look.

P.S. The pictures are very unclear here - how come?


How exactly do they show such a thing abs.  Where is all the blood on her fingers?






and mores to the point where are the bloodied finger marks on her neck?  THERE AREN'T ANY proving that Sheila was unconscious or unable to move when she was shot for the second time by her murderer.

Specifically note the totally clean left hand and the absence of any blood on the top of her nightie where her hand is resting!

« Last Edit: March 11, 2012, 01:48:30 PM by Admin »

Offline abs

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 540
There seems to be some smearing on the upper wound (which does not quite make sense.)

But there are smearmarks on Sheila´s nightgown, clearly made by fingers, most likely her fingers. There are streams of dried blood on her lower arm, consistant with her having held her arm/hand up to her neck. (I have seen this happen in front of my eyes recently. My husband had a sudden nosebleed, and he quickly moved his hand up to his face. Blood ran down his forearm, and I was amazed to see that the pattern was pretty much exactly like the streams you see on Sheila´s arm. The blood dried very quickly, and it "stopped" on the arm as you see in the photo.)
There is also the large, triangular bloodstain in Sheila´s armpit-area, which indicates that she had her hand up. How did it get there if she hadn´t - and how did the fingermark-smear on the nightgown get there - and the streams of blood on her lower arm? How?
« Last Edit: March 11, 2012, 01:48:43 PM by Admin »

Offline Admin

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1579
There seems to be some smearing on the upper wound (which does not quite make sense.)

But there are smearmarks on Sheila´s nightgown, clearly made by fingers, most likely her fingers. There are streams of dried blood on her lower arm, consistant with her having held her arm/hand up to her neck. (I have seen this happen in front of my eyes recently. My husband had a sudden nosebleed, and he quickly moved his hand up to his face. Blood ran down his forearm, and I was amazed to see that the pattern was pretty much exactly like the streams you see on Sheila´s arm. The blood dried very quickly, and it "stopped" on the arm as you see in the photo.)
There is also the large, triangular bloodstain in Sheila´s armpit-area, which indicates that she had her hand up. How did it get there if she hadn´t - and how did the fingermark-smear on the nightgown get there - and the streams of blood on her lower arm? How?


The upper wound smearing was caused by her head being lifted forward thus creating a mirror image of the bullet hole and the existing smear.

It is noticeable that there is less of a mirror image with the lower wound.




« Last Edit: March 16, 2015, 01:02:55 AM by John »

Offline abs

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 540


Sorry, I cannot see that at all. In your scenario, the blood runs uphill on her lower arm! I have seen this happen, as I said. Arm/hand up, and this was the pattern. I should have taken a photo.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2012, 10:04:27 PM by John »

Offline abs

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 540
I have to disagree, sorry!

Weety

  • Guest
I think the dark 'blobs' at the end of each blood run are where it ran to, not from, so I agree with abs. Not sure where that gets us though!

lucy70

  • Guest
There seems to be some smearing on the upper wound (which does not quite make sense.)

But there are smearmarks on Sheila´s nightgown, clearly made by fingers, most likely her fingers. There are streams of dried blood on her lower arm, consistant with her having held her arm/hand up to her neck. (I have seen this happen in front of my eyes recently. My husband had a sudden nosebleed, and he quickly moved his hand up to his face. Blood ran down his forearm, and I was amazed to see that the pattern was pretty much exactly like the streams you see on Sheila´s arm. The blood dried very quickly, and it "stopped" on the arm as you see in the photo.)
There is also the large, triangular bloodstain in Sheila´s armpit-area, which indicates that she had her hand up. How did it get there if she hadn´t - and how did the fingermark-smear on the nightgown get there - and the streams of blood on her lower arm? How?




I agree with you Abs and think the prosecution did too.
Think that after the first shot Sheila was stunned and put her hand up to the wound (a natural reaction) which caused the blood streams on her arms.
Have to say though that after she did this she was shot again when JB realised she wasn't dead from the first shot and 'staged' afterwards to the position we see her in now.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2012, 10:06:09 PM by John »

Offline abs

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 540
I think the dark 'blobs' at the end of each blood run are where it ran to, not from, so I agree with abs. Not sure where that gets us though!

That is exactly what I mean. The blood dries very quickly (surprisingly so), and is arrested and the blood that follows, stops there as well because of a tiny "wall" of dried blood, hence the darker "droplet" at the end (there is more blood there.) Hard to explain, sorry!

Weety

  • Guest
My explanation is a little less technical - watch rain drops on a window - the 'blob' is always at the front.

Offline abs

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 540
My explanation is a little less technical - watch rain drops on a window - the 'blob' is always at the front.

Well, actually that is a good way to explain it.

Offline John

  • Global Moderator
  • Executive Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11862
  • Senior Editor
    • Justice 4 John Lamberton
For someone who was supposed to have wielded a rifle after she had shot herself in the throat there is remarkably little blood on the rifle itself.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. John Lamberton exposes malfeasance by public officials.
Check out my website >   http://johnlamberton.webs.com/index.htm?no_redirect=true     The truth never changes with the passage of time.