Author Topic: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?  (Read 274804 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline APRIL

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1770 on: May 15, 2020, 05:59:35 PM »
Who’s the author of this https://jeremybamber.org/jeremy-bamber/ ?

Coping with the tragedies at White House Farm

Everyone copes with trauma in different ways. Jeremy had been kept away from the house when the Fire Arms Team were called in. He had been asked to stay in a police car on Pages Lane with officers who testified that he was distressed. He kept looking as though he was going to break down and they distracted him with talk of other things. PC Lay stated in his 1st of October statement:

“There were two or 3 occasions during the conversation that Jeremy appeared to be getting upset. On one of these occasions he said, “Oh God, I hope she hasn’t done anything stupid.” I didn’t ask him to elaborate on that remark as the man was getting distressed and so I steered the conversation to another subject.”

Lay goes on to say:

“The Witham Duty Sergeant came over to the car. He went to the nearside and opened the passenger door and said – I’m very sorry there’s no hope for any of them.” Or words to that effect. At that Jeremy burst into tears and the Sergeant tried to console him.”

Other officers detail in their statements that Jeremy was crying and was visibly upset and distressed. When the doctor arrived he gave him a sip of whiskey from a hip flask, which  made Jeremy sick. When they took Jeremy to his home, police insisted he eat something to stop him from retching. He had little food in the house and went to the fridge. The only thing he could find was bacon which he put into the microwave and then into two pieces of bread. He ate this with the encouragement of the police officers and so is the kernel of the myth of the jolly Jeremy Bamber sitting at this kitchen table eating a hearty cooked breakfast with police officers.

Many of Jeremy’s responses have been used against him, for example, the talk of buying a Porsche was used as evidence to demonstrate that he was already planning to spend his inheritance on a new sports car, but the truth was that Jeremy was referring to a buying a cheap replica Porsche kit. The case is littered with myths and circumstantial evidence. The facts are that there was no evidence against Jeremy Bamber; nothing connected him to the scene. In court the moderator was the only thing suggesting that Sheila had not shot herself. She could not have fired one shot leaving her blood in the moderator and then taken the moderator downstairs and put it in the gun cupboard and returning upstairs again where she was found. Even though this still did not connect Jeremy to the killings, the judge stated at court that because Jeremy said his father had made the call to him – it meant the killer had to be either Jeremy or Sheila and not a third party. It does beg the question as to why there has been so much emphasis placed on the precarious evidence of Mugford and her hit man story which was demonstrably disproved. So, with absolutely no evidence – why is he in prison?

Jeremy Bamber let Julie Mugford and his friends and relatives take over the running of almost every part of the aftermath of the tragedy.[1] Unable to cope with entering White House Farm without experiencing trauma and severe anxiety Jeremy continued to smoke cannabis heavily, whilst drinking alcohol and taking diazepam as prescribed by his doctor. [2]

The question must have turned over in his mind a million times: If I hadn’t left the gun out on the settle would this still have happened?Had he forgotten to take the magazine out or not? No, he was sure he had taken the magazine out. Had Sheila noticed that he had left the gun like this? He had blamed himself for his own mistakes, but then the farm was full of guns. A collection of seven weapons including rifles and shotguns were there, and he knew that Sheila could have picked up any one of those at any time.

The family solicitor was later interviewed by police and confirmed that he had advised Jeremy to find out the order of deaths[3] something which was later to be used against him by this relatives and the police. Later when the City of London Police investigated, Mr Wilson told them that Jeremy was very emotional on his visits to him and that he had advised Jeremy that he should be appointed sole director of the businesses.[4] A few days after the tragedy Jeremy had to face going into the farm, Ann Eaton took Jeremy around the house after she had been in to clean it and remove valuable items she wanted for herself and her family. She stated that he did not want to go into each room and she described Jeremy as “frightened, hesitant and petrified,” a normal reaction for someone having to face where the bodies of their family had been found. [5]

The family accountant had confirmed that Nevill’s bank account was overdrawn by almost £100,000; [6] all of the estate was tied up in assets. Nevill had borrowed this money to convert his estate in Guildford into five houses. Jeremy had the responsibility of running the farm at harvest time, coping with the funerals of his family, the shock, his grief and the prospect of having little money for funerals as well as paying staff wages. He was an inexperienced farmer at just 24 years old, and Basil Cock had advised that Jeremy appoint Peter Eaton as farm manager to help. Jeremy was also advised that death duties would be high and he would have to find ways of cutting down costs. At the time inheritance duties were 40% of all monies inherited over £200,000. The financial difficulty Jeremy faced was because he was to inherit both his parent’s estates at once. The accountant told him that he would owe around £80,000 in tax.

Brett Collins, Julie and Jeremy went out drinking together a frequently after the tragedy, Jeremy Bamber recently said in an interview with the Mirror Newspaper “I am certainly not alone in turning to alcohol in sorrow – nor in seeking the company of others who cared about me.”Brett tried to keep Jeremy’s spirits high with good humour and Jeremy even joined his friend, the twins father, Colin Caffell on the 9th of August where he, Jeremy, Julie, Brett and three others went for Chinese meal and then on to a concert as both Jeremy and Colin tried to put a brave face on their grief. [7]

Some weeks later after the tragedy Jeremy attended the farm. On the 23rd August he asked both Barbara Wilson and Jean Bouttell to clear out much of the clutter that filled up the rooms of White House Farm. This included a large collection of magazines in the kitchen under which Jean Bouttell found the spare telephone. She asked Jeremy what she should do with it he just remarked it was a spare.[8] There was much discussion over this telephone which was later a court exhibit.

Jeremy had cheated on Julie Mugford with her friend Lizzie prior to the tragedies and he had also felt that his time with Julie had come to an end, so he broke of their relationship. Her endless demanding behaviour must have become tiresome to him. He had offered to buy Julie a wine bar in London and had given her money to help her as a student teacher. Jeremy wanted to be with another woman called Virginia whom he had known for some time. He turned to Virginia for comfort away from Julie’s violent tantrums and demands. Did Bamber tell the author of this piece this ?[9] Julie was becoming more and more difficult and resented Brett Collins being around and suspected that they were lovers.

Brett had said he was experienced in the sale of antiques and together with Jeremy they took some valuables to Sotheby’s for auction to raise funds to help with the impending death duties much to the horror of the relatives. During the period before he was charged with the murders Jeremy Bamber had twice headed overseas rejecting what had happened and feeling distressed at the constant press intrusion into his life.

After DCI Jones was removed as head of the investigation he worked under Supt Ainsley. DCI Jones had to arrest Jeremy Bamber for the first time at Moorshead Mansions.  Almost immediately after his arrest and still at the flat Jeremy had blurted out that he had possession of Marijuana and handed some over to Jones.  At interview he easily confessed to burgling the caravan park to prove a point by using a key kept inside the letter box.  He also confessed to cultivating marijuana in his back garden which he sold to friends.  For someone who owns up to crime so easily, it seems to me that if Jeremy Bamber had committed the killings he would not be able to stop himself from confessing.  Nevertheless, in 29 years there has never been any admission.

After his first arrest on the 8th of September, he was questioned for four days sometimes until 11pm at night. The interviews were not audio recorded but hand written each day. The first two days of questioning were done without Jeremy having a solicitor present. Police constantly pressed him on the positioning of the gun accusing him of telling some police officers that the rifle was on the table, but he was adamant the gun was on the settle.  DS Stan Jones asked him if he had or hadn’t fired the gun.  He was insistent that he had not fired the rifle.  They went over and over the telephone call from his father.  The records of these interviews span for hundreds of pages.  DS Jones told Jeremy that Julie had said that he had called her before calling the police which contradicted what both he and Julie had initially told police. The time of the call needed to be ‘fixed’ at a much earlier time for the prosecution to state that he called Julie first. This corresponds to PC West’s log having been recorded much earlier but he altered his testimony saying that he filled the log out wrong by ten minutes.

After days of questioning Jeremy gave in with confusion and said that maybe he did call Julie first.  This single discrepancy was used against Jeremy although it actually has no real bearing on the facts; whether he called Julie first or the police second the events still happened just as he had said.  Since the interview Jeremy has maintained that he called the police before he called Julie.  There are no other discrepancies in Jeremy’s accounts throughout his 29 years. This single issue was used to state that Jeremy had lied. Jeremy Bamber’s account has stood up to scrutiny over 29 years and is very robust by comparison with the testimony of Mugford, who had lied about their engagement, the end of their relationship, Jeremy’s relationship with Collins, MacDonald being the hit man, her involvement in drugs and crime independently of Jeremy and her pre-trial deal with the NOTW for 25k.

Through all of the witness accounts, many people have altered their accounts and statements contradicted each other. There is only one account which remains the same to this day and it is the account of Jeremy Bamber.  This is because it is the truth and the truth does not alter. Other witnesses (both Police Officers and relatives) have exaggerated and embellished their original accounts in the media and to different police enquiries.  Jeremy has coped with the strain of the continual questioning and by comparison with other miscarriages of justice his version of accounts has not altered; he has never confessed nor altered his account under duress.

After his first arrest and release without charge Jeremy was approached by the newspapers for his story.  Naively he went to meet with one after his solicitor advised him against it.  Jeremy was tired of being vilified by the newspapers after his arrest and wanted to tell his story.  Jeremy said that Brett Collins also advised that he should go to meet with the journalist. The Sun journalist wasn’t interested in Jeremy’s account, and continually asked questions about Sheila Caffell and requested any modelling pictures which might have been pornographic.  Jeremy had told him that there were none and that there might have been some topless ones but Colin Caffell would have those.  The journalist ran the story reporting that the newspaper had been offered these pictures and they also went to the police. The newspaper never obtained pictures of Sheila, because they didn’t exist, further proof that Jeremy Bamber had not intended to sell any pictures to the newspaper.

Jeremy’s efforts to tell his story had gone disastrously wrong. This coupled with the burglary at the caravan park made the outlook very bleak.  Stories escalated about Jeremy’s relationship with Brett Collins and his trips abroad.  Acquaintances turned their backs on him and his often eccentric, foolish behaviour and socializing with homosexuals was amplified by local gossip.  His enjoyment of cannabis, later down classified to a class C drug and frequently used by the middle classes was also a major point of “criminality” used by the prosecution.  He was presented as having spent a lot of money on holidays but the reality was on his trip to Amsterdam he, Brett and Julie had shared the same room to economise.

After his arrest the trip to the South of France was glamorized but the fact was that Jeremy and Brett stayed in a caravan to keep the costs low.  Anything to escape the now intrusive and destructive glare of the media, Jeremy was an innocent man subjected to similar treatment as other people who are vilified in the press and subsequently released without charge.

Jeremy had continued smoking pot, taking prescribed sedatives[10] and alcohol to drown out the shock, pain and sorrow.  His arrest and high media profile prompted his new love Virginia to turn her back on him. Bamber was seeing Anji Greaves NOT Virginia Julie had contrived a convoluted story to the police, and his relatives had turned against him and by their own admission, were taking belongings from his family home without his permission.[11] Colin Caffell had become distant and had written to him saying that the relatives had insisted that Jeremy was duping him and was definitely guilty and Colin didn’t know what to believe now his beautiful twins were dead and Jeremy had been arrested and released without charge.[12]

Now Jeremy was in virtual exile in France with his friend Brett trying to support him in the only way he knew how, by leading him to drinking dens. After a short period under police surveillance the officers abandoned their suspect realizing that Jeremy was not going to do anything helpful to the prosecution’s case.[13] Jeremy found the pain was dampened by drinking until the small hours of the night and eventually both he and Brett caught food poisoning on their return journey to the UK by ferry. Jeremy was arrested and charged with murder at the port of Dover. On his arrival in a police vehichle on his last day of freedom, there were several women  waving to him and calling out his name. He smiled back as the cameras snapped him in a dazed, exhausted blur of a mask which veiled the pain he would carry for at least another 29 years.  This was a photograph often used over the years by the press to demonstrate that he was a shallow and arrogant young man.



To the accompaniment of violins, undoubtedly.

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1771 on: May 15, 2020, 06:03:03 PM »

To the accompaniment of violins, undoubtedly.

Any idea who wrote it April?

The author appears to have remained anonymous - unless I’ve missed something ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1772 on: May 15, 2020, 06:14:10 PM »
I agree. A story was presented, but I'm not convinced it was proved beyond reasonable doubt to be true.


Look, Jeremy Bamber was found guilty despite the fact police messed up.

They didn’t protect the crime scene

They trampled all over the house at the inept DCI Taff’s orders

They destroyed, removed and burned vital evidence

Jeremy was allowed to have his parents and sister cremated, which should have sent alarm bells ringing immediately

Police took forever to do a thorough search of WHF — long after evidence had been destroyed

Taff Jones didn’t even CONSIDER someone else could have been responsible — he just took JM’s word

Items were left in lockers/desks before they were even sent off to forensics



The police were COMPLETELY inept, incompetent, and followed Taff’s instructions out of fear for their jobs.


Jeremy realised all this after spending a few years inside talking to fellow inmates who told him how stupid the police were — and that’s why Jeremy Bamber is jumping on EVERY SINGLE ERROR/TYPO he can find to try and get off due to the ineptitude of the police.

HAD the police done their job properly Jeremy Bamber would have been found guilty unanimously, given a life sentence, and would’ve been forgotten about decades ago. But the police messed up — and that’s why he’s able to come out with petty discrepancies to try and claim he was “set up”, or they got things wrong.

His campaign team go along with it, for their own reasons...and this will continue until he’s dead or until the courts order that he can no longer request leave for further appeals — which I suspect they’ll order some time soon. He can’t keep wasting the courts time and money appealing on a ludicrous technicality that can’t exonerate him: he’d set a precedent for every lifer in prison to do the same, and the courts would be overrun with ridiculous appeals from dangerous, violent psychopaths who’ve committed the most heinous of crimes, such as him.
« Last Edit: May 15, 2020, 08:30:43 PM by Ispywithmybigeye »
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline APRIL

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1773 on: May 15, 2020, 06:16:39 PM »
Any idea who wrote it April?

The author appears to have remained anonymous - unless I’ve missed something ?


No, I haven't, Nicholas. But I'm reasonably confident that it someone who thinks the sun shines out of his nethers!!!

Offline Myster

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1774 on: May 15, 2020, 06:20:58 PM »

No, I haven't, Nicholas. But I'm reasonably confident that it someone who thinks the sun shines out of his nethers!!!
That's putting it far too mildly.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline APRIL

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1775 on: May 15, 2020, 06:30:07 PM »
That's putting it far too mildly.

 @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1776 on: May 15, 2020, 06:32:06 PM »
Any idea who wrote it April?

The author appears to have remained anonymous - unless I’ve missed something ?


I’ve seen some of those words in Jeremy Bamber’s blog, so it’s definitely originated from him. He’s obviously got someone to post it online, pretending it’s been written by them. No doubt, he’s told them to alter it a little to try and make it look unlike his writing style — but he wrote all that nonsense.

He’s a typical psychopath. He’s twisted everything to try and manipulate. For example, the police expressed shock when he said he was “starving “ and made himself a hearty English breakfast, and sat eating it in front of them. They actually wrote it in their report.

This fairytale above claims they “encouraged” him to eat. What rubbish. Can you imagine police telling a “victim” just a few hours after discovering all their family dead to make himself a “hearty breakfast “?  Or anyone for that matter? The LAST thing you’d do at such a time is try and encourage someone to EAT!

Like all psychopaths, he’s twisted it and said “I only microwaved the bacon”, as though that makes it normal...FGS

You can’t eat a THING after a tragedy. Nothing. But he’s a psychopath so he wouldn’t realise that.
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1777 on: May 15, 2020, 07:02:55 PM »

I’ve seen some of those words in Jeremy Bamber’s blog, so it’s definitely originated from him. He’s obviously got someone to post it online, pretending it’s been written by them. No doubt, he’s told them to alter it a little to try and make it look unlike his writing style — but he wrote all that nonsense.

But why has Bamber or whoever’s written and published it claimed Virginia turned ‘her back on him’ when it was Anji he was seeing NOT Virginia ?


Jeremy had continued smoking pot, taking prescribed sedatives[10] and alcohol to drown out the shock, pain and sorrow.  His arrest and high media profile prompted his new love Virginia to turn her back on him.

There’s no mention of ‘Anne’ the barmaid from Colchester.

No mention of him having phoned Suzette Ford asking her if she was still in love with him.

Sue Ford attended his trial https://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=88.msg750#msg750 after Bamber used the ‘Hoover Maneuver‘ on her https://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/hoover-maneuver-the-dirty-secret-of-emotional-abuse-0219154

Plus Anji Greaves doesn’t appear to have turned her back on him ‘after his arrest’ - she was waiting for him with a journalist inside a hotel room

Media photos are of Anji https://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/news-photo/mr-brett-collins-and-angela-greaves-the-29-year-old-news-photo/830974720 NOT Virginia

There are no photos of Virginia they are all of Anji

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-crime-murder-jeremy-bamber-maldon-1985-111059828.html
« Last Edit: May 15, 2020, 07:35:04 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1778 on: May 15, 2020, 07:39:42 PM »

https://jeremybamber.org/jeremy-bamber/

His arrest and high media profile prompted his new love Virginia to turn her back on him.

Suspect Aunt Agatha knows Bamber was seeing Anji Greaves and may well know when and why their relationship ended
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1779 on: May 15, 2020, 07:45:59 PM »
Today on twitter via JB Campaign ltd  @)(++(*


JB Campaign LTD
@jbcampaignltd
#JeremyBamber patron
@Michelle_Diskin
 is the sister of Barry George who was wrongly convicted in 2001 of the killing of TV presenter Jill Dando. His conviction was quashed at appeal in 2007 and in 2008 he was retried and found unanimously not guilty.
https://jeremy-bamber.co.uk/patrons-and-supporters
5:53 PM · May 15, 2020·Twitter Web App


https://mobile.twitter.com/jbcampaignltd/status/1261339033868947457

Following Barry George’s acquittal he was placed under MAPPA where he remains today

In 2013 Lord Justice Beatson and Mr Justice Irwin said:

"There was indeed a case upon which a reasonable jury properly directed could have convicted the claimant of murder."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21195269
« Last Edit: May 15, 2020, 08:10:05 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1780 on: May 15, 2020, 08:14:15 PM »

I don’t know if any of his supporters have a BDP, but the ones I’ve seen post on Twitter become quickly enraged if you disagree with them, which is somewhat “emotional”, I guess...

Oh, and they block you immediately, but that’s because they refuse to hear. They’d rather be DEAF.

I don’t think it’s in the link I put up, but one woman who began writing to a prisoner in America, and insisted he was innocent, eventually had him move in with her when he managed to get released.

That didn’t end well, either.

Just a few weeks later he sliced off one of her ears and pulled some of her teeth out with pliers...

”Convicted murderer who killed his girlfriend after being released from prison was considered a 'high risk to public'
Paul O'Hara stabbed Cherylee Shennan to death two years after being getting out of jail - Jan 2019” (sic)


The inquiry into the death of 40-year-old Cherylee Shennan heard that she had begun a relationship with O’Hara, after he had been released on licence from prison after serving 15 years of a life sentence for the murder of a previous partner.

O’Hara was subject to a life licence with close supervision and monitoring by the National Probation Service when he murdered Cherylee in Rawtenstall.

He stabbed to death a previous partner, Janine Waterworth in Shaw, Oldham in 1998.

The court heard that on March 1, 2014, Cherylee contacted a domestic violence hotline saying that O’Hara had ‘broken her jaw’.

Police attended the alleged incident but reported that there were no visible injuries and Cherylee had said she made the allegations up to ‘get back’ at O’Hara as she thought he was being unfaithful.

At the start of a second week of a six-week hearing, a jury a six women and four men heard a full day of evidence from O’Hara’s probation officer Rosemary Heyes.

She had been O Hara’s offender manager since the final months of his prison sentence and had prepared a report for his parole hearing.

The inquest heard that he had reached his 15 year tariff and had ‘engaged well’ while in prison.

However, Miss Heyes said that her assessment was that at the point of release O’Hara presented ‘a high risk to the public’ and a risk matrix had calculated he had a 75 per cent chance of re-offending within a two year period.

She said: “The triggers for him would be use of alcohol and drugs which he had issues with prior to incarceration, poor thinking skills and psychological issues.”

Miss Heyes told the court that O’Hara was released from jail in April 2012 into supervised premises in Heywood, where he was tested daily for drugs and alcohol and subject to a strict curfew.

After four months he moved to independent living while continuing weekly supervision meetings with Miss Heyes.

In August 2013 he volunteered to her that he had formed a relationship with Cherylee.

Under the terms of his licence he had to disclose to Cherylee his conviction and Miss Heyes had meetings with Cherylee where she was briefed on actions to be taken should she have concerns about his behaviour.

Earlier in the hearing the court heard evidence that O’Hara had a ‘controlling’ nature and that Cherylee had told friends and relatives she had been punched and headbutted by O’Hara.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/convicted-murderer-who-killed-girlfriend-16486659
« Last Edit: May 15, 2020, 08:35:46 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1781 on: May 15, 2020, 08:51:43 PM »
”Convicted murderer who killed his girlfriend after being released from prison was considered a 'high risk to public'
Paul O'Hara stabbed Cherylee Shennan to death two years after being getting out of jail - Jan 2019” (sic)
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/convicted-murderer-who-killed-girlfriend-16486659

Paul O'Hara jailed for whole-life term over second girlfriend's murder - 2014

In sentencing O'Hara, Recorder of Preston, Judge Anthony Russell QC, said he was "very dangerous to women".
He gave the killer 10 years for attacking Det Sgt McAllister and two years for the assault on Det Con Kenworthy, to run concurrently to his whole life term for murder.
Det Supt Eddie Thistlethwaite described Ms Shennan's death as "truly horrendous".
He said: "O'Hara is a predatory and violent individual who manipulated his victims including Cherylee, praying on their craving for love and attention.
"He has shown no or little remorse throughout this process and his actions fully justify the sentence which has been imposed."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-28089357

Police and probation failures left killer free to murder new partner, inquest rules - July 2019

“Failures on the part of police and probation services left a convicted murderer free to kill a second partner, who had warned authorities she was scared for her life, an inquest has found.
Paul O’Hara rushed into Cherylee Shennan’s home as she reported his domestic abuse to two police officers in March 2014.
He attacked the trio with a hammer before chasing the 40-year-old into the street, stabbing her to death.
It later came to light he had stabbed his previous partner, Janine Waterworth, to death in Oldham in “very similar circumstances” in 1998.
He had been jailed for life for murder that same year and only released on licence in 2013.
After three weeks of evidence in front of a jury, an inquest has now ruled Shennan, of Rawtenstall, Lancashire, was unlawfully killed.
It found a failure to recall O’Hara to jail, despite Shennan's reports of his violence towards her, contributed to her death.
She had voiced her worries to probation workers on the day she died, and the service had also heard of a report of domestic violence made by her just over two weeks beforehand.
However, on March 14, 2014, the probation service chose not to call O’Hara back to prison, as it was said Ms Shennan had then retracted the allegations. She went on to die three days later.
Two police officers were present when she was murdered as they had been called to a report of domestic abuse.
Lancashire police said Det Sgt Damien McAllister and Det Con Karen Kenworthy went to Shennan’s home following a probation service referral of domestic abuse at the hands of O’Hara.
But O’Hara forced his way into Shennan’s cottage within minutes of their arrival, and set about her with a hammer, before turning on the police officers.
Ms Shennan escaped her home but the court at the original trial heard neighbours saw her kneeling in the street as O’Hara “methodically” rained down blows.
She was pronounced dead at the scene – with a post-mortem examination discovering the former beautician died of multiple stab wounds.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/paul-o-hara-cherylee-shennan-murder-inquest-domestic-abuse-lancashire-police-a9015461.html
« Last Edit: May 15, 2020, 09:15:47 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1782 on: May 15, 2020, 09:20:37 PM »
Police and probation failures left killer free to murder new partner, inquest rules - July 2019
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/paul-o-hara-cherylee-shennan-murder-inquest-domestic-abuse-lancashire-police-a9015461.html

Wonder what Paul O’Hara’s psychological assessments said about him before he was released from prison to murder again and what were the arguments advanced by him and his prison lawyers at his parole hearing ?


A report by Lancashire Coroner James Newton said “the lack of inter-agency management or the appropriate sharing of information” also possibly contributed to her death.

The report also argues there was a weak understanding of O’Hara’s manipulative personality and poor risk management of him.

It found there had been no face-to-face visit carried out by Greater Manchester Probation Trust (GMPT) preceding his release and afterwards there was no visibility of his licence conditions.

GMPT also did not inform police of the relationship – which meant no vulnerable person marker was put on her address.

Mr Newton said if police been conscious of the relationship there could have been “other pairs of eyes” keeping an eye on the situation.

The court heard O’Hara, who on release in 2012 was considered “of high risk of causing significant harm to women”, was subject to a life licence and monitoring.”


Evil monster who killed two of his girlfriends will spend the rest of his life in jail
In 1998 evil Paul O'Hara, then aged 27, lay in a darkened alleyway for Janine Waterworth, 21, and grabbed her - stabbing her fatally 12 times in revenge for their relationship ending.
He was jailed for life but released early in April 2012 after serving 13-and-a-half years for the cold-blooded slaying.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/485882/Murderer-Paul-O-Hara-jailed-for-life


How and why was O’Hara released early from his life sentence for murdering Janine Waterworth?

According to Liz Hull for the Daily Mail he’d been diagnosed with ‘psychopathic traits in prison
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7270477/Convicted-killer-murdered-girlfriend-free-kill-second-woman-blunders-police.html

Don’t know how accurate this is but according to a 2016 article by the Daily Star

Nearly 100 lifers released from prison only to commit another sick crime
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/100-lifers-released-prison-commit-20688006
« Last Edit: May 15, 2020, 09:39:41 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1783 on: May 15, 2020, 09:37:47 PM »
But why has Bamber or whoever’s written and published it claimed Virginia turned ‘her back on him’ when it was Anji he was seeing NOT Virginia ?

There’s no mention of ‘Anne’ the barmaid from Colchester.

No mention of him having phoned Suzette Ford asking her if she was still in love with him.

Sue Ford attended his trial https://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=88.msg750#msg750 after Bamber used the ‘Hoover Maneuver‘ on her https://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/hoover-maneuver-the-dirty-secret-of-emotional-abuse-0219154

Plus Anji Greaves doesn’t appear to have turned her back on him ‘after his arrest’ - she was waiting for him with a journalist inside a hotel room

Media photos are of Anji https://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/news-photo/mr-brett-collins-and-angela-greaves-the-29-year-old-news-photo/830974720 NOT Virginia

There are no photos of Virginia they are all of Anji

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-crime-murder-jeremy-bamber-maldon-1985-111059828.html


I’m not up to date with all his dalliances; but I’ve seen an article about Anji.  I can’t quite grasp how he had the stamina to have a trio on the go all at one time, and that was the period between him murdering his family and being arrested about six weeks later when he was apparently grief stricken! He kept himself entertained during his mourning, didn’t he?!

And Brett! Wasn’t Brett his secret lover too? Brett alluded to it in the newspaper article some years later...or was he just some bum-fun for Jeremy before dashing off to meet Sue Ford, Virginia, Angie and “steady girlfriend’” Julie?  No wonder he had to visit his GP for the rashes/sores he developed...Oh, I wonder if he informed the Swiss woman he met in France and had back-scratching sex with that he’d discovered those sores? Probably not...

Haven’t read about Ann, but whoever she was she dodged a bullet didn’t she?!
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1784 on: May 15, 2020, 09:46:35 PM »
Wonder what Paul O’Hara’s psychological assessments said about him before he was released from prison to murder again and what were the arguments advanced by him and his prison lawyers at his parole hearing ?


A report by Lancashire Coroner James Newton said “the lack of inter-agency management or the appropriate sharing of information” also possibly contributed to her death.

The report also argues there was a weak understanding of O’Hara’s manipulative personality and poor risk management of him.

It found there had been no face-to-face visit carried out by Greater Manchester Probation Trust (GMPT) preceding his release and afterwards there was no visibility of his licence conditions.

GMPT also did not inform police of the relationship – which meant no vulnerable person marker was put on her address.

Mr Newton said if police been conscious of the relationship there could have been “other pairs of eyes” keeping an eye on the situation.

The court heard O’Hara, who on release in 2012 was considered “of high risk of causing significant harm to women”, was subject to a life licence and monitoring.”


Evil monster who killed two of his girlfriends will spend the rest of his life in jail
In 1998 evil Paul O'Hara, then aged 27, lay in a darkened alleyway for Janine Waterworth, 21, and grabbed her - stabbing her fatally 12 times in revenge for their relationship ending.
He was jailed for life but released early in April 2012 after serving 13-and-a-half years for the cold-blooded slaying.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/485882/Murderer-Paul-O-Hara-jailed-for-life


How and why was O’Hara released early from his life sentence for murdering Janine Waterworth?

According to Liz Hull for the Daily Mail he’d been diagnosed with ‘psychopathic traits in prison
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7270477/Convicted-killer-murdered-girlfriend-free-kill-second-woman-blunders-police.html

Don’t know how accurate this is but according to a 2016 article by the Daily Star

Nearly 100 lifers released from prison only to commit another sick crime
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/100-lifers-released-prison-commit-20688006

Would be interested to learn who represented Paul O’Hara at his parole hearing which saw him released early (2012) from prison, following his life sentence
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation