Author Topic: Maddie McCann breakthrough: Cops 'given cash to probe new trafficking gang lead'  (Read 3096 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sadie

« Last Edit: December 07, 2016, 12:01:00 PM by Angelo222 »
If you want to know the real facts read :  http://madeleinemythsexposed.pbworks.com/w/page/39076140/Main%20Page

Hitler is credited with saying "Tell a big enough lie, tell it often enough, and it becomes the truth.
= "Propaganda personified."

Offline ShiningInLuz

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/567443/madeleine-mccann-search-new-lead-found-trafficking-gang


http://metro.co.uk/2016/12/04/important-madeleine-mccann-lead-sees-police-given-money-to-investigate-6300411/


Seems like they are looking at my theory ?
Soz, am too busy to comment atm but will come in when I can

Several other reports in 'Newsnow Mccann'
Is this actually news or is it junk news? 

OG was given funding to last to April 2017 in Oct or Nov 2016 in what seemed to be the normal 6-monthly funding process.  If the main source of this 'breakthrough' is the Daily Star I would be very wary of its provenance.

Does anyone know what the track record of the reporter or the Star is wrt to the MBM case?
I'm moving to Portelas!


Offline stephen25000

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/567443/madeleine-mccann-search-new-lead-found-trafficking-gang


http://metro.co.uk/2016/12/04/important-madeleine-mccann-lead-sees-police-given-money-to-investigate-6300411/


Seems like they are looking at my theory ?
Soz, am too busy to comment atm but will come in when I can

Several other reports in 'Newsnow Mccann'

..or they are printing another Mitchell release prior to the Supreme Court decision...
The McCanns were solely responsible for their childcare arrangements and there is no one else to blame.

S and S, two more amateurs making money from a disappeared child, and clearly without a clue.

Offline stephen25000

So where is their an actual OG or Whitehall source ? 8(*(
The McCanns were solely responsible for their childcare arrangements and there is no one else to blame.

S and S, two more amateurs making money from a disappeared child, and clearly without a clue.

Offline Faithlilly

So where is their an actual OG or Whitehall source ? 8(*(

Of course not.
Moral Guilt
Detractors of the work of our British Police in bringing criminals to justice generally ignore the important distinction between moral proof and legal evidence of guilt. In not a few cases that are popularly classed with 'unsolved mysteries of crime,' the offender is known, but evidence is wanting. If, for example, in- a recent murder case of special notoriety and interest,* certain human remains had not been found in a cellar, a great crime would have been catalogued among `Police failures'; and yet, even without the evidence which sent themurderer to the gallows, the moral proof of his guilt would have been full and clear.
Robert Anderson

Offline ferryman

Is this actually news or is it junk news? 

OG was given funding to last to April 2017 in Oct or Nov 2016 in what seemed to be the normal 6-monthly funding process.  If the main source of this 'breakthrough' is the Daily Star I would be very wary of its provenance.

Does anyone know what the track record of the reporter or the Star is wrt to the MBM case?

There was no flesh put on the earlier reports about what leads they were pursuing, though.
Why is Victoria Derbybshire persona non grata on this board?

Offline Faithlilly

There was no flesh put on the earlier reports about what leads they were pursuing, though.

So what do you think the traffickers, knowing OG was hot on their heels, would do with Madeleine?
Do you really think experienced police officers would endanger a child by leaking this kind of information ?
Moral Guilt
Detractors of the work of our British Police in bringing criminals to justice generally ignore the important distinction between moral proof and legal evidence of guilt. In not a few cases that are popularly classed with 'unsolved mysteries of crime,' the offender is known, but evidence is wanting. If, for example, in- a recent murder case of special notoriety and interest,* certain human remains had not been found in a cellar, a great crime would have been catalogued among `Police failures'; and yet, even without the evidence which sent themurderer to the gallows, the moral proof of his guilt would have been full and clear.
Robert Anderson

Offline pathfinder73

They only release them because people believe them. Sounds like diversion tactics.

"Two pieces of information reach us, which we interpret as diversionary tactics with the obvious purpose of diverting suspicion from the McCanns. The first concerns the couple’s active involvement in a campaign to set up an international alert system for missing children. The Policia Judiciaria is approached indirectly through the Department of Criminal Investigation in Portimão and the Directorate in Faro to participate and support the launch of the campaign. We tell the messenger that we are not the appropriate recipients of this enquiry, that the request should be sent to a higher authority, the National Director of the PJ or the Portuguese government.

The second piece of information comes to us from further afield: Beirut, capital of The Lebanon. Imagine this: an Arab shiekh possessed a video of an orgy by other shiekhs on which Madeleine was allegedly recognisable. He would be prepared to hand over this recording to the British Ambassador in exchange for a sum of money to be sent to his lawyer. Once again, we are stupified." (TOTL)
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 9 years later.

Offline jassi

There was no flesh put on the earlier reports about what leads they were pursuing, though.


That's right, so the news could easily be months old.  As usual we believe what we choose.
To all you Amaral campers out there, Hi De Hi

I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -  Almost 10 years and still no solution.

Offline stephen25000

Of course not.

It's just B.S. via the usual 'source', namely Mitchell.
The McCanns were solely responsible for their childcare arrangements and there is no one else to blame.

S and S, two more amateurs making money from a disappeared child, and clearly without a clue.

Offline G-Unit

This 'lead' has been around for so long;



It was passed to Interpol by the PJ but it petered out for lack of more information.

The press mentioned it in August 2008 after the files were released
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1041818/Email-warning-Madeleine-stolen-Belgian-paedophile-ring-took-weeks-reach-Portuguese-police.html

But it seemed quite tenuous;

a spokesman for Belgium's Federal Police said:......"We find it all a bit strange. We are not aware and we have never found a paedophile network in Belgium that could order, sell or buy children like this."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/reports-that-belgian-paedophile-ring-stole-maddy-to-order-are-flawed-887220.html
Accept nothing
Believe no-one
Confirm everything

Offline Faithlilly

This 'lead' has been around for so long;



It was passed to Interpol by the PJ but it petered out for lack of more information.

The press mentioned it in August 2008 after the files were released
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1041818/Email-warning-Madeleine-stolen-Belgian-paedophile-ring-took-weeks-reach-Portuguese-police.html

But it seemed quite tenuous;

a spokesman for Belgium's Federal Police said:......"We find it all a bit strange. We are not aware and we have never found a paedophile network in Belgium that could order, sell or buy children like this."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/reports-that-belgian-paedophile-ring-stole-maddy-to-order-are-flawed-887220.html

Ah G-Unit but obviously the BelgIan police don't want to admit that they have a child trafficking problem !
Moral Guilt
Detractors of the work of our British Police in bringing criminals to justice generally ignore the important distinction between moral proof and legal evidence of guilt. In not a few cases that are popularly classed with 'unsolved mysteries of crime,' the offender is known, but evidence is wanting. If, for example, in- a recent murder case of special notoriety and interest,* certain human remains had not been found in a cellar, a great crime would have been catalogued among `Police failures'; and yet, even without the evidence which sent themurderer to the gallows, the moral proof of his guilt would have been full and clear.
Robert Anderson

Offline xtina

if there was one iota of truth in this ......

it would have been the twins who would have been taken................
All my posts are IMO

Online davel

Good news for those who want to see a conclusion to the case
SY not giving up
as experienced investigators...based on the evidence...we believe Madeleine McCann was removed from the apartment by a stranger....DCI Redwood...Scotland Yard

Neither the McCanns nor their friend are persons of interest or suspects

If civil questions are being asked can we have the courtesy to provide civil answers.