Australian Ch7 documentary claims new lead in search for missing Madeleine McCann.

[Eleanor]

Infamy.  Infamy.  They've got it infamy.

Castigated as a supporter over there.  Castigated as a sceptic over here.

Infamy.  Infamy.  They've got it infamy.

 *&*%£

It takes some doing getting it 100% wrong 100% of the time.  But take heart, you could have been banned from worse places.  I have.

[barrier]

Where does that quote come from?

Daily Star printed version.

[Robittybob1]

Pat Brown had a lovely time digging around in Ancient Portuguese Burial Sites, although I've never been certain of what she was looking for.
She doesn't seem to have found it, whatever it was.  But she might have picked up a curse or two.

The curse of the PJ controller, also known as Goncalosis

[Admin]

Any further disruption on this thread will invoke an instant ban.

[misty]

There is a huge amount of knowledge and information about the case on CMOMM, a lot of it gathered by PeterMac and Bennett. It's not all correct and I don't agree with all their conclusions but the forum is very useful as a resource. Googling the case usually brings up that forum because they have recorded most of the important information which exists and discussed most of the questions which have emerged.

Ignoring or demonising the forum because of it's stance or it's membership is, in my opinion, a clear indication of bias. Balance involves looking at opinions from both sides, not just one side like the UK media.

I agree with much of your post as there is some useful information on the CMOMM, despite the fact various posters there weave their own myths from it. Whilst I have never joined that forum, nor will I ever, I do occasionally read it.
Anyone who believes the abduction theory is not welcome there - I see even Blacksmith is banned.

[Mr Gray]

I agree with much of your post as there is some useful information on the CMOMM, despite the fact various posters there weave their own myths from it. Whilst I have never joined that forum, nor will I ever, I do occasionally read it.
Anyone who believes the abduction theory is not welcome there - I see even Blacksmith is banned.

The topic under discussion is whether Natasha Donne is balanced
As she has twice pointed readers to a blatantly sceptic site but never a supporters site then she obviously isnt

[stephen25000]

Thew bottom line as regards this topic is simple.

The program  was a fraud, from start to finish, and now the makers and host face legal action.

In my view, much deserved.

[Mr Gray]

Thew bottom line as regards this topic is simple.

The program  was a fraud, from start to finish, and now the makers and host face legal action.

In my view, much deserved.

For me the programme presented a very truthful viewpoint
Amaral and brown made fools of themselves
As for legal action
Let's see
I don't think she has a leg to stand on .....based on my experience

[jassi]

For me the programme presented a very truthful viewpoint
Amaral and brown made fools of themselves
As for legal action
Let's see
I don't think she has a leg to stand on .....based on my experience

You have a lot of experience with the Australian courts, do you?

[Mr Gray]

You have a lot of experience with the Australian courts, do you?

Experience with appearing on tv and the pitfalls involved

[stephen25000]

IMO, the key part of the program, from section 3 of the video posted on here on Sunday, was the video clip, we now know came from July the 24 th 2011.

The McCann's responses to the question just after 8 minutes and 22 seconds, speak volumes. IMO, of course.

The videos of Amaral and Brown were edited, clearly to their detriment, and it hasn't been acknowledged when Amaral's interview took place.

He has denied taking part in the program.

As to the interviewer. all she does is smirk.

Certainly not a professional approach, and her bias was obvious from the onset. It also, misinformed viewers, by mixing material from different years, and this was not pointed out.

[Mr Gray]

IMO, the key part of the program, from section 3 of the video posted on here on Sunday, was the video clip, we now know came from July the 24 th 2011.

The McCann's responses to the question just after 8 minutes and 22 seconds, speak volumes. IMO, of course.

The videos of Amaral and Brown were edited, clearly to their detriment, and it hasn't been acknowledged when Amaral's interview took place.

He has denied taking part in the program.

As to the interviewer. all she does is smirk.

Certainly not a professional approach, and her bias was obvious from the onset. It also, misinformed viewers, by mixing material from different years, and this was not pointed out.

It's all just opinion
Amarals video was extremely unfactual but I haven't seen any criticism of that

[G-Unit]

The topic under discussion is whether Natasha Donne is balanced
As she has twice pointed readers to a blatantly sceptic site but never a supporters site then she obviously isnt

Was Kandohla demonstrating her bias too, telling her readers where to see Amaral's documentary?

The heartbroken parents face fresh turmoil after a controversial TV documentary based on ex-cop Goncalo Amaral’s shocking book ‘The Truth of The Lie’ emerged on YouTube.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2878185/kate-gerry-mccann-sue-video-blaming-maddies-disappearance/

[Alfie]

I agree with much of your post as there is some useful information on the CMOMM, despite the fact various posters there weave their own myths from it. Whilst I have never joined that forum, nor will I ever, I do occasionally read it.
Anyone who believes the abduction theory is not welcome there - I see even Blacksmith is banned.

Only because he's been so rude about Tony Bennett and his flunkies. 

[ShiningInLuz]

The topic under discussion is whether Natasha Donne is balanced
As she has twice pointed readers to a blatantly sceptic site but never a supporters site then she obviously isnt

The topic is the Australian C7 documentary.

And it would help if you spelled Natasha Donn's name correctly.