Author Topic: Pathology report and witness statement  (Read 121 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Daisy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 168
Pathology report and witness statement
« on: March 19, 2017, 08:42:21 PM »
As promised I attach the pathology report and witness statement

Also attached is the relevant part of the trial transcript.
« Last Edit: March 20, 2017, 09:10:26 AM by Daisy »

Offline John

  • Global Moderator
  • Executive Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11821
  • Senior Editor
    • Justice 4 John Lamberton
Re: Pathology report and witness statement
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2017, 09:39:16 AM »
As promised I attach the pathology report and witness statement

Also attached is the relevant part of the trial transcript.

Thank you Daisy, hopefully we can put the myths to bed.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. John Lamberton exposes malfeasance by public officials.
Check out my website >   http://johnlamberton.webs.com/index.htm?no_redirect=true     The truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Myster

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2201
  • "Open the pod bay doors, HOL!!!"
Re: Pathology report and witness statement
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2017, 12:40:53 PM »
As promised I attach the pathology report and witness statement

Also attached is the relevant part of the trial transcript.
Blimey, only half a page Path Report!?... not much time wasted examining the body then!

All we can deduce from that is the evidence was compromised by some clumsy excavation work, and Sami didn't bury himself.

But I'd like to ask Daisy's opinion, without any snail mail to Mark Alexander, exactly what she thinks the cubic metre of concrete which he poured over the other three layers is achieving, other than to ensure that his father's body would never be discovered... except by an inquisitive police force?
‘Somebody in this case is lying, and lying their heads off.’ Anthony Arlidge QC, closing speech at the Bamber trial, 22 October 1986

Offline Daisy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 168
Re: Pathology report and witness statement
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2017, 07:03:47 PM »
Blimey, only half a page Path Report!?... not much time wasted examining the body then!

All we can deduce from that is the evidence was compromised by some clumsy excavation work, and Sami didn't bury himself.

But I'd like to ask Daisy's opinion, without any snail mail to Mark Alexander, exactly what she thinks the cubic metre of concrete which he poured over the other three layers is achieving, other than to ensure that his father's body would never be discovered... except by an inquisitive police force?

Mark poured concrete over all the areas in pure innocence.  I believe him until I see evidence to the contrary.  He assumed his father had had all the areas prepared and had no idea he was buried beneath one of them.  Mark was trying to do his best to help with work around the house and garden.

Offline Myster

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2201
  • "Open the pod bay doors, HOL!!!"
Re: Pathology report and witness statement
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2017, 07:44:04 PM »
Mark poured concrete over all the areas in pure innocence.  I believe him until I see evidence to the contrary.  He assumed his father had had all the areas prepared and had no idea he was buried beneath one of them.  Mark was trying to do his best to help with work around the house and garden.
Ah, now then... we've only had half the story, because I've never heard anything about Mark Alexander pouring or laying concrete over other areas. I assumed this cubic metre was the only amount he ordered, delivered by the concrete firm in one load and dumped only on the spot where Sami was buried.  Is there any written or voice record of more being ordered by Mark and delivered for the other areas which you now mention.
‘Somebody in this case is lying, and lying their heads off.’ Anthony Arlidge QC, closing speech at the Bamber trial, 22 October 1986

Offline Daisy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 168
Re: Pathology report and witness statement
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2017, 08:09:02 PM »
Ah, now then... we've only had half the story, because I've never heard anything about Mark Alexander pouring or laying concrete over other areas. I assumed this cubic metre was the only amount he ordered, delivered by the concrete firm in one load and dumped only on the spot where Sami was buried.  Is there any written or voice record of more being ordered by Mark and delivered for the other areas which you now mention.

Sorry I assumed when he ordered concrete it was for all areas and not just one section. When all areas had been prepped why would you just complete one area? However you raise a valid point and I will clarify with Mark.

Offline Angelo222

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4855
  • Post editor
Re: Pathology report and witness statement
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2017, 05:32:25 PM »
Sorry I assumed when he ordered concrete it was for all areas and not just one section. When all areas had been prepped why would you just complete one area? However you raise a valid point and I will clarify with Mark.

Dumping multiple layers of mortar and a layer on concrete in a hole adjacent to the garage has little to do with underpinning any wall and much to do with a concerted effort to conceal a body. Only the victim's son had free unfettered access to the property so the suggestion that some elusive third party did it is pretty ridiculous imo.

But back to the subject under discussion, the pathology report is a bit bare surely?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Offline Myster

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2201
  • "Open the pod bay doors, HOL!!!"
Re: Pathology report and witness statement
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2017, 05:53:27 PM »
No mention of attempted burning of the body either, yet it was reported in other papers besides the Mail. How come?
‘Somebody in this case is lying, and lying their heads off.’ Anthony Arlidge QC, closing speech at the Bamber trial, 22 October 1986

Offline Miss Taken Identity

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1932
Re: Pathology report and witness statement
« Reply #8 on: March 24, 2017, 09:44:50 PM »
Dumping multiple layers of mortar and a layer on concrete in a hole adjacent to the garage has little to do with underpinning any wall and much to do with a concerted effort to conceal a body. Only the victim's son had free unfettered access to the property so the suggestion that some elusive third party did it is pretty ridiculous imo.

But back to the subject under discussion, the pathology report is a bit bare surely?

Yes at least the pathologist noticed the person was dead! I found it interesting the 'blows' are not defined as in 'could have been drilled by a drill'? I mean some pathologists notice things like, blunt blow to the head or a knife wound with a jagged edge or some such thing.

It is a wonder why the mention of 'partially burned body' was made known to journos.