Author Topic: Maddie McCann: Abduction theories blasted as 'ridiculous' by US crime expert.  (Read 1792 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline carlymichelle

its intresting our australian media are publishing about pat brown

Offline stephen25000

Her book was full of factual inaccuracies
Most of her knowledge of the case comes from McCann sceptic sites and the book was full of libel

Can you provide citations  for those ?
The McCanns were solely responsible for their childcare arrangements and there is no one else to blame.

S and S, two more amateurs making money from a disappeared child, and clearly without a clue.

Online Robittybob1

Can you provide citations  for those ?
You can tell that is personal opinion and doesn't require cites.
What are you doing to find Madeleine?

Offline davel

Can you provide citations  for those ?

It seems her book has disappeared
As I said she is making claims now with no evidence

In this latest article she claims the evidence supports death by an accident
It doesn't
That is a factual inaccuracy
« Last Edit: March 15, 2017, 07:35:51 AM by davel »

Offline stephen25000

It seems her book has disappeared
As I said she is making claims now with no evidence

So you make comments, and can't back it up.

Her book is still available.

Haven't you checked ?

As to claims with no evidence, what would they be ?
The McCanns were solely responsible for their childcare arrangements and there is no one else to blame.

S and S, two more amateurs making money from a disappeared child, and clearly without a clue.

Offline davel

So you make comments, and can't back it up.

Her book is still available.

Haven't you checked ?

As to claims with no evidence, what would they be ?

There is no evidence
Perhaps you could help her
Her knowledge of the case is very poor

Offline Erngath

It seems her book has disappeared
As I said she is making claims now with no evidence

In this latest article she claims the evidence supports death by an accident
It doesn't
That is a factual inaccuracy

I believe her book was removed from Amazon because of libel issues. She makes the most ridiculous statements in that article, which in my opinion is also libellous but I am no expert.

Offline carlymichelle

So you make comments, and can't back it up.

Her book is still available.

Haven't you checked ?

As to claims with no evidence, what would they be ?

im proudd of our australian media  for publishing a non biased article about the mcanns 2 in 2  days
« Last Edit: March 15, 2017, 07:46:32 AM by Eleanor »

Offline davel

I believe her book was removed from Amazon because of libel issues. She makes the most ridiculous statements in that article, which in my opinion is also libellous but I am no expert.

One of her theories is that Maddie fell behind the sofa and died
What an idiot

Offline carlymichelle

I believe her book was removed from Amazon because of libel issues. She makes the most ridiculous statements in that article, which in my opinion is also libellous but I am no expert.

australian media isnt as  repressed as the  uk media here in  australia we have feedom of speech and pat is american so the mcanns would have no case to sue

Offline davel

Pat Brown is simply stating her opinion with no evidence to support it

Offline Erngath

One of her theories is that Maddie fell behind the sofa and died
What an idiot

It's the arrogance of the woman which astounds me.

Offline carlymichelle

Pat Brown is simply stating her opinion with no evidence to support it

having a opinion isnt illegal

Offline Erngath

australian media isnt as  repressed as the  uk media here in  australia we have feedom of speech and pat is american so the mcanns would have no case to sue

Can't imagine they would bother.
I was thinking more about the article being posted on this forum and whether it was libellous.

Offline davel

It's the arrogance of the woman which astounds me.

Anyone with an ounce of intelligence would realise how her claims just do not add up
Maddie simply could not have fallen off the sofa and died
That is impossible