Author Topic: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”  (Read 10113 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gertrude

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #90 on: July 08, 2018, 02:46:30 PM »
so on the present evidence teh mccanns are not suspects...which puts amarals book into perspective...obviously if new evidence comes to light things could change....thats what Ive been saying for some time

How do you know?   S.Y. are hardly going to announce if they have become suspects before they are ready to charge someone in a high profile case like this.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #91 on: July 08, 2018, 02:54:44 PM »
How do you know?   S.Y. are hardly going to announce if they have become suspects before they are ready to charge someone in a high profile case like this.

We have been through all this before.... So by your thoughts... Murat could still be in the frame... The three burglars... Just about anyone..

The PJ And SY have said the McCann's ate not suspects... The archiving report said there was no evidence of any crime by the McCann's... Themccanns don't seen to be being investigated at all... SY have spent 12 million going through the files and interviewing suspects in Portugal... The McCann's have not been interviewed under cautioun... Then we have the McCann's actions... All that tells me the McCann's are not suspects in any way.... Others can believe that both police forces are playing some bizarre game... I find that idea ridiculous
« Last Edit: July 08, 2018, 03:07:16 PM by Davel »

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #92 on: July 08, 2018, 05:12:07 PM »
How do you know?   S.Y. are hardly going to announce if they have become suspects before they are ready to charge someone in a high profile case like this.
Why not?  The PJ did just that to Murat and the McCanns in 2007.  What’s changed?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #93 on: July 08, 2018, 05:16:50 PM »
How do you know?   S.Y. are hardly going to announce if they have become suspects before they are ready to charge someone in a high profile case like this.

Of course they are not.

Until the McCanns and Murat were hauled in to be questioned directly before being made arguidos we had no official confirmation that they were even suspects, in fact quite the opposite.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #94 on: July 08, 2018, 05:19:55 PM »
Of course they are not.

Until the McCanns and Murat were hauled in to be questioned directly before being made arguidos we had no official confirmation that they were even suspects, in fact quite the opposite.

they were brought in for questioning and made arguidos because new evidence came to light...or at least they thought it had....should new evidence come to light again no doubt the same would happen

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #95 on: July 08, 2018, 06:07:14 PM »
Of course they are not.

Until the McCanns and Murat were hauled in to be questioned directly before being made arguidos we had no official confirmation that they were even suspects, in fact quite the opposite.
So the PJ announced they were suspects, why wouldn’t the Met then?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Sunny

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #96 on: July 08, 2018, 11:50:20 PM »
So the PJ announced they were suspects, why wouldn’t the Met then?

Surely the Met can't announce the McCann's as suspects as it is a Portugal crime. It would be up to the Portuguese to do that.
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Robittybob1

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #97 on: July 09, 2018, 04:34:27 AM »
Surely the Met can't announce the McCann's as suspects as it is a Portugal crime. It would be up to the Portuguese to do that.
I have heard the UK police could charge a UK citizen with a crime committed in another country.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #98 on: July 09, 2018, 09:52:37 AM »
I have heard the UK police could charge a UK citizen with a crime committed in another country.

Depends on the crime.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #99 on: July 09, 2018, 10:00:42 AM »
Surely the Met can't announce the McCann's as suspects as it is a Portugal crime. It would be up to the Portuguese to do that.

SY could treatvthe mccans ss suspects and interview  them under caution

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #100 on: July 09, 2018, 10:05:04 AM »
Surely the Met can't announce the McCann's as suspects as it is a Portugal crime. It would be up to the Portuguese to do that.
Why haven’t they then?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline barrier

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #101 on: July 09, 2018, 10:55:44 AM »
Why haven’t they then?


Would you expect the police to announce who if any one is a suspect to appease the public.

There seems to be some agreement on the not naming of suspects according to this.
dated 2013
Quote
College of Policing says forces should name suspects when charged, but not when arrested

https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/college-policing-says-forces-should-name-suspects-when-charged-not-when-arrested/
« Last Edit: July 09, 2018, 11:02:45 AM by barrier »
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #102 on: July 09, 2018, 01:40:43 PM »

Would you expect the police to announce who if any one is a suspect to appease the public.

There seems to be some agreement on the not naming of suspects according to this.
dated 2013
https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/college-policing-says-forces-should-name-suspects-when-charged-not-when-arrested/
Who mentioned "appeasing the public"?  Is that what you think the PJ did in 2007 when they made the McCanns official suspects?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Robittybob1

Re: “ The McCanns Are Not Suspects”
« Reply #103 on: July 09, 2018, 05:47:52 PM »
Who mentioned "appeasing the public"?  Is that what you think the PJ did in 2007 when they made the McCanns official suspects?
"Crucify him, crucify him!"
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.