I agree. A story was presented, but I'm not convinced it was proved beyond reasonable doubt to be true.
Look, Jeremy Bamber was found guilty despite the fact police messed up.
They didn’t protect the crime scene
They trampled all over the house at the inept DCI Taff’s orders
They destroyed, removed and burned vital evidence
Jeremy was allowed to have his parents and sister cremated, which should have sent alarm bells ringing immediately
Police took forever to do a thorough search of WHF — long after evidence had been destroyed
Taff Jones didn’t even CONSIDER someone else could have been responsible — he just took JM’s word
Items were left in lockers/desks before they were even sent off to forensics
The police were COMPLETELY inept, incompetent, and followed Taff’s instructions out of fear for their jobs.
Jeremy realised all this after spending a few years inside talking to fellow inmates who told him how stupid the police were — and that’s why Jeremy Bamber is jumping on EVERY SINGLE ERROR/TYPO he can find to try and get off due to the ineptitude of the police.
HAD the police done their job properly Jeremy Bamber would have been found guilty unanimously, given a life sentence, and would’ve been forgotten about decades ago. But the police messed up — and that’s why he’s able to come out with petty discrepancies to try and claim he was “set up”, or they got things wrong.
His campaign team go along with it, for their own reasons...and this will continue until he’s dead or until the courts order that he can no longer request leave for further appeals — which I suspect they’ll order some time soon. He can’t keep wasting the courts time and money appealing on a ludicrous technicality that can’t exonerate him: he’d set a precedent for every lifer in prison to do the same, and the courts would be overrun with ridiculous appeals from dangerous, violent psychopaths who’ve committed the most heinous of crimes, such as him.