Author Topic: McCanns seek to have Supreme Court judgement annulled in libel damages case.  (Read 9290 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

He knew the law.

Any Portuguese citizen doing what the McCann's did, would have been charged.
But they would have to charge the other Tapas families as well as they all did the same.
What are you doing to find Madeleine?

Offline stephen25000

But they would have to charge the other Tapas families as well as they all did the same.

I agree.

They should.
The McCanns were solely responsible for their childcare arrangements and there is no one else to blame.

S and S, two more amateurs making money from a disappeared child, and clearly without a clue.

Offline davel

I agree.

They should.


but no one cares what you think

Offline davel

He knew the law.

Any Portuguese citizen doing what the McCann's did, would have been charged.

not accoring to the archiving report

Offline carlymichelle

not accoring to the archiving report

which is 10 years old  crime files change

Alfie

  • Guest
which is 10 years old  crime files change
ROFL

Offline Robittybob1

If that is what they want to do they have to hurry, as 10 years is nearly up.
What are you doing to find Madeleine?

Offline G-Unit

This is interesting;

Page 6
As far as the appellants are aware of, the archiving at stake was carried out, in the course of the investigation, because sufficient proof had been gathered that the then arguidos did not commit any facts of a criminal relevance and in any way whatsoever, this conclusion substantiating an archiving for factual reasons,

The McCanns are saying the investigation gathered 'sufficient proof' that the arguidos didn't commit a crime. I would like to see the evidence that 'proved' their non-involvement in a crime.

Accept nothing
Believe no-one
Confirm everything

Offline davel

This is interesting;

Page 6
As far as the appellants are aware of, the archiving at stake was carried out, in the course of the investigation, because sufficient proof had been gathered that the then arguidos did not commit any facts of a criminal relevance and in any way whatsoever, this conclusion substantiating an archiving for factual reasons,

The McCanns are saying the investigation gathered 'sufficient proof' that the arguidos didn't commit a crime. I would like to see the evidence that 'proved' their non-involvement in a crime.

" the non involvement of the parents, assisted witnesses, in any penally relevant action stems from the objective circumstances of them not being inside the apartment when Madeleine disappeared, from the normal behaviour that they displayed until said disappearance and afterwards, as can be amply concluded from witness statements, from the telephone communications analysis and also from the forensics' conclusions, namely the reports from the (Birmingham) Forensic Science Service (FSS) and from the National Institute for Legal Medicine.

Offline stephen25000

" the non involvement of the parents, assisted witnesses, in any penally relevant action stems from the objective circumstances of them not being inside the apartment when Madeleine disappeared, from the normal behaviour that they displayed until said disappearance and afterwards, as can be amply concluded from witness statements, from the telephone communications analysis and also from the forensics' conclusions, namely the reports from the (Birmingham) Forensic Science Service (FSS) and from the National Institute for Legal Medicine.

Have you forgotten, the crime, if one occurred of course, remains unsolved.

No other person has been found to be involved.
« Last Edit: March 20, 2017, 07:21:19 AM by stephen25000 »
The McCanns were solely responsible for their childcare arrangements and there is no one else to blame.

S and S, two more amateurs making money from a disappeared child, and clearly without a clue.

Offline davel

which is 10 years old  crime files change
ROFL LOL

Offline Slartibartfast

" the non involvement of the parents, assisted witnesses, in any penally relevant action stems from the objective circumstances of them not being inside the apartment when Madeleine disappeared, from the normal behaviour that they displayed until said disappearance and afterwards, as can be amply concluded from witness statements, from the telephone communications analysis and also from the forensics' conclusions, namely the reports from the (Birmingham) Forensic Science Service (FSS) and from the National Institute for Legal Medicine.

You missed the "It appears..."
Helping Elite sufferers of NPD for over 2 years...

Alfie

  • Guest
You missed the "It appears..."
Please put "it appears" in the passage quoted by Davel.


Offline ferryman

Please put "it appears" in the passage quoted by Davel.

Slarti knows better than the prosecutors, though, Alfie ....

Offline Slartibartfast

Please put "it appears" in the passage quoted by Davel.

I'm sure you know where it goes.

Quote
It appears that the non involvement of the parents, assisted witnesses, in any penally relevant action stems from the objective circumstances of them not being inside the apartment when Madeleine disappeared, from the normal behaviour that they displayed until said disappearance and afterwards, as can be amply concluded from witness statements, from the telephone communications analysis and also from the forensics' conclusions, namely the reports from the (Birmingham) Forensic Science Service (FSS) and from the National Institute for Legal Medicine.

Or

Quote
The non involvement of the arguidos parents of Madeleine in any penally relevant action seems to result from the objective circumstances of them not being inside the apartment when she disappeared, from the normal behaviour that they adopted until said disappearance and afterwards, as can be amply concluded from the witness statements, from the telephone communications analysis and also from the forensics' conclusions, namely the Reports from the FSS and from the National Institute for Legal Medicine.
Helping Elite sufferers of NPD for over 2 years...